997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Are PCCB's really worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
KBS911's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 91
From: Florida
Rep Power: 21
KBS911 is infamous around these parts
Are PCCB's really worth it?

Just got the new Car and Driver with a look at stopping performance.

Interesting evaluation where they stated that they actually "grew weary" trying to get the Porsche brakes to fade. Both PCCB and standard S brakes "survived more than 35 back to back stops without a decrease in performance". Stopping distance averages were 305" in 100 to 0 stops.

Impressive data. "PCCB buyers enjoy a 37 pound weight savings but not necessarily more robust brakes".

So the question is, are the PCCB's really worth the money?
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #2  
vizman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 136
From: Miami, Fl.
Rep Power: 24
vizman is infamous around these parts
I dont think so.
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #3  
mickfluff's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,516
From: ri
Rep Power: 97
mickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant futuremickfluff has a brilliant future
easy answer

No way, that said would I take them over stockers of course. If money is NO object that is a different question, but based on your question I would say based on the how 95% of P car owners drive their cars (too include the week end track guys) no way. But yes I will powder coat my stockers yellow...... more because I like the contrast then trying to be a poser but anyway... happy to hear the stock brakes (were they stock base model or the big reds in the comparison) held their own.... there is a video on youtube of a race of a none S, an S and a few other cars where the stock carerra had serious brake fade early and know many hang their hat on that video as gospel but its only one vid, could have been a ton of factors why the results were they way they were....



Originally Posted by KBS911
Just got the new Car and Driver with a look at stopping performance.

Interesting evaluation where they stated that they actually "grew weary" trying to get the Porsche brakes to fade. Both PCCB and standard S brakes "survived more than 35 back to back stops without a decrease in performance". Stopping distance averages were 305" in 100 to 0 stops.

Impressive data. "PCCB buyers enjoy a 37 pound weight savings but not necessarily more robust brakes".

So the question is, are the PCCB's really worth the money?
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
TripleInboard's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 199
From: Texas
Rep Power: 29
TripleInboard is infamous around these parts
I don't have them on my car but I think they are absolutely worth it. No brake dust, less unsprung weight, perform better under extreme conditions, look great, etc... That said, it is a tough option to get your money back on when you sell the car.
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #5  
cephas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 607
From: Twisty Roads
Rep Power: 43
cephas is infamous around these parts
some people compare HP/dollar.
you can compare braking distance / dollar....
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #6  
RandomName's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
From: Orange County
Rep Power: 41
RandomName is infamous around these parts
Keep in mind that its not like it is indestruable. When it comes time to replace the rotor (due to cracks or or damage or whatever) that's when owners find out how uber-expensive those things truly are.
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #7  
b911s's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 166
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Rep Power: 26
b911s is infamous around these parts
Well, 1500 miles so far with mine and no brake dust, isnt that worth it? I wouldnt buy another Porsche without them now. They are a little pricey but a car in this category should have them. I just like the lastest technology.
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #8  
mkk62's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 185
From: fort myers, fl
Rep Power: 26
mkk62 is infamous around these parts
i have had a 997S with and without pccb and there are many threads on the subject...i track only about 1-2 times a month and do not see any difference in performance...a couple of friends have followed me in their 997s's in steels and they have no fade.. (we are not racers, but do instruct DE's)...also just replaced my front pccb's 10 grand just for the rotors...... next time steel for me...
have heard of others not being careful and cracking their rotors with a wrench they are very fragile and after 10k i am very paranoid...

if money no options would get them, otherwise not..mine came with the car when i bought it cpo'ed

they are nice though..btw after a couple of track days i do get brake dust....

.02 cents
 
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #9  
yrralis1's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,108
From: South Florida
Rep Power: 529
yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !
Had them on one of my three 997 cars . I liked having no brake dust but upon resale they were negative .

If I had to select the biggest positive feature I found about the PCCB's it was how well they handled in the rain . Still not worth 8K.

As for braking distances . I feel the Brembo (aftermarket ) offers better performance at a cheaper price but one can't beat the price of the stock brakes and they are great.

On my Turbo I have 700Hp(EVT700) on stock brakes and I have considered upgrading to Brembo but thus far the stock steel brakes have held up impressively .

Even the cermaics were designed for a stock Turbo so I feel that upgrading in my case would tilt in the direction of aftermarket.
 

Last edited by yrralis1; Jun 27, 2008 at 03:21 AM.
Old Jun 26, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #10  
mdrums's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,800
From: Tampa
Rep Power: 234
mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !mdrums Is a GOD !
For durable performance stay with the the steel big red brakes.
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #11  
EdoctaT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 48
From: California
Rep Power: 19
EdoctaT is infamous around these parts
They do make substantially less brake dust... worth about 5k of the asking price right there alone! (Sarcasm!)
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #12  
NorthVan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,875
From: Vancouver
Rep Power: 684
NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !NorthVan Is a GOD !
I have the Red's on my car, no complaints about braking at all. The brake dust comes off with soap water, sponge and few minutes of your time. I have the Carrera Classics and can reach the back side (inside) of the wheel without taking them off.
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #13  
dndodd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 546
From: Birmingham, AL
Rep Power: 41
dndodd is infamous around these parts
I have them, like them, no regrets.
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #14  
Nugget's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 97
From: Austin Texas USA
Rep Power: 23
Nugget is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by yrralis1
As for braking distances . I feel the Brembo (aftermarket ) offers better performance at a cheaper price but one can't beat the price of the stock brakes and they are great.
Better brakes are not for reducing braking distances -- Just about any car can lock 'em up. Good brakes are about stopping next time, not this time. It's about heat dissipation. If you're comparing brake performance by evaluating stopping distances you're doing it wrong.
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #15  
yrralis1's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,108
From: South Florida
Rep Power: 529
yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !yrralis1 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Nugget
Better brakes are not for reducing braking distances -- Just about any car can lock 'em up. Good brakes are about stopping next time, not this time. It's about heat dissipation. If you're comparing brake performance by evaluating stopping distances you're doing it wrong.
I said nothing of braking distances .
The stock 997tt brakes (aka "big red") are a Brembo brake .
The upgraded version is merely an enhanced version made by the same company .


There are many threads on the Brembo upgrade on the Turbo forum but this photo and brief explanation covers the subject of weight and size of the upgrade compared to stock.(photos too) https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ghlight=Brembo
 

Last edited by yrralis1; Jun 27, 2008 at 11:08 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.