996 Previous model naturally aspirated Porsche 911 community. Discuss C2, C2s, C4, C4s, Targa and Cabriolets.

C2 vs. C4 996

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 03:31 PM
  #1  
laxaholic33's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26
From: Charleston SC
Rep Power: 17
laxaholic33 is infamous around these parts
C2 vs. C4 996

Tried to find some info on the standard C4, but there wasnt really anything at all. You guys seem to love the C4s though. What are the main differences between a 996 C2 vs. a C4? I understand AWD and all that, but im wondering what changes AWD makes in a 911...a RWD.

Ive been talking to a guy with a 99 C4 with 40k miles. Theres a few threads on here about MK1 996s with low milage tend to be trouble when you turn them from a garage queen to a daily driver. Thoughts?
 
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 05:33 PM
  #2  
Dharn55's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 858
From: Wilmette, IL
Rep Power: 66
Dharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud ofDharn55 has much to be proud of
All C4 cars have PSM as standard. It was not standard in 99 for C2 cars.
 
Old Apr 28, 2010 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
markar's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 401
From: rockville md
Rep Power: 41
markar is a name known to allmarkar is a name known to allmarkar is a name known to allmarkar is a name known to allmarkar is a name known to allmarkar is a name known to all
I have 2000 C4 Right now TPC putting turbo charger on it I love the car. i only put 3000k mile year have no problem for 5 years.
 
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 01:57 AM
  #4  
judgejon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 376
From: Mendocino Coast
Rep Power: 35
judgejon has a spectacular aura aboutjudgejon has a spectacular aura about
different driving technique in the C4. you can flow through most curves pretty easily, but surely paying closer attention to the road at speed. with the rwd you need to pay more attention to the rear end and point steer through the apex, just like Henry Watts says. Lifting off in a tight turn in either car is not good... the C2 could slid out, and the C4 will surprise you when the psm comes on and grabs a wheel. flow, maintaining balance, and paying attn are the keys to driving both cars on curvy roads at some speed. imho, otherwise both feel pretty much the same.
 
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 05:24 AM
  #5  
fourempties's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 466
From: PA
Rep Power: 60
fourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond reputefourempties has a reputation beyond repute
AWD is really just for snow on these cars. Wet road handling is not a problem like it is with front engine cars. Have you ever driven an M3 on a wet road? Totally different from a C2.
 
Old Apr 30, 2010 | 01:38 PM
  #6  
judgejon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 376
From: Mendocino Coast
Rep Power: 35
judgejon has a spectacular aura aboutjudgejon has a spectacular aura about
I read somewhere, possibly R&T, that the C4, even with the additional weight of the awd, actually turned better flat out track times than the C2. Depending on the track I suppose.

I got mine for lots of wet weather driving, but as we don't get much if any snow, I run potenza 050 pole positions all year and like the aa traction rating for wet conditions.
 
Old May 3, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #7  
laxaholic33's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 26
From: Charleston SC
Rep Power: 17
laxaholic33 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Dharn55
All C4 cars have PSM as standard. It was not standard in 99 for C2 cars.
How much of an advantage is it to have PSM? My blind thoughts are that a C2 without PSM will still be able to handle way better than a 325i or an A4. I dont really think that i'll be tracking my car at all...so i dont really plan on cutting around turns at 100+. (Still plan on driving it though)
I've found about 4 C4s and 4 C2s that i wouldnt mind buying if they check out/price is right. Plan 2 months ago was to buy this week...but it looks like i wont be buying till at least the third week in may.
 
Old May 3, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #8  
Codyk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 41
From: Jacksonville, FL
Rep Power: 17
Codyk is infamous around these parts
Is the c2 basically a rwd model and the c4 is the all wheel model?
 
Old May 3, 2010 | 03:54 PM
  #9  
judgejon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 376
From: Mendocino Coast
Rep Power: 35
judgejon has a spectacular aura aboutjudgejon has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by laxaholic33
How much of an advantage is it to have PSM? My blind thoughts are that a C2 without PSM will still be able to handle way better than a 325i or an A4. I dont really think that i'll be tracking my car at all...so i dont really plan on cutting around turns at 100+. (Still plan on driving it though)
I've found about 4 C4s and 4 C2s that i wouldnt mind buying if they check out/price is right. Plan 2 months ago was to buy this week...but it looks like i wont be buying till at least the third week in may.
I think most folks who track the C4 turn the psm off when running hard. What's important is to keep the same brand of tires on the car and not mix fronts and rears. I had to turn off the psm when I needed to run different tires on the fronts/rears to essentially use up some tread a few years ago. Other than that I just leave it on all the time. Hard braking on a fast corner will cause the psm to grab and surprize you, but hard breaking on a fast corner has never been good when driving Porsche cars. Imho a knowledgeable driver in a C2 will run circles around a 325 or A4 without much effort.
 
Old May 3, 2010 | 03:58 PM
  #10  
judgejon's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 376
From: Mendocino Coast
Rep Power: 35
judgejon has a spectacular aura aboutjudgejon has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by Codyk
Is the c2 basically a rwd model and the c4 is the all wheel model?
yes. and welcome to the world of Porsche forums... always room for more ocd's
 
Old Jun 20, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #11  
Cheekyguille's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 18
From: California
Rep Power: 0
Cheekyguille is infamous around these parts
would imagine

a bit better handling for the C4, but then again don't have any proof.

Know that AWD for Audi are deffo better handling for sports, does it translate to Porsche....anyone?
 
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #12  
Troy Jollimore's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 75
From: Halifax, NS, Canada
Rep Power: 19
Troy Jollimore is infamous around these parts
Wink

No. Audis are notoriously nose-heavy. The Quattro system helps balance them, but FWD doesn't help them much at all. Still a rewarding 'European' drive, but nowhere close to what you could probably get out of a Porsche.

The C4 is the 'every driver's' car. The AWD lets you accelerate from a stop faster at full throttle and is more stable in poor weather. It's very confidence-inspiring for the average person, so they tend to be faster with it. A 'race' driver in good conditions can get faster times with a C2, but it requires much bigger stones to take it to the limit and keep it there. When faced with a guardrail, most folk won't take that gamble unless they feel REAL lucky, and have the wallet to back it up.

A lot of 'enthusiast' drivers tend to migrate from AWD to RWD cars because they find AWD 'boring' after a fashion. They want the thrill of 'danger' it gives them.
 
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #13  
BiteEmNBeatEm's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 544
From: SA, TX
Rep Power: 49
BiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud of
Since we are discussing the 996 c2 vs c4 i have a concern. I have a 2000 c2 with headers and just the silicone intake tube. my cousin has a c4 with just the k&n cold air intake. well when we take off from about 15mph i jump out ahead in 1st and through 2nd but towards the end of 2nd switching into 3rd he pulls out ahead of me a good 2 cars. WHY IS THIS???
 
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #14  
BiteEmNBeatEm's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 544
From: SA, TX
Rep Power: 49
BiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud ofBiteEmNBeatEm has much to be proud of
 
Old Jun 26, 2010 | 06:00 PM
  #15  
auto-xr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 245
From: San Francisco
Rep Power: 29
auto-xr is infamous around these parts


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 AM.