How many TT with 3.8?
3.8 Protomotive Air Cooler
The top secret part about street racing is pretty damn funny.
I think you should tear your motor apart and get the proper c_________t
in there. It is a miracle it has held together
.
I think you should tear your motor apart and get the proper c_________t
in there. It is a miracle it has held together
.
Last edited by WOODTSTER; Aug 30, 2007 at 03:30 PM.
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
KPG,
I think you bumped your head???
I also have a very conservative tune, this is what I asked for.
I have the capability to run more but I have chosen not to.
And dynos dont mean squat (hell if someone wanted to they could make a "dyno file" publish it for
great glory and dyno wars and then back it off for actual use on the streets.
I think you bumped your head???
I also have a very conservative tune, this is what I asked for.
I have the capability to run more but I have chosen not to.
And dynos dont mean squat (hell if someone wanted to they could make a "dyno file" publish it for
great glory and dyno wars and then back it off for actual use on the streets.
Only during your posts....We agree on something, dynos dont mean squat as you have proven
Is a conservative tune code word for slow.
Dont be bitter, you will break thru the 128+ MPH barrier soon enough and wipe my stg2 time away...with your "Full Heat Soak" dyno numbers.
BTW, why did you take the 650+RWHP Full Heat Soak Dyno numbers off your signature? Please bring them back
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
I think you should tear your motor apart and get the proper c_________t
Originally Posted by KPG
Pat and Vanna.... I would like to buy a vowel. Can I have an "A" please? Can I spin the Wheel of Fortune now?
Originally Posted by Jean
Do 993TTs count? If so mine is a 3.8 Ltr, at the end of the day it is the same engine case and crankshaft?
I have 832lbs of torque and 916hp at 1.9 Bar but I never run it there because of fuel price.
I have 832lbs of torque and 916hp at 1.9 Bar but I never run it there because of fuel price.
I think Rob got all excited, after all he has not driven his car for 2 years and came up with some HP numbers(attainable). I DO not doubt he will be very close to those figures.. and that time is coming very soon. Its Not his fault that something just didnt go right. Heck, just about every high HP car I know of has had its ups and downs... including mine.
I am nor excusing his statements... nor his actions... but I do know he will have one of few running 800+rwhp cars... and none of us can take that away from him.
Markski
I am nor excusing his statements... nor his actions... but I do know he will have one of few running 800+rwhp cars... and none of us can take that away from him.
Markski
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
KPG,
Your hilarity is only exceeded when people see your true humorous side in person
. Yes, my sole goal (in conjunction with Todd Knighton's help)was
to of course beat your stage 2 car. Todd, was skeptical at first but I told
him with the correct crankshaft choice it was not too tall an order.
My recent calls to H.P. Leib at Ruf have confirmed our suspicians,
You guys have leapfrogged Weissach and Herr Ruf in a single bound
(And let's not even discuss what your team taught RS Tuning in Germany
),this is nothing short of amazing and Ruf and Porsche have now built
dragstrips recently to measure trap speed only as the true indictor of engine
power, torque curve and of course correct turbo sizing.
Since you are the master mathematician and overall expert on everything
related to 996 Turbo Performance, why don't you plug my numbers into
your little calculator:
full weight 996TT with GT3 seats
New Michelin PS2's on 19" wheels (the experts told me this was a must)
.8 bar of boost produced 122 mph at the "Slippery Rock" 80 degrees F.
what will 1.4 bar produce ??
Will this "slow car" beat your old stage 2?
I hope to see you at Road America next year so you can show me
the way around the track in a fast car, this I would love!
You should be able to figure out how to get there.
I also on a side note bet $1000 that you cannot beat (time around Road America) the 993TT 3.8 liter
from Michigan a few posts above with the slow trap speed.
Are you a gambling man?
MK
Your hilarity is only exceeded when people see your true humorous side in person
. Yes, my sole goal (in conjunction with Todd Knighton's help)wasto of course beat your stage 2 car. Todd, was skeptical at first but I told
him with the correct crankshaft choice it was not too tall an order.
My recent calls to H.P. Leib at Ruf have confirmed our suspicians,
You guys have leapfrogged Weissach and Herr Ruf in a single bound
(And let's not even discuss what your team taught RS Tuning in Germany
),this is nothing short of amazing and Ruf and Porsche have now builtdragstrips recently to measure trap speed only as the true indictor of engine
power, torque curve and of course correct turbo sizing.
Since you are the master mathematician and overall expert on everything
related to 996 Turbo Performance, why don't you plug my numbers into
your little calculator:
full weight 996TT with GT3 seats
New Michelin PS2's on 19" wheels (the experts told me this was a must)
.8 bar of boost produced 122 mph at the "Slippery Rock" 80 degrees F.
what will 1.4 bar produce ??
Will this "slow car" beat your old stage 2?
I hope to see you at Road America next year so you can show me
the way around the track in a fast car, this I would love!
You should be able to figure out how to get there.
I also on a side note bet $1000 that you cannot beat (time around Road America) the 993TT 3.8 liter
from Michigan a few posts above with the slow trap speed.
Are you a gambling man?
MK
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
I think Rob got all excited, after all he has not driven his car for 2 years and came up with some HP numbers(attainable). I DO not doubt he will be very close to those figures.. and that time is coming very soon. Its Not his fault that something just didnt go right. Heck, just about every high HP car I know of has had its ups and downs... including mine.
I am nor excusing his statements... nor his actions... but I do know he will have one of few running 800+rwhp cars... and none of us can take that away from him.
Markski
I am nor excusing his statements... nor his actions... but I do know he will have one of few running 800+rwhp cars... and none of us can take that away from him.
Markski
Originally Posted by WOODTSTER
KPG,
Your hilarity is only exceeded when people see your true humorous side in person
. Yes, my sole goal (in conjunction with Todd Knighton's help)was
to of course beat your stage 2 car. Todd, was skeptical at first but I told
him with the correct crankshaft choice it was not too tall an order.
My recent calls to H.P. Leib at Ruf have confirmed our suspicians,
You guys have leapfrogged Weissach and Herr Ruf in a single bound
(And let's not even discuss what your team taught RS Tuning in Germany
),this is nothing short of amazing and Ruf and Porsche have now built
dragstrips recently to measure trap speed only as the true indictor of engine
power, torque curve and of course correct turbo sizing.
Since you are the master mathematician and overall expert on everything
related to 996 Turbo Performance, why don't you plug my numbers into
your little calculator:
full weight 996TT with GT3 seats
New Michelin PS2's on 19" wheels (the experts told me this was a must)
.8 bar of boost produced 122 mph at the "Slippery Rock" 80 degrees F.
what will 1.4 bar produce ??
Will this "slow car" beat your old stage 2?
I hope to see you at Road America next year so you can show me
the way around the track in a fast car, this I would love!
You should be able to figure out how to get there.
I also on a side note bet $1000 that you cannot beat the 993TT 3.8 liter
from Michigan a few posts above with the slow trap speed.
Are you a gambling man?
MK
Your hilarity is only exceeded when people see your true humorous side in person
. Yes, my sole goal (in conjunction with Todd Knighton's help)wasto of course beat your stage 2 car. Todd, was skeptical at first but I told
him with the correct crankshaft choice it was not too tall an order.
My recent calls to H.P. Leib at Ruf have confirmed our suspicians,
You guys have leapfrogged Weissach and Herr Ruf in a single bound
(And let's not even discuss what your team taught RS Tuning in Germany
),this is nothing short of amazing and Ruf and Porsche have now builtdragstrips recently to measure trap speed only as the true indictor of engine
power, torque curve and of course correct turbo sizing.
Since you are the master mathematician and overall expert on everything
related to 996 Turbo Performance, why don't you plug my numbers into
your little calculator:
full weight 996TT with GT3 seats
New Michelin PS2's on 19" wheels (the experts told me this was a must)
.8 bar of boost produced 122 mph at the "Slippery Rock" 80 degrees F.
what will 1.4 bar produce ??
Will this "slow car" beat your old stage 2?
I hope to see you at Road America next year so you can show me
the way around the track in a fast car, this I would love!
You should be able to figure out how to get there.
I also on a side note bet $1000 that you cannot beat the 993TT 3.8 liter
from Michigan a few posts above with the slow trap speed.
Are you a gambling man?
MK
woody, so you dont have to go to the other thread, here was my response:.....
The highest trap car that Todd has built is Scott and Mark. Apparently you enjoy living your life thru them. The difference is they built a big motor and you have not.As for my car running , it just goes to show just how clueless you are. These take time like Marks 1 year, Joetwint was about 9 months, Scott was many months as well. I realize your car was built in a day at least when Todd wasnt working on other cars that came in after yours
. Anyway, when you are ready to ask your wife for the funds for a big motor then we will talk but for now we have a math lesson. MK+AWD+1.4Bar+ PS2's will not beat the off the shelf GT700's. 138mph is a pretty high bar, but should be no prob for yopur Full Heat Soak Dyno numbers. Just curious as to how the gt700 with less power, AWD and no full heat soak dyno numbers are so fast... Hmmm. Why did Jean say your long G's just creep in slowly? Maybe since long G's are directly related to power, or in your case lack thereof. Anyway, your turn. This is fun.
The highest trap car that Todd has built is Scott and Mark. Apparently you enjoy living your life thru them. The difference is they built a big motor and you have not.As for my car running , it just goes to show just how clueless you are. These take time like Marks 1 year, Joetwint was about 9 months, Scott was many months as well. I realize your car was built in a day at least when Todd wasnt working on other cars that came in after yours
. Anyway, when you are ready to ask your wife for the funds for a big motor then we will talk but for now we have a math lesson. MK+AWD+1.4Bar+ PS2's will not beat the off the shelf GT700's. 138mph is a pretty high bar, but should be no prob for yopur Full Heat Soak Dyno numbers. Just curious as to how the gt700 with less power, AWD and no full heat soak dyno numbers are so fast... Hmmm. Why did Jean say your long G's just creep in slowly? Maybe since long G's are directly related to power, or in your case lack thereof. Anyway, your turn. This is fun.




Rob make it up to us & show us some of your work


, I'll hold off before I open my mouth though! you guy's a tough!