997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Questions on interpreting dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 08:25 PM
  #1  
bonehead's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
From: Texas
Rep Power: 342
bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !
Questions on interpreting dyno results

Dyno gurus out there. Keep in mind, I do not have nefarious intentions with these questions. I would just like to know.

How can chassis dyno numbers be manipulated by the operator? Can numbers be artificially lowered or raised at will? How much is user error a factor in abnormally high or low numbers or are these things designed to minimize/remove operator error? I know different dynos yield different results based on how they calculate hp/tq (i.e Dynojet vs a Mustang, etc.) Is one type more prone to user error and/or easier to manipulate?
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #2  
vduzin12's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 253
From: SF Bay Area
Rep Power: 0
vduzin12 is infamous around these parts
seems like a sore subject
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #3  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by bonehead
Dyno gurus out there. Keep in mind, I do not have nefarious intentions with these questions. I would just like to know.
How can chassis dyno numbers be manipulated by the operator?
Software set up, hardware changes, incorrect calibration, incorrect weather correction factors....etc.

Can numbers be artificially lowered or raised at will?
Yes

How much is user error a factor in abnormally high or low numbers or are these things designed to minimize/remove operator error?
Dyno set up, calibration, strapping, fan placement, and actual run procedure can all play a roll in power figures recorded. Each one of these factors open it self up to "user error".

I know different dynos yield different results based on how they calculate hp/tq (i.e Dynojet vs a Mustang, etc.) Is one type more prone to user error and/or easier to manipulate?
Some of these machines are MUCH easier to manipulate then others. For example, a dyno jet 248 is basically just a spinning drum in the ground that measures acceleration. This makes it harder to alter set up and power figures. A dyno dynamics dyno however can use the simple key combo of "ctrl + X" to scale the whole graph by what ever factor you would like.




<input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"><input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden"><input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 01:21 PM
  #4  
bonehead's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
From: Texas
Rep Power: 342
bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tony@epl
Software set up, hardware changes, incorrect calibration, incorrect weather correction factors....etc.

Yes

Dyno set up, calibration, strapping, fan placement, and actual run procedure can all play a roll in power figures recorded. Each one of these factors open it self up to "user error".

Some of these machines are MUCH easier to manipulate then others. For example, a dyno jet 248 is basically just a spinning drum in the ground that measures acceleration. This makes it harder to alter set up and power figures. A dyno dynamics dyno however can use the simple key combo of "ctrl + X" to scale the whole graph by what ever factor you would like.




<INPUT id=gwProxy type=hidden><!--Session data--><INPUT id=jsProxy onclick=jsCall(); type=hidden><INPUT id=gwProxy type=hidden><!--Session data--><INPUT id=jsProxy onclick=jsCall(); type=hidden><INPUT id=gwProxy type=hidden><!--Session data--><INPUT id=jsProxy onclick=jsCall(); type=hidden>

Tony
Thanks for your reply. What specifcally about the 'run procedure' can give abnormally high figures?
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:12 PM
  #5  
Mitch@Vivid's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 115
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 26
Mitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the rough
Mustangs can be manipulated as well with factors like roller weight and parasitic multiplier.

Not hard to do and throws numbers way off.

Mitch
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 09:20 PM
  #6  
Neil Switzer's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,387
From: Oberlin, NE Ohio
Rep Power: 0
Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !Neil Switzer Is a GOD !
We have a Dynojet AWD setup, the MD's can be manipulated, much like Mitch said, to just about whatever you like, however they all load each car differently.

Pay attention to what correction factor is used as well, not all dyno charts are printed equally!

We specifically use SAE for reporting any dyno numbers, a good example is when hammer hit 915rwhp SAE, it was nearly 950rwhp on STD correction. Always look at the curve, before the numbers.

Look for real world performance numbers, such as the popular 60-130 and 1/4 mile timing breakdowns, while they can vary due to driver ability, pay attention to data logs to see how the car pulls through the gears.
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #7  
bonehead's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
From: Texas
Rep Power: 342
bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !bonehead Is a GOD !
^^Again, thanks for the input.

What's your take on this graph?
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 11:13 PM
  #8  
ruf_turbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,181
From: FL West Coast
Rep Power: 117
ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !ruf_turbo Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by bonehead
^^Again, thanks for the input.

What's your take on this graph?
Man, that looks pretty ragged in the higher rpm's.
 
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:55 AM
  #9  
Mitch@Vivid's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 115
From: Arizona
Rep Power: 26
Mitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the roughMitch@Vivid is a jewel in the rough
Also remember with that chart the smoothing value is at 20. It ranges from 0-100 so not much smoothing hence the jaggedness.

Using smoothing is something for another debate but very helpful in determining problems in the power band.

We have found that leaving a lower smoothing in Porsches really helps us to see detonation and where cars are pulling timing back, as apparent in huge dips in the curve that maybe missed when smoothed way out IE-80 or so.

Mitch
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eclip5e
Automobiles For Sale
6
Jul 29, 2019 11:13 AM
BlackMarketRacing
996 Turbo / GT2
16
Dec 3, 2015 10:46 AM
orbelo
996 Turbo / GT2
30
Aug 30, 2015 12:26 PM
vbb
997
7
Aug 21, 2015 10:17 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.