997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Cab @ Willow Springs ?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
crazycarlitos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,889
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 161
crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !
Question Cab @ Willow Springs ?

Signed up for an event at Willow Springs Intl Raceway.

https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...st-2012-a.html

should be a blast !

the sponsor (VetteFish) stated "All convertibles need a roll bar or another form of roll over protection. "

i m pretty sure WS allow convertibles with built-in roll protection (like the 997) but just wanted to make sure before i drive 2hrs to get there.

does anyone have experience at Willow Springs & 997 Cab ?

thx in adv
 
Old Dec 15, 2011 | 08:26 PM
  #2  
richard181's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 241
From: New York City
Rep Power: 25
richard181 is infamous around these parts
I would think they mean roll bar. not a suspension mode.
 
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
crazycarlitos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,889
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 161
crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !crazycarlitos Is a GOD !
FYI: the sponsor emailed me to let me know i am good to go on the track.

i love my cab even more now ! lol
 
Old Dec 16, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #4  
dweintra's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 24
From: Bellevue, WA
Rep Power: 0
dweintra is infamous around these parts
Has anyone taken a 997 targa to a track? Planning on going to Motorsport Ranch. I was there with my previous car, 996 coupe. Tons of fun. I know there is a compromise with the extra weight of the targa.
 
Old Dec 17, 2011 | 08:02 AM
  #5  
FlaHeel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 845
From: Viera, Florida
Rep Power: 53
FlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of lightFlaHeel is a glorious beacon of light
SO the stock pop-up "roll over hoops?" are good enough for the track?
 
Old Dec 17, 2011 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
simsgw's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 764
From: California
Rep Power: 67
simsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by FlaHeel
SO the stock pop-up "roll over hoops?" are good enough for the track?
It isn't the track management that decides these things. Over a ridiculously wide range, track managers really don't care. The sanctioning body is who makes the rules.

That private rental of Streets of Willow may be following the lead of more formal organizations like the Porsche Club of America or the Porsche Owners Club. My preference is PCA so I don't really know the POC rule book, although I have glanced at their rules and they're quite similar.

The underlying philosophy is that stock cars -- truly as-it-came-from-the-factory stock -- are safe with the manufacturer's own features. Modifications are presumed to be made to get more performance so additional safety equipment is required the more modified the car is. I've never read this in a PCA publication, but a secondary consideration for an old-timer is my observation over the years that cars and drivers are more likely to have problems the deeper they get into modifications, so the requirement of extra safety equipment is justified as a desirable sobering influence as well as that underlying sound assumption about more performance needs more protection.

In PCA, any of the open cars are acceptable on track with only the original roll-over protection so long as the total modification points are under ... 400, is the limit I'm pretty sure. Just don't ask me to explain exactly how many mods that takes.

Gary
 
Old Dec 17, 2011 | 06:54 PM
  #7  
buck986's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,759
From: NJ
Rep Power: 185
buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !buck986 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by simsgw
It isn't the track management that decides these things. Over a ridiculously wide range, track managers really don't care. The sanctioning body is who makes the rules.




In NJ the policies are set by the state and are enforced by the State police.

http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/info/pdf...egulations.pdf
 
Old Dec 17, 2011 | 07:09 PM
  #8  
Manifold's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,670
Rep Power: 195
Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !Manifold Is a GOD !
The other question to ask is whether you feel safe on the track in a cab. I've thought about tracking my cab, but decided to defer that for a while, sticking with a hardtop for now. Speeds well over 100 mph are no joke ...
 
Old Dec 17, 2011 | 10:37 PM
  #9  
simsgw's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 764
From: California
Rep Power: 67
simsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond reputesimsgw has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by buckwheat986
It isn't the track management that decides these things. Over a ridiculously wide range, track managers really don't care. The sanctioning body is who makes the rules.
Got to disagree with you here Gary...at least in NJ there is a higher power than the sanctioning body. In NJ the policies are set by the state and are enforced by the State police.

http://www.state.nj.us/njsp/info/pdf...egulations.pdf
Aha! So in New Jersey the state is the sanctioning body!

Seriously, that's an interesting tidbit I never heard before. Thanks, Buckwheat. I checked a couple of rules and they read very much like the PCA rules except that the state defers to the sanctioning body in several areas that PCA makes specific of course. A wise choice of legislative style since legislative rule-making is notoriously lethargic. Basically, they are more lax than our PCA rules but since they deal with situations like that unsanctioned 'private' event that started this thread, they do add some general social good.

Of course, the important point is that a significant chunk of that document relates to licensing requirements for the track operator. I didn't find a specific enabling clause, but by inference it is the 'licensee', the track operator, who is made responsible for ensuring the regulations on drivers and equipment and event operations are followed. That would be completely impractical at most California tracks so it suggests either 1) New Jersey courts accept some minimal good-faith effort on the part of the track operator and look to the organizers for the rest of the compliance effort; or 2) the social/financial culture of speed events is completely different in New Jersey.

Any idea which? For comparison purposes, at Willow Springs, we pay ten dollars a head, the same as entering to watch races, and we sign an omnibus release of the track owners from all responsibility that includes -- if memory serves -- a general release and acknowledgment that no ambulance or EMT service is available, bleachers cause splinter-butt, and jumping off telephone poles is an activity known to cause great bodily injury. Something like that.

By no means could ten dollars cover even the liability cost if the track operator were legally responsible for the way we conduct our event.

Gary
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nick49
996 Turbo / GT2
65
Jan 26, 2017 01:17 PM
ebb
Automobiles For Sale
4
May 16, 2016 01:54 PM
ModBargains
Boxster / Cayman
0
Sep 12, 2015 12:55 PM
AlecS
991
2
Sep 12, 2015 10:51 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 PM.