Mafless
We have done a few cars this way...but really do not recommend it.
Despite what other way say, there is zero support for speed density in the dme. Do to the lack of airflow calculation (load) you are more or less tuning timing alpha-n and letting the wideband "fix" fuel.
Despite what other way say, there is zero support for speed density in the dme. Do to the lack of airflow calculation (load) you are more or less tuning timing alpha-n and letting the wideband "fix" fuel.
There is a mafless Protomotive car running around Houston now that is really strong. Went for a ride in it last week. From what I gathered Todd is looking to do this setup with a few more cars in the near future.
Listen to Tony, even if cars run strong with this, there is no substitute load value for the ECU when the MAF signal is absent.
We tried on mine and found no benefit ... the blow thru works well on my car...
As Tony said, not a good idea....
just my .02
markski
As Tony said, not a good idea....
just my .02
markski
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Trending Topics
I believe that was a 5th gear run and rwd.
Im running mafless and no problems so far.
Robert
We have done a few cars this way...but really do not recommend it.
Despite what other way say, there is zero support for speed density in the dme. Do to the lack of airflow calculation (load) you are more or less tuning timing alpha-n and letting the wideband "fix" fuel.
Despite what other way say, there is zero support for speed density in the dme. Do to the lack of airflow calculation (load) you are more or less tuning timing alpha-n and letting the wideband "fix" fuel.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







