Upgraded VTG opinion please
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
What are your thoughts on the CMS 68mm setup?
To add to what seems like everyones else opinion on here, yes I have found the information on Vtg upgrades available somewhat vague in some cases, not all.
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
TTdude, you seem to really know your stuff. I have a Proto 100 oct tune and am considering the 63.5mm vtgs. Noticeable power difference w 65's & 100oct over 63.5 you think? Any pros or cons you can share w us? Im sure it been discussed before, but since we are on the exact topic, just looking to further elaborate...
Thanks guys
I've seen datalogs of those turbos on a 997. CMS uses their own datalogger and it reads/calculates Load differently than a Durametric but that turbo pushed over 2100 MAF units compared to my set-up which produced around 1650. It was impressive but you have to contact Tom at CMS for the specifics about what other supporting mods are needed.
Hope you still like them.
Are you doing/planning any upgrades over the winter?
I have ttdude's 63.5 vtg turbos (thanks Dave!) on my car - they have the clipped hotside but not the extrude. When I was asking Todd about getting 65 with extrude he didn't think it was worthwhile for me since I would be using pump gas. He said the lag difference would be noticeable unless using racegas/E85/methanol. Just send him an email and see what he thinks these days, who knows there may be some new developments that would change his mind.
Are you doing/planning any upgrades over the winter?
And in some cases sub 6s 60-130 ;-)
I run the 63,5 protomotive VTGs with extruded hot sides, i think i have the best 60-130 times on the forum using factory turbo housing. Also there is very low evidence for the 68mm CMS VTGs, one member ONLY had the chance to test 60-130:-)ONLY once!!! What about 0-100 ,1/4 mile, 200-300? If those turbos were good CMS should have test their own car and show their performance figures, we've beed asking for year now but the only evidenve is Kercar's ONLY run!!!
We've shown proven HP figures time and time again. What more evidence do you want? We tune for HORSEPOWER. I have gladly published more data then I probably should have showing evidence of how much ACTUAL power our turbos produce to the wheels. From that information you can deduce the performance figures.
And sure, KerCar only did a few runs, but they were legitimate, they were documented, and they still stand as the VTG record.
Last edited by Tom@Champion; Jan 21, 2013 at 09:23 AM.
Hi Pete....yes I did ask. We have measured back-pressure on the turbochargers only a couple of times...but each time was at higher boost on cars with built engines.
However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.
However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.
The guy that bought KerCar's 68 turbo kit (he beat me out by 1 minute) has done the 1/4 in low 10s at 135mph, and says 60-130 was high 5s on E85...
Wow Milou, didn't realize you were sub 6 for 60-130. Talk about squeezing everything out of the 63s!
Since I'm going to be using pump gas (94 octane up here) I'm not even close to 6s. That's why I'm hoping to see some pump results for the 68s before handing over the dough! And I will hand over the dough if the times show a decent improvement over my 7.2s on pump gas.
Wow Milou, didn't realize you were sub 6 for 60-130. Talk about squeezing everything out of the 63s!
Since I'm going to be using pump gas (94 octane up here) I'm not even close to 6s. That's why I'm hoping to see some pump results for the 68s before handing over the dough! And I will hand over the dough if the times show a decent improvement over my 7.2s on pump gas.
Hi Pete....yes I did ask. We have measured back-pressure on the turbochargers only a couple of times...but each time was at higher boost on cars with built engines.
However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.
However, the info is still pretty valid. At 30psi boost, we measured 60psi back-pressure in the manifolds. At 25psi boost, we measured about 48psi back-pressure in the manifolds. We only did these measurements a few times for a few particular cars as we were testing to see what type of turbine wheel modifications were necessary to get max power. Hope the info helps.

Since your wp is down do you have any dyno's to share on your 65&68mm upgrades with a stock baseline?




