991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

embarrassed by the 991 3.4

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:18 PM
  #61  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Kcarrigan
A very interesting read. I too have complained at length about the 991's lack of grunt, and the more I drive it, the less I think there is any defending it....
No offense and no intention of bragging about my own driver education and experience in many countries, but I'm convinced we don't have the same car. I'm too lazy to type more; wish Gary was still around. Best of luck with your gearing issues. You should get rid of the machine.
 

Last edited by VikingMariner; Mar 7, 2013 at 03:21 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:21 PM
  #62  
MayorAdamWest's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 141
Rep Power: 29
MayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud ofMayorAdamWest has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by VikingMariner
No offense and no intention of bragging about my own driver education and experience in many countries, but I'm convinced we don't have the same car. I'm too lazy to type more. Wish Gary was still around. Best of luck with your gearing issues. You should get rid of the machine.
I'm certainly not complaining about torque, which is more than adequate above 4k rpm. The point I completely agree with Kcarrigan about is that on the track, 1st and 2nd are too far apart. I'm guessing the GT3 fixes that, according to the interviews.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:22 PM
  #63  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Ah I see. I haven't taken her to the track so I may not know. Thanks!
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:32 PM
  #64  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by VikingMariner
No offense and no intention of bragging about my own driver education and experience in many countries, but I'm convinced we don't have the same car. I'm too lazy to type more; wish Gary was still around. Best of luck with your gearing issues. You should get rid of the machine.
You seem bothered by what other people feel is 'enough' torque. Those who believe the same as the OP either purchase the S trim, or Turbo model.

Because these models sell, I tend to believe that MANY others agree with the OP.

There are some that feel the stock level of torque from the Turbo is not sufficient, but there are plenty of tuners and therapy sessions available for them.

(Maybe I'm misreading your 'tone')
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:40 PM
  #65  
aa909's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 523
From: AR
Rep Power: 70
aa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond reputeaa909 has a reputation beyond repute
This thread is very interesting, especially reading the various experiences from folks who own the same car

I've owned big V8s, smaller high revving 6s and most recently a 997TT

In my experience a big V8 with a broad torque curve is a blast to drive on the street. Endless power from 1500 rpm to redline. However when I had my high revving E46 M3 I had to keep the RPMs above 4000 to really feel the power but I enjoyed it just the same.

I think most folks who are unhappy with the 3.4 991 are probably short shifting, meaning shifting from 1st to 2nd much too early. You have to keep the RPMs up if you want to pull hard in 2nd and 3rd. preferably only shift into 2nd and 3rd when you can keep your revs above 4k. Otherwise you'll shift into 2nd at ~2500 rpm, mash the pedal and go nowhere. You can get away with this if you have a large V8 under the good but a 3.4L 6 will not be happy
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:50 PM
  #66  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
You seem bothered by what other people feel is 'enough' torque. Those who believe the same as the OP either purchase the S trim, or Turbo model.

Because these models sell, I tend to believe that MANY others agree with the OP.

There are some that feel the stock level of torque from the Turbo is not sufficient, but there are plenty of tuners and therapy sessions available for them.

(Maybe I'm misreading your 'tone')
You misread it. Relax. You're among friends. I don't agree with your statement. That's all. I don't see your argument as valid. It has nothing to do with what I think of you or my being bothered, which if I was I would not respond.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:53 PM
  #67  
Min911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 16
Min911 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by jaspergtr:3787927
Originally Posted by VikingMariner
No offense and no intention of bragging about my own driver education and experience in many countries, but I'm convinced we don't have the same car. I'm too lazy to type more; wish Gary was still around. Best of luck with your gearing issues. You should get rid of the machine.
You seem bothered by what other people feel is 'enough' torque. Those who believe the same as the OP either purchase the S trim, or Turbo model.

Because these models sell, I tend to believe that MANY others agree with the OP.

There are some that feel the stock level of torque from the Turbo is not sufficient, but there are plenty of tuners and therapy sessions available for them.

(Maybe I'm misreading your 'tone')
We need to separate street experience from track experience. The OP was not complaining about his track experience, only street driving, but in the last several posts members were discussing strictly track experience, more specifically out of corners on the track.

I also asked if they were driving manuals, or PDKs? No one cared to answer. I noticed the several 991 models, whether base, S that broke track records on Nurburgring, all had PDKs. Which is why I am curious to know what people's on the track experience with PDK.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 03:54 PM
  #68  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Perhaps I don't see it because I have the S with PDK & Sport Plus.
 

Last edited by VikingMariner; Mar 7, 2013 at 04:01 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 04:13 PM
  #69  
flyanddive's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 29
flyanddive is infamous around these partsflyanddive is infamous around these parts
I think it's because they are trying to squeeze more gas mileage out of the car. It looks like in the future the low end torque will be provided by an electric motor.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 04:13 PM
  #70  
Min911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 55
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 16
Min911 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by VikingMariner:3787945
Perhaps I don't see it because I have the S.
The latest discussion is about track experience. Several members who have in depth track experience complained about too tall first and second gears to exist corners at limits. The reason I asked them to specify if they were driving manual or PDK is from below:

Time is precious and every hundredth of a second counts. The optional Sport Chrono Package makes your driving experience priceless thanks to an even sportier tuning of throttle response and handling characteristics.

The package comprises dynamic gearbox mounts, a performance display, a digital and analogue stopwatch and the SPORT PLUS button. When this is pressed, optional Porsche Active Suspension Management (PASM) switches to ‘Sport’ mode for harder damping and more direct steering and therefore, even more intensive road holding.

The trigger threshold for PSM is raised. Agility is perceptibly enhanced when braking for corners with PSM, allowing even sportier braking and exit acceleration. For even greater dexterity, PSM can be set to standby while the car is still in SPORT PLUS mode. For safety, it is set to intervene automatically only when ABS assistance is required.

In conjunction with optional PDK, the Sport Chrono Package comes with two additional functions for a sporty drive that borders on a motorsport experience. The first is ‘Launch Control’, which is designed to produce a racing start.

The second function is the involving ‘motorsport-derived gearshift strategy’. Using this, Porsche Doppelkupplung (PDK) is geared up for the shortest possible shift times and optimum shift points, while torque boosts during gear changes provide the maximum acceleration available. This involving experience is further enhanced by overrun downshifts and the throttle-blip function for uncompromising driving pleasure.
Some of the features seem to give advantage to PDK/Sport Chrono over a manual, regardless if a base 3.4 or a 3.8 S.
 

Last edited by Min911; Mar 7, 2013 at 04:16 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 04:18 PM
  #71  
chuckbdc's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 781
From: Maryland USA
Rep Power: 59
chuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud ofchuckbdc has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Min911
We need to separate street experience from track experience. The OP was not complaining about his track experience, only street driving, but in the last several posts members were discussing strictly track experience, more specifically out of corners on the track.

I also asked if they were driving manuals, or PDKs? No one cared to answer. I noticed the several 991 models, whether base, S that broke track records on Nurburgring, all had PDKs. Which is why I am curious to know what people's on the track experience with PDK.
If one keeps the revs in the fat part of the torque curve it makes no difference in terms of manual or PDK, street or track. There is nothing slow or weak about the 3.2 relative to last years S when driven well.

No it does not have the torque of a 3.8 in the midrange, any more than the 3.8 S in comparison to a turbo charged 3 L BMW or a 5 L Vette. It was in fact not designed to, and not advertised to. It is not the car that should be an source of embarrassment.
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 04:37 PM
  #72  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by chuckbdc
If one keeps the revs in the fat part of the torque curve it makes no difference in terms of manual or PDK, street or track. There is nothing slow or weak about the 3.2 relative to last years S when driven well.

No it does not have the torque of a 3.8 in the midrange, any more than the 3.8 S in comparison to a turbo charged 3 L BMW or a 5 L Vette. It was in fact not designed to, and not advertised to. It is not the car that should be an source of embarrassment.
That's exactly right. Speaking as someone that has a couple of decades of track time at company expense and three years on the Autobahn, I was a bit baffled by the differential treatment of street and track on the issue. Again, wish Gary was here, but there's no way in hell I'm typing one of his long articles until an amateur really pisses me off. Hell I (we) can find the same number of deer in southern Maryland to steer around on a few well placed roads as at Summit Point and hit all the points on the throttle and brakes early in the morning.
 

Last edited by VikingMariner; Mar 7, 2013 at 04:42 PM.
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 05:12 PM
  #73  
rnl's Avatar
rnl
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,724
From: Pennsylvania
Rep Power: 132
rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !
I embarrassed myself today all the way to work, on a fee errands, picked up my wife and few other places. Humiliation, shame and regret. It was terrible. I almost returned home to get my van. Naaaah
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 05:20 PM
  #74  
VikingMariner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 317
From: USA
Rep Power: 28
VikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the roughVikingMariner is a jewel in the rough
Probably because your car is too damn big to fit in the driveway. lol Here we go again, eh?
 
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 05:23 PM
  #75  
rnl's Avatar
rnl
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,724
From: Pennsylvania
Rep Power: 132
rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !rnl Is a GOD !
That was few errands. Yes. It's a big butt car
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.