BMW //M Discussion on the BMW M1, BMW M3, BMW M4, BMW M5, and the BMW M6

E60 M5 makes to 10 list!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #1  
og risker's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 761
From: South Pasadena, CA
Rep Power: 60
og risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud ofog risker has much to be proud of
E60 M5 makes to 10 list!

Of gas guzzlers!....."Of the vehicles on this list of the worst gas guzzlers on the road today -- compiled by the Environmental Protection Agency -- only two are SUVs, and only the Mercedes-Benz G55 can be considered full size. The rest of the guzzlers are super high-end exotics. Bentley contributes the most models here. Hidden among the Arnage Series and Continental Series are 12 model derivations that include sedans, coupes, convertibles and limited editions. We have arranged these and the two Maybach models into groups to make the list more inclusive.
The yardstick used in compiling the 10 worst guzzlers is the Environmental Protection Agency's estimated city and highway miles per gallon. You can check out all vehicles and their EPA ratings at www.fueleconomy.gov.
1. Lamborghini Murcielago LP640: The Gas Guzzler Tax (see note below) alone on this car is $6,400 and brings the total sticker to $362,400. Some would say that's a small price to pay for a car that will catapult you to 60 miles per hour from a stop in just over three seconds. It uses a 6.5-liter, V-12 engine to pump out 632 horsepower -- enough to propel the Murcielago to a top speed of 211 miles per hour.
Mileage: 8 mpg city/13 mpg highway
2. Bentley Arnage Series: Helping to inflate the base price of the entry-level Arnage to $232,085 is its $4,500 Gas Guzzler Tax. It uses a 6.75-liter, twin-turbo V-8 for its power, developing 500 horsepower. A six-speed automatic transmission feeds power to the rear wheels of this four-door car.
Mileage: 10 mpg city/14 mpg highway
3. Ferrari 612 Scaglietti: Capable of transporting four adults, the Ferrari 612 Scaglietti will set you back a measly $319,588. It is also a member of the $4,500 Gas-Guzzler-Tax club. Able to launch to 60 miles per hour in just over four seconds, it uses a 5.7-liter, V-12 to spit out 532 horsepower. The Scaglietti's top speed approaches 200 miles per hour.
Mileage: 9 mpg city/16 mpg highway
4. Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT8: Although not fuel friendly in any of its guises, the Grand Cherokee SRT8 makes this list thanks to the fuel needs of its 420-horsepower, 6.1-liter Hemi V-8 combined with the weight of its all-wheel-drive platform. Able to dash to 60 miles per hour in just five seconds, it can cover a lot of distance -- on road or off -- in a hurry. It's also the relative bargain on this list at $43,745.
Mileage: 11 mpg city/14 mpg highway
5. Mercedes-Benz G55 AMG: With all of the aerodynamics of a peach crate, the G55 still manages a zero to 60 mph run in just over five seconds. It takes its power from a 500-horsepower supercharged, 5.5-liter, V-8. Originally engineered as a military vehicle, it is fully off-road capable, yet is stuffed with amenities. Its base price is $120,325.
Mileage: 11 mpg city/15 mpg highway
6. Maybach 57/62: Essentially a stretched version of the Maybach 57, the Maybach 62 shares its mechanicals, including its 543-horsepower, 5.5-liter, V-12 engine. Reaching 60 miles per hour from a stop takes less than six seconds. The 62 version is 17 inches longer than the 57 version and all that extra space winds up as rear-seat legroom. Base price for the Maybach 57 is $365,250.
Mileage: 10 mpg city/16 mpg highway
7. Bentley Continental Series (GT/GTC/Flying Spur): Basically, the GT is the coupe; the GTC is the convertible; and the Flying Spur is the sedan -- all configurations of the Continental. There are also "S" versions of each of these. The least expensive is the GT at $185,495, including the Gas Guzzler Tax. Under the hood lurks Volkswagen's 6.0-liter, V-12 that produces 552 horsepower and zips from zero to 60 in less than five seconds.
Mileage: 10 mpg city/17 mpg highway
8. Aston Martin DB9: The DB9's $184,500 base price includes its 443-horsepower, 6.0-liter V-12 that will slingshot this two-door hardtop from zero to 60 in less than five seconds. There is also a convertible version. Either a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic transmission ushers power to the rear wheels.
Mileage: 10 mpg city/17 mpg highway
9. Aston Martin DBS: A DB9 on steroids, the DBS weighs less and possesses a more lethal punch than its tamer sibling. Also powered by a 6-liter, V-12, here it makes 510 horsepower and is capable of making the zero to 60 sprint in just over four seconds. The car of choice for James Bond wannabes, the DBS, at $266,350, also packs a bigger base-price wallop than the DB9.
Mileage: 10 mpg city/17 mpg highway
10. BMW M5: The M5 is legendary among automobile enthusiasts. Its 5-liter, V-10 engine delivers 500 horsepower to the rear wheels via an automated seven-speed transmission. It can reach 60 miles per hour from a stop in less than five seconds. The starting price is $89,325.
Mileage: 11 mpg city/17 mpg highway
Note: Congress established the Gas Guzzler Tax in 1978 to discourage production and purchase of fuel-inefficient vehicles. The tax is assessed on new passenger cars that do not meet required fuel economy levels. The IRS administers the program and collects the taxes from car manufacturers or importers. The amount of tax is posted on the window stickers of new cars -- the lower the fuel economy, the higher the tax." Forbes



 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 01:14 PM
  #2  
SFdreamer's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 534
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 43
SFdreamer is a glorious beacon of lightSFdreamer is a glorious beacon of lightSFdreamer is a glorious beacon of lightSFdreamer is a glorious beacon of lightSFdreamer is a glorious beacon of lightSFdreamer is a glorious beacon of light
I still love mine .
 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #3  
M5Master's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 66
From: LA
Rep Power: 29
M5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud ofM5Master has much to be proud of
it may be a gas guzzler but co2 emissions are very low in comparison to other manufacturers.
 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
ice350's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,625
From: fort lauderdale
Rep Power: 106
ice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond reputeice350 has a reputation beyond repute
I'm a little surprised.
 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 08:57 PM
  #5  
solekeeper's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 173
From: South Fla.
Rep Power: 23
solekeeper is infamous around these parts
I only think about gas until i'm actually at the pump.
 
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #6  
Enilder's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,443
From: Northeast
Rep Power: 185
Enilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond reputeEnilder has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by og risker
Note: Congress established the Gas Guzzler Tax in 1978 to discourage production and purchase of fuel-inefficient vehicles. The tax is assessed on new passenger cars that do not meet required fuel economy levels. The IRS administers the program and collects the taxes from car manufacturers or importers. The amount of tax is posted on the window stickers of new cars -- the lower the fuel economy, the higher the tax." Forbes

I seriously doubt that anyone will be "discouraged" to buy any of these vehicles, simply due to this Gas Guzzler Tax. Another good excuse for government to get money off of people.
 
Old Dec 18, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
teflon_jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,904
From: 8000' up in the Rockies
Rep Power: 148
teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !teflon_jones Is a GOD !
I made the list at #5.

I've averaged 13.4 mpg since I bought the truck in a mix of mountain roads/highways/city.
 
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 05:17 PM
  #8  
mycarisjunk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0
mycarisjunk is infamous around these parts
Like the dealer told me right before i signed, "If gas mileage is a concern, u don't need to buy this kind of car!".
 
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
FadeToBlack's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 264
From: CE
Rep Power: 31
FadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of lightFadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of lightFadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of lightFadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of lightFadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of lightFadeToBlack is a glorious beacon of light
It's always funny to read this comment from the M5/M6 owners. It's the first rule of owning the car. The second would be not to think of the money spent on gas...
 
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 09:35 PM
  #10  
DarrinB's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 626
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 47
DarrinB is a name known to allDarrinB is a name known to allDarrinB is a name known to allDarrinB is a name known to allDarrinB is a name known to allDarrinB is a name known to all
if you own an M5 and are scrapping up change from under the couch to fill up the tank I think its time to sell.
 
Old Mar 16, 2011 | 11:44 AM
  #11  
flyingcesar's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 459
From: Federal Way, WA
Rep Power: 45
flyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to beholdflyingcesar is a splendid one to behold
I bet its also one of the funnest cars to empty a gas tank in.
 
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 02:35 PM
  #12  
StevenJMenna's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 58
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 18
StevenJMenna is infamous around these parts
Funny Article.....guess I have 2 in the top ten....DBS and M5. Well worth the extra fule dump!
 
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 01:28 PM
  #13  
dlaw300z's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 125
From: ATX
Rep Power: 26
dlaw300z is infamous around these parts
My Jeep comes in at #4. Maybe I should upgrade to a M5... you know for the sake of the environment and energy independence.
 
Old Mar 28, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #14  
cohenfive's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,630
From: sf bay area
Rep Power: 96
cohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud ofcohenfive has much to be proud of
i'll take a different view here....i owned and loved an e39 m5 for a long time..just sold it four months ago in fact. when the e60 came out, one of the reasons i didn't consider buying one was the horrible fuel efficiency, plus the small fuel tank. i didn't want to be constantly worrying about where the next gas station was, and quite frankly it bothered me that efficiency was literally not a factor in how the car was engineered. it wasn't a matter of being able to afford the gas, it was the arrogance of engineering the car in so wasteful a way. if the car had been as 'efficient' as the e39 that would have been fine for me.

now with the f10 i presume we will at least be back to e39 efficiency levels, if not better, and with a much higher performing car to boot. that is good engineering for this day and age, imho.

and while there were several factors in addition to lousy efficiency, the e60 m5 has been a 'dog with fleas' in the marketplace for the past few years...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cnebrask
Automobiles For Sale
7
Oct 3, 2024 08:19 PM
nagooyen
996 Turbo / GT2
20
Aug 28, 2015 08:39 AM
The Oss
Automobiles For Sale
2
Aug 24, 2015 08:19 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.