KA - In Memory of my Mom (Vincee) and best friend Michael J. Maring
#3287
Not good at all. Although that 996tt part is bigger than the others (996 GT2, 997tt, 997 GT2), it's flow ranked dead last. People are adding larger TB's and splitters to this part only to overwhelm this weak link.
Last edited by cjv; 11-19-2009 at 07:47 PM.
#3288
i havent ever had one in hand to see but is there ample room to extrude hone it or gotta scrap it and go sheetmetal on it? I would start with one of the other plenums and work from there.
Last edited by cjv; 11-19-2009 at 08:50 PM.
#3289
We are looking at that now. My guess would be to get a 997 GT2 plenum and work from there. That is not including the WC plenum in the mix.
#3292
We gave that consideration. When we started, we wanted to reduce the pin size by 2 mm. We calculated at 2.5 bar the motor has the flow capability for 1700 to 1800 hp. Would the case take it? Not sure, however our guess is it would not. So we decided not to go there. The next question that arose was ...... what do we believe the motor can go to without case issues. Our believe is somewhere between 1400 and 1500 hp max.
Looking at this number we looked at the wrist pins and decided dropping one mm instead of two would be the safe way to go.
We believed at these numbers, given the weight we already removed from the fly wheel, crank, rods and pistons in addition to off setting the centerline of the pistons and moving the wrist pin up into the bottom ring ....... we needed the meat in the full width of the wrist pin.
Last edited by cjv; 11-21-2009 at 05:33 PM.
#3293
Simon,
I'm just trying to be polite.
With your connections with Neil, you probably know more about my build than I do.
I understand the last piece to our puzzle ....... the rods, may be shipped this week. We will probably lose another week clearing customs. We are really getting close.
I'm just trying to be polite.
With your connections with Neil, you probably know more about my build than I do.
I understand the last piece to our puzzle ....... the rods, may be shipped this week. We will probably lose another week clearing customs. We are really getting close.
#3294
If you look at the aluminum piece that is between the head and the rubber hose you will see the piece we will be designing and making. This is the injector manifold. We will be making a manifold that matches our head intake port and houses two injectors per port. The combined rating on the two injectors will be 1350 cc's. Only one injector will operate at the lower levels. Both will come on when required. Bottom line is great idle and lower rpm operation. The manifolds will be flange x flange to bolt from the head to the throttle body.
We will then cut down the legs on the WC Plenum at the part where the hose slides over and weld on a flange to fit to the other side of the throttle body. The hoses will be eliminated completely.
Where the single 90 mm throttle body use to be along with where the MAF use to be will now be direct piping.
We will then cut down the legs on the WC Plenum at the part where the hose slides over and weld on a flange to fit to the other side of the throttle body. The hoses will be eliminated completely.
Where the single 90 mm throttle body use to be along with where the MAF use to be will now be direct piping.
Last edited by cjv; 05-02-2010 at 09:49 AM.
#3297
Our setup makes use of our own injector manifold which is shorter in height than the stock injector manifolds. We have the added height for the throttle body but we gain space by the elimination of the rubber boot connection. All in all we have minimal more room than the World Cup Plenum and Porsche injector manifolds.
Last edited by cjv; 11-24-2009 at 06:12 PM.
#3298
Alex,
We gave that consideration. When we started, we wanted to reduce the pin size by 2 mm. We calculated at 2.5 bar the motor has the flow capability for 1700 to 1800 hp. Would the case take it? Not sure, however our guess is it would not. So we decided not to go there. The next question that arose was ...... what do we believe the motor can go to without case issues. Our believe is somewhere between 1400 and 1500 hp max.
Looking at this number we looked at the wrist pins and decided dropping one mm instead of two would be the safe way to go.
We believed at these numbers, given the weight we already removed from the fly wheel, crank, rods and pistons in addition to off setting the centerline of the pistons and moving the wrist pin up into the bottom ring ....... we needed the meat in the full width of the wrist pin.
We gave that consideration. When we started, we wanted to reduce the pin size by 2 mm. We calculated at 2.5 bar the motor has the flow capability for 1700 to 1800 hp. Would the case take it? Not sure, however our guess is it would not. So we decided not to go there. The next question that arose was ...... what do we believe the motor can go to without case issues. Our believe is somewhere between 1400 and 1500 hp max.
Looking at this number we looked at the wrist pins and decided dropping one mm instead of two would be the safe way to go.
We believed at these numbers, given the weight we already removed from the fly wheel, crank, rods and pistons in addition to off setting the centerline of the pistons and moving the wrist pin up into the bottom ring ....... we needed the meat in the full width of the wrist pin.
#3300
It goes by three letters and I don't remember the three letters. I believe the wrist pin coating is referred to "Carbon like Diamonds" or "Black Carbon."
My understanding is it eliminates any gauling and overheating which can lead to bent and broken wrist pins. There is added lubrication and cooling directed to the wrist pins through rifle drilled rods. This oil also is directed to a cavity under the piston dome and then out the bottom of the pistons for additional piston cooling a la 965C motor design.