997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Clutch Time - Dual Mass or GT3rs/Single Flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #1  
Evoking's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 333
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 47
Evoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud of
Clutch Time - Dual Mass or GT3rs/Single Flywheel?

Guys,

My car has a Clutchmasters stage 3 twin disc clutch in it now. It is borderline undriveable - especially when hills come into play. Folks with Carrera GT consider it significantly more challenging to drive with the on/off nature. I'm going with Sachs 2.5 but need to pick a flywheel.

1) Dual mass flywheel. Probably the easiest of the options to drive and also quietest. Should also give better shock insulation for crankshaft pulley. Most expensive option by about $1k

2) GT3rs single mass flywheel. $1k cheaper. Less crankshaft pulley insulation. But I do have the prodrive pulley so its on there pretty good. It will be a little harder to drive but with Sachs single disc clutch I'm thinking it will feel orders of magnitude easier to drive than my existing twin disc anyhow.

What do you guys think - should I save the $ and get the GT3rs single mass flywheel? Pro's and con's?
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 01:15 PM
  #2  
Evoking's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 333
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 47
Evoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud of
No experience or opinions on this?
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 01:31 PM
  #3  
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,901
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
It really comes down to your use and tolerance. There are pro's and cons. I can tell you the Sachs drives like stock. Much better than the stage 3 in my opinion. With it you can do a LWFW and proper sprung disc for a nice compromise on all. And it will hold a solid 750hp. Many have 800 kits with it.

Give me a call and I will gladly go over details with you.
Sam
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 02:35 PM
  #4  
stilov's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,035
From: McKinney TX
Rep Power: 118
stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !stilov Is a GOD !
I've got a flywheel that's pretty good used. Somewhat local to you too. On me if you're interested.
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 03:23 PM
  #5  
brent95m3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 305
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 33
brent95m3 is a jewel in the roughbrent95m3 is a jewel in the roughbrent95m3 is a jewel in the roughbrent95m3 is a jewel in the rough
I have a 964RS lightweight flywheel on mine with a Sachs 2.5 clutch. Overall the difference in acceleration is worth it to me. 1st is nuts, 2nd is amazing. In the summer it sometimes rattles with the AC on and if I lug it in 5th or 6th on slow acceleration it sounds terrible (as a member on this forum has pointed out in previous threads).

I'd probably do it again as the engine response is amazing now, but there are some drawbacks as listed above.
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 04:20 PM
  #6  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
I'm a little confused as to why you say the GT3/single mass flywheel is $1,000 cheaper than the 996/997 turbo dual mass flywheel? You can get the dual mass flywheel for under $1,000 if you look around. List price on it is $1,200.

Sorry if I am mis-reading this but sounds like you may be getting gouged.
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 05:34 PM
  #7  
IMI A's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 503
From: UK
Rep Power: 138
IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !IMI A Is a GOD !
Pros are engine spins up much quicker and it makes the cars throttle response feel alive especially for modded cars with larger turbos and trick exhausts,

Cons are its little bit more noisy but for me it gives the car much more character and if driven properly the extra noise is easily managed out. I have a LWFW and absolutely love it.

I wouldn't have it for driving in rush hour traffic day to day other than for the odd journey though where its fine but there are better cars for that sort of thing. This cars for tracks and autobahn cross continent jaunts.
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 05:43 PM
  #8  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Sachs 764PP/ GT3RS 4.0 disc/ 964RS LWFW

Unbeatable combo for anything up to 700hp or so. The 4.0 disc is very quiet. Perfect modulation especially when combined with GT2 clutch hydraulics. I'd say it's easier to drive than the stock assist clutch. Zero noise with A/C off, just a tiny bit of occasional rattle with A/C on. 20lbs lighter that stock DMFW clutch. Have your ECU coded for a LWFW to prevent any stalling issues.
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; Dec 12, 2014 at 05:46 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 07:01 PM
  #9  
Evoking's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 333
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 47
Evoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud ofEvoking has much to be proud of
Thanks for all the feedback. I thought this job would be cheaper. Below is the breakdown of the job from my shop. This is with Sachs 2.5 and stock dual mass flywheel. I suppose the flywheel is in fact under $1000. But notice how much cheaper the bill is in the 2nd invoice which is from a car I found on eBay. Apparently that job used the single mass flywheel which is what got me wondering...

But now looking at them side by side it appears the real $ difference is the price of the clutch disc, pressure plate and throw out bearing. The other job has the whole kit for $1325. Whereas my quote they total $2200!





 

Last edited by Evoking; Dec 12, 2014 at 07:07 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 07:16 PM
  #10  
Macster's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,190
From: Benton County, AR
Rep Power: 147
Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !Macster Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Evoking
Guys,

My car has a Clutchmasters stage 3 twin disc clutch in it now. It is borderline undriveable - especially when hills come into play. Folks with Carrera GT consider it significantly more challenging to drive with the on/off nature. I'm going with Sachs 2.5 but need to pick a flywheel.

1) Dual mass flywheel. Probably the easiest of the options to drive and also quietest. Should also give better shock insulation for crankshaft pulley. Most expensive option by about $1k

2) GT3rs single mass flywheel. $1k cheaper. Less crankshaft pulley insulation. But I do have the prodrive pulley so its on there pretty good. It will be a little harder to drive but with Sachs single disc clutch I'm thinking it will feel orders of magnitude easier to drive than my existing twin disc anyhow.

What do you guys think - should I save the $ and get the GT3rs single mass flywheel? Pro's and con's?
While a LWFW is pretty light, the DMFW is also quite light considering.

The DMFW acts in part as a crankshaft dampener and helps isolate the crank from the more sudden and severe loads and shocks.

By buying a less expensive LWFW you are saving FW money while betting crankshaft money.

Frankly my gambling instincts would have me making the opposite bet. Spend a bit more for a DMFW and to increase the odds of avoiding a crankshaft failure down the road.
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 11:10 PM
  #11  
elite1's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,321
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 134
elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !elite1 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
Sachs 764PP/ GT3RS 4.0 disc/ 964RS LWFW

Unbeatable combo for anything up to 700hp or so. The 4.0 disc is very quiet. Perfect modulation especially when combined with GT2 clutch hydraulics. I'd say it's easier to drive than the stock assist clutch. Zero noise with A/C off, just a tiny bit of occasional rattle with A/C on. 20lbs lighter that stock DMFW clutch. Have your ECU coded for a LWFW to prevent any stalling issues.


Agree with this.


I installed the triple carbon ERP clutch on my car, I would think that the engagement of this setup (above) makes more sense.


Sometimes, I want to just redline my car and completely drop the clutch, this is what the clutch was designed for right? How about drivetrain limits? My point is over upgrading when unnecessary.


Go toward a stock setup with increased parts around that same philosophy. (increased pressure with pressure plates ect.)
 
Old Dec 12, 2014 | 11:42 PM
  #12  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
Unless a built engine is in your future you don't want more clutch than the "Sachs 2.5". Everything is a trade off, and the clutch/flywheel is a big deal when it comes to the overall enjoyment of the car.

If you blip the throttle to rev match downshifts a lot (5k rev match?) then maybe the lightweight flywheel would be worth something to you.

I'm running The Sachs 2.5 kit from AWE for like ~1700 and re-used my OEM flywheel. To be honest I couldn't even tell anything had changed. Only difference was the clutch held the power. I'm a big fan of doing the minimum necessary, you can go down a rabbit hole and spend a lot of money and get zero return very easily.
 
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 12:31 AM
  #13  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Macster
While a LWFW is pretty light, the DMFW is also quite light considering.

The DMFW acts in part as a crankshaft dampener and helps isolate the crank from the more sudden and severe loads and shocks.

By buying a less expensive LWFW you are saving FW money while betting crankshaft money.

Frankly my gambling instincts would have me making the opposite bet. Spend a bit more for a DMFW and to increase the odds of avoiding a crankshaft failure down the road.
Show me a crankshaft failure as a result of a LWFW.... A Mezger on every RS comes with a LWFW from the factory. If you use a factory RS sprung disc you have nothing to worry about. The springs on the disc dampen the shock loads.. I wouldn't call the DMFW light. It's almost 25lbs heavier than the 964RS FW and 28lbs heavier than a Cup FW.
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; Dec 13, 2014 at 12:46 AM.
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 12:42 AM
  #14  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Make sure you guys know what your getting. Don't go blindly buying a "2.5" kit, whatever that means. Make sure you know what is in the kit. There is no such thing as a 2.5 designation by Sachs. You want a Sachs Motorsport 764PP and a sprung disc if using a LWFW, or a solid disc for a dual mass. Don't get ripped off. The 764PP/4.0disc/964RSlwfw with all the bolts, ring gear, throw out bearing and guide tube is right at $2k. These are all OEM factory parts using the strongest available pressure plate Sachs makes. No, this is not a 2.x kit.
 
Old Dec 13, 2014 | 08:31 AM
  #15  
eurotom's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 915
From: SF Bay Area
Rep Power: 111
eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !eurotom Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
Make sure you guys know what your getting. Don't go blindly buying a "2.5" kit, whatever that means. Make sure you know what is in the kit. There is no such thing as a 2.5 designation by Sachs. You want a Sachs Motorsport 764PP and a sprung disc if using a LWFW, or a solid disc for a dual mass. Don't get ripped off. The 764PP/4.0disc/964RSlwfw with all the bolts, ring gear, throw out bearing and guide tube is right at $2k. These are all OEM factory parts using the strongest available pressure plate Sachs makes. No, this is not a 2.x kit.
A big Plus one !
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM.