Math help...
Math help...
Trying to estimate the 60-130 time for a Veyron.
Tests show that it travels from 62.1 mph - 124.2 mph (100 to 200 kph) in 4.8 seconds....so based off of that, I figure its 60-130 time would be 5.76 seconds (assuming .07729 seconds per mph).
Anyone get anything different? Thanks.
P.S. - I realize that this is only an estimate.
Tests show that it travels from 62.1 mph - 124.2 mph (100 to 200 kph) in 4.8 seconds....so based off of that, I figure its 60-130 time would be 5.76 seconds (assuming .07729 seconds per mph).
Anyone get anything different? Thanks.
P.S. - I realize that this is only an estimate.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Jul 1, 2007 at 08:22 PM.
Originally Posted by wross996TT
Too many assumptions (e.g., linear model) and of course no estimate of variation. But of course any number is an estimate...just not necessarily a good one.
I come up with around 5.4 using your linear analysis, and adding 8 more mph, at your .07729 seconds per mph. Assuming that's about an extra 6/10ths, and the reported number was 4.8. So not sure how you got to 5.76. But then again, doing this in my head . . .
0-100km/h = 2.5s
100-200 km/h = 4.8
so, 0-124 mph = 7.3
1/4 mile = 10.2 @ 142,
so 124-142 = 2.9 (which may include a gear change)
124-130 = 1/3 of that, so assume linearity between those speeds, and we get ~0.95 seconds
4.8 + 0.95 = about 5.7 I'd guess a little lower, because of the gear change issue, and the non-linearity, so about 5.5 - 5.6 seconds.
100-200 km/h = 4.8
so, 0-124 mph = 7.3
1/4 mile = 10.2 @ 142,
so 124-142 = 2.9 (which may include a gear change)
124-130 = 1/3 of that, so assume linearity between those speeds, and we get ~0.95 seconds
4.8 + 0.95 = about 5.7 I'd guess a little lower, because of the gear change issue, and the non-linearity, so about 5.5 - 5.6 seconds.
Trending Topics
I plugged in the points into an excel sheet. The resulting graph most closely resembled a polynomial. I made a best fit curve with a resulting quadratic equation. After plugging the numbers in, the approximate 60-130 time was 5.16 seconds. But actual times could be slower.
-Justin
-Justin
Last edited by Monaco; Jul 2, 2007 at 04:40 PM.
Justin,
Thanks. This info might help you with the calcs:
During the same run, my car went 62-124 in 4.23 seconds..and it's 60-130 was 4.9.
The Veyron went 62-124 in 4.8 seconds.
Using the above info...I think 5.4 to 5.6 60-130 for the Veyron would be a very close guess.
Thanks.
Thanks. This info might help you with the calcs:
During the same run, my car went 62-124 in 4.23 seconds..and it's 60-130 was 4.9.
The Veyron went 62-124 in 4.8 seconds.
Using the above info...I think 5.4 to 5.6 60-130 for the Veyron would be a very close guess.
Thanks.
keep in mind the veyron has a gear shift from 3rd to 4th at 126 mph, thus slowing down it's 60-130 substantially.
I feel if you were to run in to one on the street, you'd have one heck of a time winning.
I would estimate it's 60-130 at 5.6 seconds based on r&t running 60-120 in 4.7 seconds and the car gaining from 100-110 and 110-120 in .9 seconds.
I feel if you were to run in to one on the street, you'd have one heck of a time winning.
I would estimate it's 60-130 at 5.6 seconds based on r&t running 60-120 in 4.7 seconds and the car gaining from 100-110 and 110-120 in .9 seconds.
Originally Posted by dgussin1
keep in mind the veyron has a gear shift from 3rd to 4th at 126 mph, thus slowing down it's 60-130 substantially.
I feel if you were to run in to one on the street, you'd have one heck of a time winning.
I would estimate it's 60-130 at 5.6 seconds based on r&t running 60-120 in 4.7 seconds and the car gaining from 100-110 and 110-120 in .9 seconds.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Jul 2, 2007 at 05:13 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





