Stock 991.2 Turbo S LC baseline 10.49@131.26 mph
Stock 991.2 Turbo S LC baseline 10.49@131.26 mph
Got her over a 1000 miles this week so went back for testing of LC . I made 3 runs, two with aero down 3rd with aero in track setting , unfortunately only the 0-60 run data was there for aero down due to an error (data stopped recording). Interestingly it looks like track aero has little effect in the 1/4 mile, after looking at the data I actually lifted before the 1/2 mile point thus the trap was higher than my end velocity oops. Car was full weight , half a tank of gas , stock zeros at 38/48 psi , DA was + 500 with temp at 68 and as always 0 slope and 93 octane. Despite warmer conditions the imbedded in the quarter 60-130 broke into the 7.5"s and the trap was up to 131mph ! This thing can flat out move.
Last edited by gmd2003; May 15, 2016 at 09:07 AM.
Nice thanks for sharing OP. The 991.2's seem as strong as some tuned 991.1's.
But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.
The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.
Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.
Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.
The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.
Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.
Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
Nice thanks for sharing OP. The 991.2's seem as strong as some tuned 991.1's.
But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.
The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.
Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.
Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.
The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.
Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.
Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
Last edited by gmd2003; May 16, 2016 at 06:09 PM.
The 2.4 0-60 run was in a separate spot near my test road it wasn't from the 10.49 run that's why it's different . The test road is absolutely flat for miles it's pretty awesome . The road is quite bumpy in spots and the v box was mounted on my glass roof but the g's have nothing to do with the GPS data . At any rate the g's on the 10.49 run are as expected which is where all the other data comes from . I have tested multiple multiple cars in this location and the data tracks . The 10.8 no LC run was in the opposite direction in the same spot .
G
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gtron
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
2
Mar 3, 2020 02:00 PM




