Turbo Outlet Size and Intake piping (post-turbo)
Turbo Outlet Size and Intake piping (post-turbo)
I am a bit confused when I measured the outlet size of a GT30 I got. The outlet size is ~2". If the outlet size of this GT30 is 2" (as as I understand it the GT35 outlet is the same size), why do people need to upgrade the thickness of their piping (post turbo)? I think OEM piping is ~2.2". I can understand getting rid of kinks and shaping parts to flow best, but I do not understand why people go to 2.5" more or less 3" intake piping (post turbo)?
Any explanations are appreciated. Thank you!
Any explanations are appreciated. Thank you!
cause - if it's bigger it must be better, if it's better you can sell it. duhhhh...
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
Well....thats just it! Most people expect that bigger is better. and it is a good sales pitch. however you are messing with velocity of air flow which at a certain point is important. not to mention the constant upsize and downsize creates eddies and turbulence which further disrupts air flow and velocity. i agree sometimes bigger is better just cuz it looks or sounds cool.
however the fact is that uniformity and smooth transitions and turns are the goal.
Flow=Pressure/Resistance
however the fact is that uniformity and smooth transitions and turns are the goal.
Flow=Pressure/Resistance
It is based in cfm. you need to move X amount of air and burn X amount of fuel to make X amount of HP. Its that easy. The hard part is to know how much the bends effect the cfm and the temp too. bends are restrictions and cause heat build up plus stall the air flow. To big and you are just filling big void with air. Is bigger better?? The strippers say so! not the dyno.
Trending Topics
I look at it as "volume". Kind of like a "waiting room" for compessed air. The more air you can have backed up, ready to be shoved into the chamber, the better. Plus it has more time to cool off...wired logic, but....seat of the pants you notice it, so it's not BS...
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
....but the bigger piping on my car got me 80whp sooner with 600 rpm of quicker spool...defies logic...
on the inlet yes. you want the leas amount of vacuum possible in those pipes during spool. if you have vac in the turbo inlet pipes - you can improve. nothing logic defying here.
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
As far as I know, on ttboost's last upgrade he was using our 2.5" x 75MM Y-Pipe and our intercoolers with 2.5" inlets/outlets along with the fresh air inlet pipes.
__________________
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials facebook SpeedTech Exhaust Videos
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials facebook SpeedTech Exhaust Videos
I believe they go hand in hand BUT I believe and go by that velocity is more important then volume, if it doesnt create friction and heat build on the inner surface from being too small of a dia./path,, velocity will make a better fill and stronger flow stream...IMO..
John, We have always been told of power increases on dynos when modified cars with larger turbos and higher boost have been upgraded with our intercoolers with larger end tank openings combined with our Y-Pipe/75mm plenum set-up. IMO, this only stands to reason as the OEM piping was designed for K16 turbos running .7-.8 bar of boost.
Modified cars with larger turbos such as GT28's, K24/18G, GT30, etc., then pushed to 1.4 - 1.5 bar of boost are flowing significantly more air than the OEM piping was designed for, so the question is "are the OEM post turbo pipes and intercooler openings sufficient in size to accomodate all this extra air without restricting it or is larger plumbing required post turbo to match the increased volume of air being pushed to the motor with the significantly larger turbos at double the OEM boost level?" I am not a flow dynamics expert, but from what we have seen and heard from customers dynos, it seems the larger piping is making more power than the OEM piping in these applications in back to back tests. Personally, I'll stick with my fully upgraded intake path with my full supporting modded K24/18G car and be very comfortable with this choice.
Modified cars with larger turbos such as GT28's, K24/18G, GT30, etc., then pushed to 1.4 - 1.5 bar of boost are flowing significantly more air than the OEM piping was designed for, so the question is "are the OEM post turbo pipes and intercooler openings sufficient in size to accomodate all this extra air without restricting it or is larger plumbing required post turbo to match the increased volume of air being pushed to the motor with the significantly larger turbos at double the OEM boost level?" I am not a flow dynamics expert, but from what we have seen and heard from customers dynos, it seems the larger piping is making more power than the OEM piping in these applications in back to back tests. Personally, I'll stick with my fully upgraded intake path with my full supporting modded K24/18G car and be very comfortable with this choice.
__________________
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials facebook SpeedTech Exhaust Videos
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials facebook SpeedTech Exhaust Videos
John, We have always been told of power increases on dynos when modified cars with larger turbos and higher boost have been upgraded with our intercoolers with larger end tank openings combined with our Y-Pipe/75mm plenum set-up. IMO, this only stands to reason as the OEM piping was designed for K16 turbos running .7-.8 bar of boost.
Modified cars with larger turbos such as GT28's, K24/18G, GT30, etc., then pushed to 1.4 - 1.5 bar of boost are flowing significantly more air than the OEM piping was designed for, so the question is "are the OEM post turbo pipes and intercooler openings sufficient in size to accomodate all this extra air without restricting it or is larger plumbing required post turbo to match the increased volume of air being pushed to the motor with the significantly larger turbos at double the OEM boost level?" I am not a flow dynamics expert, but from what we have seen and heard from customers dynos, it seems the larger piping is making more power than the OEM piping in these applications in back to back tests. Personally, I'll stick with my fully upgraded intake path with my full supporting modded K24/18G car and be very comfortable with this choice.
Modified cars with larger turbos such as GT28's, K24/18G, GT30, etc., then pushed to 1.4 - 1.5 bar of boost are flowing significantly more air than the OEM piping was designed for, so the question is "are the OEM post turbo pipes and intercooler openings sufficient in size to accomodate all this extra air without restricting it or is larger plumbing required post turbo to match the increased volume of air being pushed to the motor with the significantly larger turbos at double the OEM boost level?" I am not a flow dynamics expert, but from what we have seen and heard from customers dynos, it seems the larger piping is making more power than the OEM piping in these applications in back to back tests. Personally, I'll stick with my fully upgraded intake path with my full supporting modded K24/18G car and be very comfortable with this choice.





