991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

embarrassed by the 991 3.4

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 01:14 PM
  #31  
CarreraPete's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 505
From: Airmont Village, NY
Rep Power: 47
CarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud ofCarreraPete has much to be proud of
Kids love the Mustangs. Get a "Five-oh" and she'll allow you to drop her off at school anytime.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #32  
CarreraS997Blk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 94
From: NH
Rep Power: 0
CarreraS997Blk is infamous around these parts
buy 997 Turbo and experience speed and excelleration that will never stop promise
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 01:58 PM
  #33  
Min911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 16
Min911 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by CarreraPete:3786955
Kids love the Mustangs. Get a "Five-oh" and she'll allow you to drop her off at school anytime.
And impress them with a rear tire burnout at the light anytime, just don't try to explain to them it happens because of the bad tires and poor F/R weight distribution.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 02:35 PM
  #34  
AG991's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,479
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 102
AG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by tromero
I am torn because I love the aesthetic appearance of the car and the interior. If you could drop a 997 GTS engine/tranny/steering in my rolling 991 chassis I would be in pure bliss. I have had two 997's so not sure I want to go that route unless it's a 2010 turbo or GT3 which will solve my power woes. It's just frustrating that Porsche CAN do more but they choose not to. For example the "power kit" costs about $1000 extra in parts. Why not make it standard on all S cars? Because they can sell it for an extra $20k later that's why. Porsche purposely under engineers the cars so they can sell us what the car should have been to begin with. The 997 GTS was what the S should have been all along. They held out until the very end.
Very true about the power kit. But what is more, it adds little in low end torque. I have a 991S and a 7 year old Mustang GT (4.6 liter with some mods - most notably a 4:10 gear). I thought that it was just the fact that my Mustang is sooo torquie - it was set up that way, but unless you push it and are at least in sports mode, the lack of low end torque is noticable to me too.

I set up my Mustang to beat anyone to 35 mph - most of the time that is as fast as I get to go. And I now find the fact that the Porsche, or any car, can go faster than 150 mph to be virtually meaningless as you can never go that fast. The most that we normally get to go is maybe 80 mph, so getting there quickly is a bigger deal.

Don't get me wrong, I love the 991. I had a 997.s and I prefer the 991 (but that is me, reasonable minds can differ). If the power package offered the low end torque, I would be saving my lunch money. I will go drive the turbo when it comes out and I am sure of two things: I will love it and the wife will not just say no, she will say HE-double hockey sticks NO. I appreciate you comments and I don't think it is you or, with respect to other, that the car is so stable and good. It just means you are a torque junky with a beautiful car that does not float your boat. I agree with Buckwheat - for you, something else may be better. I liked the idea someone had about an older turbo - you get the torque and the asthetic. Best of luck whatever you do.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 03:09 PM
  #35  
aa909's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 523
From: AR
Rep Power: 70
aa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond repute
"If the power package offered the low end torque, I would be saving my lunch money."



For a NA engine, as the old saying goes there is no replacement for displacement. a 3.4 liter engine will never have anywhere near the low end torque that a larger V8 can deliver. That is just a plain fact. The porsche HP numbers for these smaller 3.4 liter engines are made up on the top end of the RPM range. IMO you can blame the MPG and emission requirements that are forcing porsche to go with these smaller more efficient engines but unfortunately we lose that low end power that we all love, especially when we accelerate in first and second gear at low rpms

We're all impressed by HP numbers, but we drive torque. And real low end accessible torque is IMO what brings the thrill to driving a super car on the street

Pretty much the only way to make up for this lack luster feel is by turbo charging the 3.4L engine. We'll see how the factory 991 turbo feels out of the gate, hopefully it will deliver the thrill we expect. My experience with the 997 Turbo is that it has lots and lots of torque (500+ ft-lbs), but I found the low end to be too timid below 3000 rpm. Fortunately a tune is all that is required to wake up the low end power and make it accessible from the low 2000 rpm range all the way to redline. A tuned 997 turbo with a free flowing exhaust is truly insane

The 991 is a great car, but for those who want raw power with accessible low end torque, then a 997 turbo (tuned + exhaust preferred) is an excellent alternative
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 03:23 PM
  #36  
Snowczar's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 973
From: North Vancouver, BC
Rep Power: 63
Snowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to beholdSnowczar is a splendid one to behold
I have a 991S Cab X51 incoming in 10 days or so. I also have a 996 TT Cab that has had mods done. There is no doubt in my mind the TT will be faster, have better low end pull and higher top speed. It won't ride as nice nor will it handle as well. Yes the mods on the TT include PSS 10's and more.

John in Vancouver
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 03:29 PM
  #37  
tx11's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 152
From: Austin TX
Rep Power: 24
tx11 is a glorious beacon of lighttx11 is a glorious beacon of lighttx11 is a glorious beacon of lighttx11 is a glorious beacon of lighttx11 is a glorious beacon of light
Smaller, lighter, high HP non FI cars are not low rpm torque monsters. For example a 458 makes 398 at 6K, Gallardo 398 at 6.5k and a 911S 326 at 5.6k.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 03:39 PM
  #38  
AG991's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,479
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 102
AG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond reputeAG991 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by aa909
"If the power package offered the low end torque, I would be saving my lunch money."



For a NA engine, as the old saying goes there is no replacement for displacement. a 3.4 liter engine will never have anywhere near the low end torque that a larger V8 can deliver. That is just a plain fact. The porsche HP numbers for these smaller 3.4 liter engines are made up on the top end of the RPM range. IMO you can blame the MPG and emission requirements that are forcing porsche to go with these smaller more efficient engines but unfortunately we lose that low end power that we all love, especially when we accelerate in first and second gear at low rpms

We're all impressed by HP numbers, but we drive torque. And real low end accessible torque is IMO what brings the thrill to driving a super car on the street

Pretty much the only way to make up for this lack luster feel is by turbo charging the 3.4L engine. We'll see how the factory 991 turbo feels out of the gate, hopefully it will deliver the thrill we expect. My experience with the 997 Turbo is that it has lots and lots of torque (500+ ft-lbs), but I found the low end to be too timid below 3000 rpm. Fortunately a tune is all that is required to wake up the low end power and make it accessible from the low 2000 rpm range all the way to redline. A tuned 997 turbo with a free flowing exhaust is truly insane

The 991 is a great car, but for those who want raw power with accessible low end torque, then a 997 turbo (tuned + exhaust preferred) is an excellent alternative
I agree, but mine is a 991S and I feel the same way with a 3.8l. It is not a 4.6 v8 or the new 5.0 v8 offered in the new Mustang. And, I can't emphasis this enough, the 4:10 geat and what it did for low end torque. It ruins you at the top end, but, how often do I get overy 100?

Again, I love both cars and I love my 991S. And when you stand on the 991S, or you put it into Sport Plus, it goes like you know what. But in normal mode - a pinto would beat it.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 03:57 PM
  #39  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by tromero
I have had my 3.4 manual for nearly a year now and from the first day have been only luke warm to it and in many ways consider it a step backward from the 997. My 12 year old niece was visiting the other day and asked me to take her for a ride. During the ride she commented that the car "makes a lot of noise but doesn't feel very fast". She was right. With the phoney sounds being piped into the cabin you feel like you are in a race car when in fact you are moving forward at a sluggish pace. How I wish I had gotten a 997 GTS instead. It was a humbling experience.
Ain't that some $h@t. Here's a song that fits the situation:

You know this guy? anyways, sell that mother.... Buy a BMW perhaps? lol My under 4 second S feels slow, too. Anyone selling a G6 jet? Call me.
 

Last edited by VikingMariner; Mar 6, 2013 at 04:02 PM.
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 05:10 PM
  #40  
chuckbdc's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 781
From: Maryland USA
Rep Power: 59
chuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by AG991
I agree, but mine is a 991S and I feel the same way with a 3.8l. It is not a 4.6 v8 or the new 5.0 v8 offered in the new Mustang. And, I can't emphasis this enough, the 4:10 geat and what it did for low end torque. It ruins you at the top end, but, how often do I get overy 100?

Again, I love both cars and I love my 991S. And when you stand on the 991S, or you put it into Sport Plus, it goes like you know what. But in normal mode - a pinto would beat it.
Yup, if you drive slow it doesn't go fast.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #41  
barihunk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 80
From: USA
Rep Power: 18
barihunk is infamous around these partsbarihunk is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by tromero
I have had my 3.4 manual for nearly a year now and from the first day have been only luke warm to it and in many ways consider it a step backward from the 997. My 12 year old niece was visiting the other day and asked me to take her for a ride. During the ride she commented that the car "makes a lot of noise but doesn't feel very fast". She was right. With the phoney sounds being piped into the cabin you feel like you are in a race car when in fact you are moving forward at a sluggish pace. How I wish I had gotten a 997 GTS instead. It was a humbling experience.

And here I thought the whole point of the matter was to let my passenger feel the car is going super slow (while going xyz mph) so there wouldn't be any "drive slower!!!!" complaints.

But back to the OP... This lack of torque has been on my mind too, and do wonder what would've happened if they had kept the 3.6 on the 991 - The official EPA gas mileage isn't that different on the base 991 and 997 so the fuel economy point may be moot.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 05:44 PM
  #42  
certified_prime's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 274
From: NY
Rep Power: 29
certified_prime is a glorious beacon of lightcertified_prime is a glorious beacon of lightcertified_prime is a glorious beacon of lightcertified_prime is a glorious beacon of lightcertified_prime is a glorious beacon of lightcertified_prime is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by Min911
I bet the 3.4L N/A engine does not feel fast off the line even compared to the turbo 2.0L 4s you find in many entry level sport sedans like BMW, Audi and Caddy. But I decided to pay twice the money to get the base 911 this time, precisely because I don't like those 2.0T engines. I am used to my BMW N/A I6, that is how far I am willing to go to keep my engine N/A and high revving.

I understand more and more people now prefer low end torque, if so, it is a waste of money buying a base Porsche. Get one of these 2.0Ts and you will feel faster. Having said that, I am also concerned about the base 911 not feeling fast enough, which is why I ordered sport chrono, PTV Plus, PASM and paddle shifters
Are you me?? Exactly what I feel. I came from a 2000 BMW e46 (323Ci). I like my engines with 6 Cylinders, lined up flat or inline, and naturally aspirated. There is a special place in heaven for a nice natural power band.
 
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 06:08 PM
  #43  
Kenshin's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 91
From: Brownsville, Texas
Rep Power: 22
Kenshin is a name known to allKenshin is a name known to allKenshin is a name known to allKenshin is a name known to allKenshin is a name known to allKenshin is a name known to all
I drive a Toyata Corolla 2004 until my C4S shows up in may-June......you wanna switch till then?

Promise ill give it back
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 09:36 AM
  #44  
Min911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 16
Min911 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by certified_prime:3787217

Are you me?? Exactly what I feel. I came from a 2000 BMW e46 (323Ci). I like my engines with 6 Cylinders, lined up flat or inline, and naturally aspirated. There is a special place in heaven for a nice natural power band.
Indeed, I am new to flat 6, but a good N/A I6 is one sweet smooth rev happy engine deserves its own place. The notion that a 2.0T gets better mpg is not even proven. In the last batch of 528s they used the 3.0 I6s with 8spd, got 32mpg highway. That was for one heavy car. The new 528 with the 2.0T has pretty much the same mpg, when all the other eco measures such as auto stop and start added.

Speaking of CAFE standard, one may argue it has a significant impact on more "luxury exclusive" manufactures like BMW and Benz. They don't make mainstream high mpg cars in volume, need cars like the 3 series and C class to meet the mpg.

Porsche does not have this issue, as part of VW Group, they move more than enough high mpg Jettas to meet CAFE. I think part of the appeal of Porsche is the smaller flat 6s to keep the weight and center of gravity down, and make faster time than those V8s, V10s or even V12s.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 09:45 AM
  #45  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
So in other words, the 991 base is optimized for hardcore driving on twisty roads, not drag racing down Main Street. Solid. Right on. Dig it. Worth every penny in the hands of a capable driver.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.