not sure if its a repost, but good vid nonetheless.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=maFaWixdJ...related&search=

 

Nice! if it is a repost, I haven't seen it yet.

 

That's a pretty old video from when journalists thought the 997tt handled well LOL

 

I thought that review sucked. Jeremy's review of the 997 C2S was so much more entertaining IMO.

 

that's what gets me. When the car first came that's all you heard - only that it was so good, and so easy to drive fast that it was boring and had no soul. Now, the car is a disaster and unwieldly at anything approaching aggressive driving

 

So people are saying its a bad car now? im confused ..... I own the car and I have to say I dont think a Honda accord is easier to drive... and my 14 year old cousin can beat anything in it.

 

They never ran it through the course with the "Stig"

 

Thanks for the post.......very entertaining video

 

Porsche heard the complaints that the 996 was to sterile a handling 911, so they gave the 997 an edge and now everyone is complaining. Porsche can't win.

 

^ Bingo!!!!!!!

 

Very true. I was anticipating this episode so much to see where the TT would place on the power lap board, only to see Jeremy say that he would rather have a Ferrari and that be the end of it. I wonder why?

 

watch this version of it:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=C9655uAiH...elated&search=

 

repost, but damn good video. It's nice tosee Clarkson like something other than a ferrari or Zonda. 997TT FTW!

 

While Top Gear is one of the more entertaining "car shows," it doesn't change the fact that they are full of misinterpretations and wrong facts. I can't believe Clarkson's opinion is given so much weight, when his data is often outright wrong.

For example...40-60 mph in 1 second? Weighs less than the F430? Same length as a Prius? No wider than a BMW 3? Top speed 200 mph? All wrong!