997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Upgraded VTG opinion please

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 05:59 PM
  #91  
alwaysturbos's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 67
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 16
alwaysturbos is infamous around these parts
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.

TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...

Thanks guys
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #92  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by alwaysturbos
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.

TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...

Thanks guys
When I did my vtg upgrade only 63.5 was available. Now I don't think there is much difference in price? If not, I would go with 65 mm w/ clipped turbine. The 63.5s are very nice turbos--very responsive-- and will give you sub 7s 60-130s.
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #93  
GTRNICK's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,677
From: London (UK)
Rep Power: 156
GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !GTRNICK Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
When I did my vtg upgrade only 63.5 was available. Now I don't think there is much difference in price? If not, I would go with 65 mm w/ clipped turbine. The 63.5s are very nice turbos--very responsive-- and will give you sub 7s 60-130s.
What are your thoughts on the CMS 68mm setup?
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 08:02 PM
  #94  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by alwaysturbos
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.

TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...

Thanks guys
I have ttdude's 63.5 vtg turbos (thanks Dave!) on my car - they have the clipped hotside but not the extrude. When I was asking Todd about getting 65 with extrude he didn't think it was worthwhile for me since I would be using pump gas. He said the lag difference would be noticeable unless using racegas/E85/methanol. Just send him an email and see what he thinks these days, who knows there may be some new developments that would change his mind.
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 08:52 PM
  #95  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by GTRNICK
What are your thoughts on the CMS 68mm setup?
I've seen datalogs of those turbos on a 997. CMS uses their own datalogger and it reads/calculates Load differently than a Durametric but that turbo pushed over 2100 MAF units compared to my set-up which produced around 1650. It was impressive but you have to contact Tom at CMS for the specifics about what other supporting mods are needed.

Originally Posted by The Bogg
I have ttdude's 63.5 vtg turbos (thanks Dave!) on my car - they have the clipped hotside but not the extrude. When I was asking Todd about getting 65 with extrude he didn't think it was worthwhile for me since I would be using pump gas. He said the lag difference would be noticeable unless using racegas/E85/methanol. Just send him an email and see what he thinks these days, who knows there may be some new developments that would change his mind.
Hope you still like them. Are you doing/planning any upgrades over the winter?
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 10:26 PM
  #96  
milou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,768
From: Cyprus
Rep Power: 111
milou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TTdude
When I did my vtg upgrade only 63.5 was available. Now I don't think there is much difference in price? If not, I would go with 65 mm w/ clipped turbine. The 63.5s are very nice turbos--very responsive-- and will give you sub 7s 60-130s.
And in some cases sub 6s 60-130 ;-)
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 10:35 PM
  #97  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by milou
And in some cases sub 6s 60-130 ;-)
5.88 to be exact.
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 10:46 PM
  #98  
milou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,768
From: Cyprus
Rep Power: 111
milou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond repute
Correct, i just got bored wating for another VTG car to come close ;-) Please don't mention Kercar's car who made this onece on 1,9b boost ;-)
 
Old Jan 20, 2013 | 10:56 PM
  #99  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
You made some huge gains! Did you ever post what's in the secret sauce?
 
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 12:11 AM
  #100  
milou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,768
From: Cyprus
Rep Power: 111
milou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond repute
Sure, i have posted all modds done on my car, extruded hot sides, y pipe and lightweight wheels made the difference
 
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 07:32 AM
  #101  
Tom@Champion's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
From: Pompano Beach, FL
Rep Power: 0
Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by milou
I run the 63,5 protomotive VTGs with extruded hot sides, i think i have the best 60-130 times on the forum using factory turbo housing. Also there is very low evidence for the 68mm CMS VTGs, one member ONLY had the chance to test 60-130:-)ONLY once!!! What about 0-100 ,1/4 mile, 200-300? If those turbos were good CMS should have test their own car and show their performance figures, we've beed asking for year now but the only evidenve is Kercar's ONLY run!!!
I've said it a million times milou....we do not test our kits for 60-130 times, period. Where we are located it's simply not safe to do and we will not put any of our own cars or customers cars in danger just to get bragging rights on the forum. We took our own 997 Turbo with the 68mm kit to the track, and ran a best time of 10.2...but kept breaking axels during the launch, so we gave up. I have a customer who runs his 68mm VTG kit in the low 10's, but chooses not to post on 6Speed. He's here...he reads the information, but chooses not to get involved.

We've shown proven HP figures time and time again. What more evidence do you want? We tune for HORSEPOWER. I have gladly published more data then I probably should have showing evidence of how much ACTUAL power our turbos produce to the wheels. From that information you can deduce the performance figures.

And sure, KerCar only did a few runs, but they were legitimate, they were documented, and they still stand as the VTG record.
 

Last edited by Tom@Champion; Jan 21, 2013 at 09:23 AM.
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 07:45 AM
  #102  
pete95zhn's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 886
From: In my garage
Rep Power: 123
pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !
Tom, did you get an answer from your tech guys about beckpressure?
 
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:05 AM
  #103  
Tom@Champion's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
From: Pompano Beach, FL
Rep Power: 0
Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by pete95zhn
Tom, did you get an answer from your tech guys about beckpressure?
Hi Pete....yes I did ask. We have measured back-pressure on the turbochargers only a couple of times...but each time was at higher boost on cars with built engines.

However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.
 
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #104  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
The guy that bought KerCar's 68 turbo kit (he beat me out by 1 minute) has done the 1/4 in low 10s at 135mph, and says 60-130 was high 5s on E85...

Wow Milou, didn't realize you were sub 6 for 60-130. Talk about squeezing everything out of the 63s!

Since I'm going to be using pump gas (94 octane up here) I'm not even close to 6s. That's why I'm hoping to see some pump results for the 68s before handing over the dough! And I will hand over the dough if the times show a decent improvement over my 7.2s on pump gas.
 
Old Jan 21, 2013 | 08:45 AM
  #105  
xbox_fan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 775
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Rep Power: 72
xbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond reputexbox_fan has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
Hi Pete....yes I did ask. We have measured back-pressure on the turbochargers only a couple of times...but each time was at higher boost on cars with built engines.

However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.
Hi,

Since your wp is down do you have any dyno's to share on your 65&68mm upgrades with a stock baseline?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 PM.