Aston Martin DB7, DB9, DBS, Vantage V8, Vanquish, and Classic models

Aston's CC100

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 06:43 AM
  #1  
scottblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 489
From: Texas
Rep Power: 37
scottblack has a spectacular aura aboutscottblack has a spectacular aura aboutscottblack has a spectacular aura about
Aston's CC100

They unveiled it: http://cc100.astonmartin.com/
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 06:57 AM
  #2  
joe_vantage's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29
From: Scottsdale AZ
Rep Power: 19
joe_vantage is infamous around these parts
Very Cool! I love the front profile!!
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 06:57 AM
  #3  
scottblack's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 489
From: Texas
Rep Power: 37
scottblack has a spectacular aura aboutscottblack has a spectacular aura aboutscottblack has a spectacular aura about
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:26 AM
  #4  
Racer_X's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,266
From: whereabouts unknown
Rep Power: 120
Racer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud of
The front 3/4 view of the car is beautiful.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:30 AM
  #5  
Racer_X's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,266
From: whereabouts unknown
Rep Power: 120
Racer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by scottblack
At 400 kg less than the V12V I would think 0-60 would be better than 4 seconds as the article suggests.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 09:27 AM
  #6  
black penguin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 664
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 56
black penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant future
I agree. Over 4.0 to 62 is too slow for a carbon fibre bodied car with a 500+ hp V12 in it.

That is no faster than my V12 and its aluminum with a full roof etc. it's also slower than the similarly powered R8V10 I owned. Again that car had a full roof and weighed 3700 lbs+

Hmmmm. It's like they didn't Di the engineering exercise to match the beautiful design exercise.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
mikey k's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 867
From: The Heart of England
Rep Power: 54
mikey k is a name known to allmikey k is a name known to allmikey k is a name known to allmikey k is a name known to allmikey k is a name known to allmikey k is a name known to all
The stats are academic
They've made two and sold both
I guess they are looking for the halo effect to sell the standard cars
I would also guess there a some design cues for the new models come up
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 12:14 PM
  #8  
gekko's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 606
From: The Open Roads
Rep Power: 43
gekko is infamous around these partsgekko is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by mikey k
The stats are academic
They've made two and sold both
I guess they are looking for the halo effect to sell the standard cars
Bang on!

Not to mention, puts the last Lamborghini introductions to shame . . .
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 01:29 PM
  #9  
Racer_X's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,266
From: whereabouts unknown
Rep Power: 120
Racer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud ofRacer_X has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by mikey k
The stats are academic
Perhaps, but I'm still curious what she can actually do. Maybe mid 3s to 60? Also must handle really well without all the additional mass.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 04:19 PM
  #10  
XJRS Owner's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,159
From: Northern CT
Rep Power: 144
XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Racer_X
Perhaps, but I'm still curious what she can actually do. Maybe mid 3s to 60? Also must handle really well without all the additional mass.
Here you guys go again...

Performance, performance, performance. Give it a rest, will ya? This car is already an iconic Aston Martin, and the very well heeled people who are getting these two cars don't give two hoots about performance, as long as it is adequate...and it is.

Y'all need to go buy a GTR, or a Viper, or a Lambo, or an R8, or a 911 Turbo, or a whatever. You don't 'get' Astons and never will.

BTW, not picking on you directly, just using your quote...
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 06:11 PM
  #11  
4pipes's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 123
From: NorCal
Rep Power: 19
4pipes is infamous around these parts4pipes is infamous around these parts
Totally agree, I didn't buy an Aston for performance. I bought it because my wife said it is the best looking car on the road, and I agreed with her.

I have another car that weighs 2400 pounds with me in it and develops 624 ft-lbs of torque. It has performance that can't be used anywhere.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #12  
black penguin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 664
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 56
black penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant futureblack penguin has a brilliant future
Awesome to be told we don't get Aston Martin by a Jaguar guy

First off we do get Aston Martin. Just because you don't agree with us, does not mean we don't "get it", and no one is suggesting the performance bar is a GTR. That's just stupid and not the point. BTW, I ran my V12 Vantage and my R8 V10 at the same time and the V12 Vantage is the more visceral car. The R8 V10 at 200lbs less was quieter and faster. I can tell you from first hand experience that I know the difference between the two cars. I am not asking Aston to be an R8, a Lamborghini, a GTR etc.

Aston does not just make one kind of car, as a result it has different kinds of customers. They have a history of building some very fast cars. From LeMans racers in the past and In recent times V12 Vantage and the amazing Zagato. Plus at this very moment they are leading the Nurburgring 24 hours. So performance is a very real PART of the brand.

But more to the point THIS car is not a GT car for dentists to go golfing in. THIS car is an homage to an historically significant race car (the non-road car based, purpose built 1959 leMans winning DBR1 race car). Performance IS the POINT. It is a celebration of a car that was the fastest and the best of its generation, who's only purpose was to win. To reduce it to a styling exercise is missing the point.

But curiously it has a carbon fibre body and an additional 40hp but is no faster than a V12 Vantage or the Zagato??

It is sublime to look at and I'm sure its an amazing experience, but this is not a GT car, it lacks proper doors, roof, windshield etc. It is a homage to a race car, as such it should be much lighter, more raw and focused. It should be extreme in every way.
 

Last edited by black penguin; May 19, 2013 at 08:05 PM.
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:56 PM
  #13  
drcollie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,172
From: Alexandria, VA
Rep Power: 87
drcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond reputedrcollie has a reputation beyond repute
That needs a set of HRE P40's......
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
Aston.Ca's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 688
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 46
Aston.Ca is just really niceAston.Ca is just really niceAston.Ca is just really niceAston.Ca is just really niceAston.Ca is just really nice
Love the paint colour.
 
Old May 19, 2013 | 08:15 PM
  #15  
XJRS Owner's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,159
From: Northern CT
Rep Power: 144
XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !XJRS Owner Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by black penguin
But more to the point THIS car is not a GT car for dentists to go golfing in. THIS car is an homage to an historically significant race car (the non-road car based, purpose built 1959 leMans winning DBR1 race car). Performance IS the POINT. It is a celebration of a car that was the fastest and the best of its generation, who's only purpose was to win. To reduce it to a styling exercise is missing the point.
Performance is NOT the point of this car. It is only a styling exercise whose purpose is to celebrate 100 years by evoking the DBR1, not to even begin to emulate its race-winning performance.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 PM.