Stock 991.2 Turbo S LC baseline 10.49@131.26 mph

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 15, 2016 | 09:02 AM
  #1  
gmd2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 107
From: Charleston
Rep Power: 33
gmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant future
Stock 991.2 Turbo S LC baseline 10.49@131.26 mph

Got her over a 1000 miles this week so went back for testing of LC . I made 3 runs, two with aero down 3rd with aero in track setting , unfortunately only the 0-60 run data was there for aero down due to an error (data stopped recording). Interestingly it looks like track aero has little effect in the 1/4 mile, after looking at the data I actually lifted before the 1/2 mile point thus the trap was higher than my end velocity oops. Car was full weight , half a tank of gas , stock zeros at 38/48 psi , DA was + 500 with temp at 68 and as always 0 slope and 93 octane. Despite warmer conditions the imbedded in the quarter 60-130 broke into the 7.5"s and the trap was up to 131mph ! This thing can flat out move.
 
Attached Images        

Last edited by gmd2003; May 15, 2016 at 09:07 AM.
Old May 15, 2016 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,901
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
Awesome! Once again great comparative data to use buddy!
 
Old May 15, 2016 | 04:31 PM
  #3  
Stage7's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 673
From: NE
Rep Power: 81
Stage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond repute
Great data, thank you for sharing. Thats extremely impressive, especially for an unprepped track and pump gas. Look at the 0-60 time too. Veyron-esque or Chiron-esque today.

Any videos?
 
Old May 16, 2016 | 12:48 PM
  #4  
longboarder's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,439
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 272
longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !
Nice thanks for sharing OP. The 991.2's seem as strong as some tuned 991.1's.

But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.

The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.

Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.

Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
 
Old May 16, 2016 | 06:05 PM
  #5  
gmd2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 107
From: Charleston
Rep Power: 33
gmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by longboarder
Nice thanks for sharing OP. The 991.2's seem as strong as some tuned 991.1's.

But I'm having a hard time understanding the plausibility of some of the data.

The G's obtained on that 0-60 mph run for instance. I've never seen anything so choppy beyond the 30mph mark on a pdk Turbo. Getting beyond 1.5 G's at 50mph and over 2 G's at 60mph means the car is making well over 1,000 HP.

Next, check out the elevation. On every single run, the starting and ending elevation is 104.987, except for the 0-60 run where the starting and ending elevation is 105.315. I've never seen this looking at thousands of vBox results. Particularly on your full have mile run, which did not get a variance of even one inch.

Maybe Pencilgeek and check out your files to see what's causing this.
The 2.4 0-60 run was in a separate spot near my test road it wasn't from the 10.49 run that's why it's different . The test road is absolutely flat for miles it's pretty awesome . The road is quite bumpy in spots and the v box was mounted on my glass roof but the g's have nothing to do with the GPS data . At any rate the g's on the 10.49 run are as expected which is where all the other data comes from . I have tested multiple multiple cars in this location and the data tracks . The 10.8 no LC run was in the opposite direction in the same spot .
 

Last edited by gmd2003; May 16, 2016 at 06:09 PM.
Old May 16, 2016 | 06:22 PM
  #6  
gmd2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 107
From: Charleston
Rep Power: 33
gmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant futuregmd2003 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by gmd2003
The 2.4 0-60 run was in a separate spot near my test road it wasn't from the 10.49 run that's why it's different . The test road is absolutely flat for miles it's pretty awesome . The road is quite bumpy in spots and the v box was mounted on my glass roof but the g's have nothing to do with the GPS data . At any rate the g's on the 10.49 run are as expected which is where all the other data comes from . I have tested multiple multiple cars in this location and the data tracks . The 10.8 no LC run was in the opposite direction in the same spot .
Here is the 0-60 from the 10.49 run, sorry for the confusion.
G
 
Attached Images  
Old May 26, 2016 | 07:35 AM
  #7  
Stage7's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 673
From: NE
Rep Power: 81
Stage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond repute
Any plans to take it to a prepped drag strip?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gtron
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
2
Mar 3, 2020 02:00 PM
sdg1871
991 Turbo
20
Apr 24, 2016 09:21 AM
tromero
991
17
Apr 4, 2016 06:16 AM
The Pork Hunt
996 Turbo / GT2
22
Apr 2, 2016 05:10 PM
twturbo
997 Turbo / GT2
0
Mar 21, 2016 11:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 PM.