996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

2001 TT Tire question - Front Differential

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #1  
bushman66's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 37
From: AZ
Rep Power: 16
bushman66 is infamous around these parts
2001 TT Tire question - Front Differential

OK, so went out and looked at the tires closer (Michelin Pilot Sports on stock wheels) and for some reason, the prior owner put 285/30 ZR18's on the rear, instead of the proper 295/30 ZR18's. These have a rolling diameter of 24.8" vs 25" for the 295's (from Tire Rack specs). The fronts are the proper 225/40 ZR18 with a rolling diameter of 25.1".

They have been on the car for approximately 2K miles at this point. Is this mismatch going to cause any issues with the viscous coupling in the front differential?

Thanks!
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 08:49 PM
  #2  
tgsmith4845's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 131
From: Marin County, CA
Rep Power: 23
tgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the rough
Hey Steve, Those rolling distances should be close enough. Porsche recommends staying within 1-2% to avoid coupler issues.

Tim
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 08:53 PM
  #3  
bushman66's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 37
From: AZ
Rep Power: 16
bushman66 is infamous around these parts
OK, thank Tim! I've been searching thru other threads and couldn't find a definitive answer. I'll swap 'em out for the proper rears when they wear down further...
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 08:54 PM
  #4  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
HI,You will have no problems....I have run 285/35/18,25.9'', and 235/40/18,25.4'',for over 22,000 miles with NO problems and Porsche Tech check my car over..They even say 'now' that .5 '' is acceptable..
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
nick49's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,062
From: Utah
Rep Power: 107
nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !nick49 Is a GOD !
I had Michelin PS2s 225/40 18 on the front at about 30-40% worn and just fit new Sumi lls in a 285/30 18 on the rear. All the specs looked good with published revs per mile of 829 and 834 respectively but the handling went to hell. My PSM would go on if I pushed it in a turn even non aggressively. It scared my wife once on the freeway on a relatively tight turn, the back tire slipped a bit and the PSM braked it instantly without warning. Also the car didn't want to go straight ahead and would continually hunt. It either wanted to turn left or right. If going 65 or above and wanting to make a subtle steering change, the car would turn in way too much and you'd have to correct immediately. Pretty scary and unnerving stuff. I spoke to my alignment shop and they said they could correct it. I then fit some new Sumi ll fronts in a 225/40 18 and all the handling ills went away. The car now handles better than it did with the Michelin PS2s all around with the rears at 50% and the fronts at about 60%+. The handling is better in the cold and wet as well. The Sumis are much more predictable and confidence inspiring as well.

The problem with the mix stemmed from using a very slightly taller tire on the front than the rear. This squatted the rear down a bit and dramatically changed the weight distribution and increased the caster angle at the front. Like driving a truck with a very heavy load in the rear will make the steering hunt. Anyway all is good now.

I'd say if you're too far out of spec, handling deficiencies may surface before you start damaging components. Good luck!
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:41 PM
  #6  
ard's Avatar
ard
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,981
From: N. California
Rep Power: 298
ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !ard Is a GOD !
Should be fine... your revs per mile are 929 versus 840, so a differnece of 11. 11/829 is about 1.4%.

Think about 315/30 and 235/40 when you eventually re-tire.

A
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:44 PM
  #7  
bushman66's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 37
From: AZ
Rep Power: 16
bushman66 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by ard

Think about 315/30 and 235/40 when you eventually re-tire.

A
That's the plan!
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:48 PM
  #8  
bushman66's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 37
From: AZ
Rep Power: 16
bushman66 is infamous around these parts
Thanks Nick. I'm wondering though if your ill handling might have been related to different tire makes front and rear? I've always thought this was a no-no, and more so with the AWD?

I believe the factory fitment is VERY slightly taller in the front (like .1").


Originally Posted by nick49
I had Michelin PS2s 225/40 18 on the front at about 30-40% worn and just fit new Sumi lls in a 285/30 18 on the rear. All the specs looked good with published revs per mile of 829 and 834 respectively but the handling went to hell. My PSM would go on if I pushed it in a turn even non aggressively. It scared my wife once on the freeway on a relatively tight turn, the back tire slipped a bit and the PSM braked it instantly without warning. Also the car didn't want to go straight ahead and would continually hunt. It either wanted to turn left or right. If going 65 or above and wanting to make a subtle steering change, the car would turn in way too much and you'd have to correct immediately. Pretty scary and unnerving stuff. I spoke to my alignment shop and they said they could correct it. I then fit some new Sumi ll fronts in a 225/40 18 and all the handling ills went away. The car now handles better than it did with the Michelin PS2s all around with the rears at 50% and the fronts at about 60%+. The handling is better in the cold and wet as well. The Sumis are much more predictable and confidence inspiring as well.

The problem with the mix stemmed from using a very slightly taller tire on the front than the rear. This squatted the rear down a bit and dramatically changed the weight distribution and increased the caster angle at the front. Like driving a truck with a very heavy load in the rear will make the steering hunt. Anyway all is good now.

I'd say if you're too far out of spec, handling deficiencies may surface before you start damaging components. Good luck!
 
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #9  
tgsmith4845's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 131
From: Marin County, CA
Rep Power: 23
tgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the roughtgsmith4845 is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by nick49
I had Michelin PS2s 225/40 18 on the front at about 30-40% worn and just fit new Sumi lls in a 285/30 18 on the rear. All the specs looked good with published revs per mile of 829 and 834 respectively but the handling went to hell. My PSM would go on if I pushed it in a turn even non aggressively. It scared my wife once on the freeway on a relatively tight turn, the back tire slipped a bit and the PSM braked it instantly without warning. Also the car didn't want to go straight ahead and would continually hunt. It either wanted to turn left or right. If going 65 or above and wanting to make a subtle steering change, the car would turn in way too much and you'd have to correct immediately. Pretty scary and unnerving stuff. I spoke to my alignment shop and they said they could correct it. I then fit some new Sumi ll fronts in a 225/40 18 and all the handling ills went away. The car now handles better than it did with the Michelin PS2s all around with the rears at 50% and the fronts at about 60%+. The handling is better in the cold and wet as well. The Sumis are much more predictable and confidence inspiring as well.

The problem with the mix stemmed from using a very slightly taller tire on the front than the rear. This squatted the rear down a bit and dramatically changed the weight distribution and increased the caster angle at the front. Like driving a truck with a very heavy load in the rear will make the steering hunt. Anyway all is good now.

I'd say if you're too far out of spec, handling deficiencies may surface before you start damaging components. Good luck!
Mismatched sizes and brands = no bueno
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
COBB Tuning
Automobiles For Sale
21
Jan 1, 2025 09:02 AM
2lflat4
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
2
Nov 18, 2019 05:05 PM
Enemy
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
9
Nov 10, 2015 08:01 AM
COBB Tuning
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
5
Nov 9, 2015 08:02 PM
JMon
Automobiles For Sale
1
Aug 21, 2015 08:20 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 AM.