That's my wife's Coach bag, what's it doing there?

Oh and to the cowardly nutless wonder that gave me negative rep for posting comedy on this retarded thread. When I find out who you are, you will be neg gang repped in every hole you got.

 

Which of these speculations are you talking about?

-NOT a Showroom GT-R
-V-Spec Wheels and Tires Used
-11 Miles faster on straight than a real production GT-R (first test)
-As fast on back straight as cars that rape it in similar conditions elsewhere
-Porsche representatives cannot see extra hp


You can't see a fact if it slapped you in the head. Yet you contend that only Suzuki can pilot it at the limit or near to it offering that as an explanation why everyone else is 20 seconds slower.


Get outta here.

 

Which one is he?

 

they've already tested a production gt-r, why would they run the same test?
there goal was the zr-1 time with minimal upgrades (spec v wheels).
i'm not sure about the 11mph what was the exit speed of the previous corner? and at what point was the throttle 100%?
evidence of said raping in other conditions?
yeah, i'm sure those porsche reps are stupid, and didn't know why they were there. and i'm sure nissan didn't so much as report a boost reading. the gauge is plain to see for everyone.

heavychevy - you weren't there. you have no idea. but you inject your position as if it's fact... why do you care about this exactly?

you won't be happy until you, personally ride in the car that somebody else just bought from a dealer, and get driven around by suzuki-san himself. so until you schedule that event, everything you say is speculative at best.

 

Me too...

 

fair enough... even doubting thomas had to see the wounds himself. it's only human nature to not believe what they cannot see.

but to immediately cry foul when things don't go your way isn't necessary.

 

Um obviously it wasn't a production GT-R which is why Chris Harris' GT-R was so much slower, despite the conditions he was 25 seconds slower, and only 17 slower in the RWD GT2 while short shifting and admittedly not pushing it. But you knew that already. Anyone who drives on a course will say that an AWD is easier to drive if the course is a little slick than a RWD one. So if the GT-R is legitmately faster in the dry, it would be even faster if there is some moisture. The GT-R went from +3 to -7. Oh but I forgot, Suzuki is magical and can drive a car 15 seconds faster than everyone else.

Now, on to the more obvious points. This is a MY 10' GT-R which has updated suspension, tires and hp, why WOULDN'T they test a production version????? The MY 10' improvements are supposed to add performance are they not? What manufacturer tests a modded (I:E non-stock) vehicle and provides the time on a production car lists. I'll tell you, the same kind that cheats. Why don't they just add the whole nismo kit and call that production too? Nissan said they were going to the ring to test a standard GT-R and a V-Spec, and all we have now is a NEITHER.

The boost gauge shows boost when you're not driving? Oh, that's a new one. I can't believe those stupid Porsche reps didn't see that one...............


You are running out of excuses and conjecture and I know it's frustrating, but there are too many holes for you to cover here.

 

^those are some nice speculations...

 

here is the latest GTR test pilot, driving the new convertible GTR around the ring in 6:59

 

HAHAHAHAH crazy eyes... what a good man. his eyes help him see around corners better, thus shaving seconds in the total lap time. they fair better than the stock asian squinted eye, clearly a modification.

 

Notice again...no shoes on the car and no shoes on the crazy-eyed driver...very suspicious...

 

He never needs to turn his head. He can look forward and see what's on both sides of him.

And HC makes the point. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck...

 

exactly, so faster reaction time on drivers part. I think we solved the problem

 

But he'll need a co-pilot to look forward as he is only capable of the peripheral...co-pilots add weight...

 

all i saw was more crap about chris harris - as if he's the only guy who has ever driven a gt-r.

how many laps did he do in the car? how many did suzuki run?

and regarding the boost gauge - yeah, i think it was way too much to allow a person that you've invited to get in for 5 seconds to see what the boost is set at. i didn't realize you knew all the whereabouts of the porsche reps during their entire attendance. that's pretty cool. i'm assuming that's why porsche has been firing away about the same event. (sarcasm - because i haven't heard a peep out of porsche)

you must have some really super inside info. this would likely expain all of the superior knowledge you've displayed about a car you've never driven(that up to this point - i think you've just read on the internet).

but yeah, regarding facts... you fail to provide 'evidence' to back up anything you just stated. you state that chris was slower, but have no evidence to support why. you stated that nissan said they were going to test stock my10 gt-r, but then didn't... so? are you going to fire ghosn now?