996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Any news on the BorgWarner EFR turbos?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 02-09-2016, 12:29 PM
bsh's Avatar
bsh
bsh is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 20
bsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to all
I have an EFR 8374 IWG in my non-Porsche car and I love it. It have a nice internal wastegate with a boost solenoid included that works really well. No boost control issues whatsoever, using a standalone ecu though... It also have an integrated BOV. All integrated in one unit. Brilliant Yes it is quite expensive, but add a wastegate, BOV and a boost solenoid to another brand ball bearing turbo, I am pretty sure it wont be cheaper, and you still havent the lightweight exhaust wheel for excellent transient spool that the EFR have
 
  #32  
Old 02-09-2016, 03:10 PM
Aktavate's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno, NV / SFBA
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 29
Aktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of light
Is there any advantage to these over A28s on a pump gas stock motor car? Low spool and torque are already kind of danger zone on the tials.
 
  #33  
Old 02-09-2016, 03:33 PM
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 63
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
The hardware itself doesn't impost the danger, its the tuners job to properly manage tq and boost at all rpms.
 
  #34  
Old 02-09-2016, 04:41 PM
Aktavate's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno, NV / SFBA
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 29
Aktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of light
Agreed, what I'm asking though is that considering there is a restriction on the amount of tq that can be safely run down low there wouldn't be an advantage to using say a faster spooling turbo in order to gain greater torque down low as it would have to be tuned out regardless. So in my example what would be gained from one of these turbos that A28s could not provide?
 
  #35  
Old 02-09-2016, 05:02 PM
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 63
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
The 7163's can push over 1000awhp, gt28 not same class. The aero is entirely different, 7163 is a lower pr design than the 28/30
 
  #36  
Old 02-09-2016, 06:02 PM
Aktavate's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno, NV / SFBA
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 29
Aktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of lightAktavate is a glorious beacon of light
So similar spool but the efr would be better for big power if building the engine later down the line? Sorry for all the questions just trying to understand the options available.
 
  #37  
Old 02-09-2016, 06:18 PM
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 63
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Aktavate
So similar spool but the efr would be better for big power if building the engine later down the line? Sorry for all the questions just trying to understand the options available.
Correct.
 
  #38  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:03 PM
32krazy!'s Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: tn
Age: 62
Posts: 5,551
Rep Power: 626
32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by zero400
If you knew the background on that testing you'd know it had issues. No way this turbo spools faster than a 3071 let's be honest here and cut the crap marketing. Seeing posts like this from forum marketeers turns me off personally right away. This setup that itguy made with 7163s is nice as its bolton but it isn't the end all be all for everyone especially not for those looking for stock motor street performance and quick response that a set of 28s or 3071s can provide with plenty of power to max the stock motor setup. As for me I prefer external wastegates and no they don't make ear deafening noise at all. I take it you have never been in a 996 or 997 with dumps at all. I will also never trust an N75 valve over a Mac valve or that built in diverter over a blow off. Lessons learned from the past that I just don't need to live through again. I love this set up for its bolt on nature and price but its right in line with a set of GTX3076 turbos from every angle you look at. If a decent shop makes you headers for EWGs and adds a y-pipe with BOVs you are roughly in the same ballpark price and power wise. Anyone have any stock motor dynos to compare these with alphas or gtxs or precisions on a 3.6l or 3.8l back to back? I'd love to see it especially 3071 that someone mentioned.
im not sure why the hostility. as i said i ran both 3071 and 3073 before the 7163 setup thats going into my car now. both tials with precision external w/g and turbosmart w/g. so lets do your math. tial 3071 turbos run 5600$ a set of precision w/g are 500$ the gmg headers i had were 1500$ labor to install v bands was 1 hr at 100$ per. also add dumps. tial bov (2) was 500$ custom y pipe was 1000$ thats a total 9200$ for the exact setup you want so bad. im keeping my y bpipe and bov so lets deduct 1500 for a total of 7700$ the 7163 turbos retail for 5000$ ALL IN. a savings of 2700$ and they have more power than either of the tials i had. darrins turbo spools 1 bar boost 3300 with his 7163 setup. almost 500 rpm faster than my 3071 did. im also on proefi so we monitor everything. simply put the 7163 are a better all around turbo . as for noise i run a 3" catless exhaust w/ w/g dumps right to the ground. with the chatter from the c/f triple disk clutch and the catless exhaust its obvious i dont care what they sound like.

im not sure what you drove in the past but those prices are what the porsche market holds. if its not to your liking maybe this isnt the car for you. i hope that clears things up forn you since i actually had all of these turbos and you havent
 
  #39  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:09 PM
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 63
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
it's funny that zero400 doesnt trust the internal recirc valve, he must know something the Porsche/BW engineers don't seeing as its the exact same part/valve on the stock VTG...
 
  #40  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:17 PM
flewis763's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 829
Rep Power: 74
flewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by itguy
it's funny that zero400 doesnt trust the internal recirc valve, he must know something the Porsche/BW engineers don't seeing as its the exact same part/valve on the stock VTG...
Haha true. I can say I switched to billet covers on them just bought a few guys had broken the plastic nips of when doing stuff underhand on car but they are fair cheap and not a must. The internal gates do have a limit of flow but you can do a minor port job on the recirculation hole to get more flow of needed........I did port one before and is easy to do but even in that case it was not needed, I was already porting the rest of the turbo
 
  #41  
Old 02-09-2016, 07:22 PM
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 63
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by flewis763
Haha true. I can say I switched to billet covers on them just bought a few guys had broken the plastic nips of when doing stuff underhand on car but they are fair cheap and not a must. The internal gates do have a limit of flow but you can do a minor port job on the recirculation hole to get more flow of needed........I did port one before and is easy to do but even in that case it was not needed, I was already porting the rest of the turbo
There really isn't a flow issue on the internally gated hotside. If anything keeping the large flapper shut has been an issue as its so large the pressure on such a large flapper overcomes the standard gates at relatively low boost. 25psi or dual ported internal gates are a must to run over 3:1 pr

We are lucky to have a relationship with some of the big shops at the speedway here in Vegas, one of which has been working closely with BW collecting real world data to better the EFR line.
 
  #42  
Old 02-09-2016, 09:09 PM
LQQK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 45
Posts: 456
Rep Power: 69
LQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond repute
I love everything I have read about the EFR turbos - and love Sean - but think it's un proven how the big AR will spool on what is effectively a 1.8L engine. (A stock, low compression engine) ......
Because of the ar I expect the PR to improve over the tials which are .63 (or smaller when compared to the vband) housings.

Yes the areo and material is better - much better. And I've heard nothing but great things about the transient response. I'm excited to see the results.
 
  #43  
Old 02-09-2016, 09:30 PM
zero400's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Age: 57
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
zero400 is a glorious beacon of lightzero400 is a glorious beacon of lightzero400 is a glorious beacon of lightzero400 is a glorious beacon of lightzero400 is a glorious beacon of light
Originally Posted by itguy
Correct.
Poking at me with those comments calling me a biggot? On what merrit, that I joined about a month back? I see.

What's "correct" above exactly? 28s now spool 'similar' to this 7163 setup. Are you serious? Its at least 800-1000rpm difference between them. Completely different leagues. If your goal is 1000+ they are a great option. They are not as spool happy period. Post a stock motor dyno and let's talk again then.

I don't know why this great option you are making for those looking for this particular turbo is suddenly being positioned as the end all be all. Enlighten me?

In terms of all that you listed parts wise I just want an equal length header, external gates and bovs. How many serious street or drag setups are running on this sort of internal gate or built in bpv style setup? Please let's not go there. EFRs are not even on the map other than sounding cool on paper with all the gadgetry.

Gt30 turbine old tech has proven itself rock solid reliable and spools just the same. Is it their problem they figured it out so long ago?

Let's not pointlessly argue and show some valid comparison results unlike the perrin article. If you were part of the Subaru community back then you'd know why it turned out to be flawed. Google is your friend.
 
  #44  
Old 02-09-2016, 09:59 PM
flewis763's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 829
Rep Power: 74
flewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by itguy
There really isn't a flow issue on the internally gated hotside. If anything keeping the large flapper shut has been an issue as its so large the pressure on such a large flapper overcomes the standard gates at relatively low boost. 25psi or dual ported internal gates are a must to run over 3:1 pr

We are lucky to have a relationship with some of the big shops at the speedway here in Vegas, one of which has been working closely with BW collecting real world data to better the EFR line.
I was talking about the bov recirc port not the wastegate. Gates are very large
 
  #45  
Old 02-09-2016, 10:10 PM
flewis763's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 829
Rep Power: 74
flewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond reputeflewis763 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by zero400
Poking at me with those comments calling me a biggot? On what merrit, that I joined about a month back? I see.

What's "correct" above exactly? 28s now spool 'similar' to this 7163 setup. Are you serious? Its at least 800-1000rpm difference between them. Completely different leagues. If your goal is 1000+ they are a great option. They are not as spool happy period. Post a stock motor dyno and let's talk again then.

I don't know why this great option you are making for those looking for this particular turbo is suddenly being positioned as the end all be all. Enlighten me?

In terms of all that you listed parts wise I just want an equal length header, external gates and bovs. How many serious street or drag setups are running on this sort of internal gate or built in bpv style setup? Please let's not go there. EFRs are not even on the map other than sounding cool on paper with all the gadgetry.

Gt30 turbine old tech has proven itself rock solid reliable and spools just the same. Is it their problem they figured it out so long ago?

Let's not pointlessly argue and show some valid comparison results unlike the perrin article. If you were part of the Subaru community back then you'd know why it turned out to be flawed. Google is your friend.
A 7163 will spool a tad slower than a a28 yes but I'd still take an efr over an alpha turbo but to each his one.
On the flip side here I'd a video of some 6258s for ya built by a bender on this site so you can ask for real world experience from them.
https://youtu.be/Gh8YPekzdZ8
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Any news on the BorgWarner EFR turbos?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.