BMW //M Discussion on the BMW M1, BMW M3, BMW M4, BMW M5, and the BMW M6

2008 m3 coupe with dct - c63 comparison?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #91  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
I do have to mention one thing...the C63 does have better steering feel/feedback than the m3 (and every magazine confirms this as well). the m3s servo-tronic was one of a few things i didnt like about the car.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #92  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by PorscheC4
I do have to mention one thing...the C63 does have better steering feel/feedback than the m3 (and every magazine confirms this as well). the m3s servo-tronic was one of a few things i didnt like about the car.
Why didn't you adjust it? The base mode gives moderate feedback as it allows you to quickly make turns in tight spaces.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #93  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by niqui
i am not trying to support a lost cause or anything, but was just reading this, and thought i might as well put in the thread its from motortrend, so bias will obviously be an issue, but intresting nonetheless.
With the DCT, the 414-hp M3 closes the straight-line performance gap to the sturm-und-drang 451-hp Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG. It'll run wheel-to-wheel with the thundering Mercedes to 60 mph and is a tenth faster to 100 mph. Quicker acceleration off the line gets the gruntmeister Benz to the end of the quarter in a tenth of a second less, but the trap speeds are virtually identical.
http://motortrend.automotive.com/781...ive/index.html

No need to even waste your time, some people would rather think the C63 is faster because it has larger figures on paper.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:49 PM
  #94  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by CURI0
Why didn't you adjust it? The base mode gives moderate feedback as it allows you to quickly make turns in tight spaces.
I had the car in M mode-DSC completely off, EDC at sport setting, power button on. other than that, im not sure what else i could have done.
then again, it is being compared to what I drive in the Cayman S, which IMO has few equals in terms of steering feel.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:53 PM
  #95  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by CURI0
No need to even waste your time, some people would rather think the C63 is faster because it has larger figures on paper.
Well, we all know numbers on paper dont mean a thing, because the 997 GT3 has the same hp as the m3, and less than the c63 and can still crush them both in any performance figure out there despite not having the most hp or most tq. hell, a 996 GT3 with only 381 hp is still faster than them both (as its pretty much almost as fast as the 997 GT3). so numbers on paper dont mean much, its the real world results that speak volumes (given equal drivers that is).
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #96  
mchctsV's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 528
From: miami fl
Rep Power: 42
mchctsV is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by PorscheC4
I had the car in M mode-DSC completely off, EDC at sport setting, power button on. other than that, im not sure what else i could have done.
then again, it is being compared to what I drive in the Cayman S, which IMO has few equals in terms of steering feel.
just cause you have it in m mode doesnt mean you have the highest performance settings you have to input them
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #97  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by PorscheC4
Well, we all know numbers on paper dont mean a thing, because the 997 GT3 has the same hp as the m3, and less than the c63 and can still crush them both in any performance figure out there despite not having the most hp or most tq. hell, a 996 GT3 with only 381 hp is still faster than them both (as its pretty much almost as fast as the 997 GT3). so numbers on paper dont mean much, its the real world results that speak volumes (given equal drivers that is).
Agreed.

I will do the 996 GT3 MKII vs. M3 DCT run soon and get it on video. I think it will be extremely close either way. There is a video posted of a 996 GT3 running a DCT but the GT3 is a MKI.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #98  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by mchctsV
just cause you have it in m mode doesnt mean you have the highest performance settings you have to input them
Exactly, you have to set it in Idrive.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:23 PM
  #99  
F430Rod's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 120
From: Orange Country, CA
Rep Power: 23
F430Rod is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by PorscheC4
Well, we all know numbers on paper dont mean a thing, because the 997 GT3 has the same hp as the m3, and less than the c63 and can still crush them both in any performance figure out there despite not having the most hp or most tq. hell, a 996 GT3 with only 381 hp is still faster than them both (as its pretty much almost as fast as the 997 GT3). so numbers on paper dont mean much, its the real world results that speak volumes (given equal drivers that is).
Well...they do mean something if you factor in more variables that are on paper like "weight" which you appear to be ignoring.

When it comes down to it....hp/weight ratio is a pretty good indicator. Gearing factors in also.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #100  
CURI0's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,363
From: Malibu
Rep Power: 119
CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !CURI0 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by F430Rod
Well...they do mean something if you factor in more variables that are on paper like "weight" which you appear to be ignoring.

When it comes down to it....hp/weight ratio is a pretty good indicator. Gearing factors in also.
I think he was just giving a general overview that there is more to performance than just hp / torque ratings. We could go over the variables for hours, temperature, tires, gearing, aerodynamics, etc.
 
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #101  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by mchctsV
just cause you have it in m mode doesnt mean you have the highest performance settings you have to input them
HTML Code:
Exactly, you have to set it in Idrive.
I did...they were in fact all dialed in through the idrive. my client advisor and i went over it all and made sure they were all maxxed out before we went out for a nice thrashing. and there was no such thing as following the 5500 rpm break-in either. i was at 7000-8400 rpms most of the time we were out. and as i remember it, the M button restores of all of the setting you have saved via the idrive for your own personal set up at the touch of that button.
 

Last edited by PorscheC4; Oct 17, 2008 at 01:56 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #102  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by CURI0
I think he was just giving a general overview that there is more to performance than just hp / torque ratings. We could go over the variables for hours, temperature, tires, gearing, aerodynamics, etc.
Exactly! there is so much more to it than just XXX hp and XXX tq.
 

Last edited by PorscheC4; Oct 16, 2008 at 08:05 PM.
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 02:30 PM
  #103  
F430Rod's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 120
From: Orange Country, CA
Rep Power: 23
F430Rod is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by PorscheC4
Exactly! there is so much more to it than just XXX hp and XXX tq.
Yeah...there is weight and gearing which you excluded from what is most likely on "paper". I was just pointing this out to you. You factor in these and you start running out of variables.

Again..even on paper...the hp/weight ratio proves the GT3 is faster than the M3. This is because the GT3 is so much lighter despite having same rated hp.

Of course there are a few exceptions to the rule but there are not that many....especially if racing to a distance in excess of a 1/4 mile from a rolling start.
 
Old Oct 20, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #104  
niqui's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 211
From: canada
Rep Power: 26
niqui is infamous around these parts
have any of u seen an m3 coupe in white, do u find it feminin?
 
Old Oct 22, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #105  
onetwo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 79
From: NY, NY
Rep Power: 23
onetwo is infamous around these parts
Anyone who can call the E92 M3 "boring" hasn't driven one spiritedly. The new M3 is one of the most exciting cars in its price range, and definitely THE most exciting in its class (C63, ISF, etc). The handling and power delivery (gives more and more as you reach redline) are incredible. Everything about the performance of this car screams, "Sharp." The M3's reflexes are amazing and really heighten the experience.

I've driven a C63 a few times and wasn't overly impressed with it. Each time I came in with reasonably high expectations of its power; each time I came away disappointed. I was prepared for the lack of "sharpness" in its reflexes compared to the M3. However, for a car that gives up to the M3 so much in other areas of performance, I was expecting the engine to compensate more. It just doesn't feel that much faster than the M3. And, opposite of my expectations, the C63 turned out to be LESS FUN on the street -- moving through traffic and even full throttle redline blasts in many situations simply felt better in the M3.

My test drives went M3, C63, C63, M3, M3, C63 -- I think I'm pretty much 100% set on my opinions.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Texas1
Automobiles For Sale
6
Sep 20, 2015 09:12 AM
gadgetman
Automobiles For Sale
11
Sep 10, 2015 03:29 PM
jpetro1010
Aston Martin
5
Sep 7, 2015 01:20 PM
plenum
991
0
Sep 2, 2015 09:16 AM
pjb84
Automobiles For Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 12:57 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:20 PM.