Motor Trend Z06 Viper Gt Review
Hello Dock. I follow some of your posts sometimes on Z06vette.com in regards to the C6 Z and notice that you are a very angry man that the new Z06 will annihilate your TT in any performance measure.
Out of all the reviews, you take the one that is not the most optimal. Why not quote some of the other guys on this P-forums that have the car, or the MB forums, or the Corvette forums that have owned various exotics, etc..??
Please give it up and give credit where it is due, will ya? You are starting to look bad...
Out of all the reviews, you take the one that is not the most optimal. Why not quote some of the other guys on this P-forums that have the car, or the MB forums, or the Corvette forums that have owned various exotics, etc..??
Please give it up and give credit where it is due, will ya? You are starting to look bad...
Originally posted by SCvet00
Hello Dock. I follow some of your posts sometimes on Z06vette.com in regards to the C6 Z and notice that you are a very angry man that the new Z06 will annihilate your TT in any performance measure.
Hello Dock. I follow some of your posts sometimes on Z06vette.com in regards to the C6 Z and notice that you are a very angry man that the new Z06 will annihilate your TT in any performance measure.
Originally posted by SCvet00
Out of all the reviews, you take the one that is not the most optimal. Why not quote some of the other guys on this P-forums that have the car, or the MB forums, or the Corvette forums that have owned various exotics, etc..??
Out of all the reviews, you take the one that is not the most optimal. Why not quote some of the other guys on this P-forums that have the car, or the MB forums, or the Corvette forums that have owned various exotics, etc..??
P.S. - I couldn't care less about how the C6Z performs with regard to the 996 Turbo...so how in the world could I be angry?
Originally posted by Dock (Atlanta)
P.S. - I couldn't care less about how the C6Z performs with regard to the 996 Turbo...so how in the world could I be angry?
P.S. - I couldn't care less about how the C6Z performs with regard to the 996 Turbo...so how in the world could I be angry?
Originally posted by srika
yea if anything he is speaking AGAINST the 911 at the bottom of page 1...
yea if anything he is speaking AGAINST the 911 at the bottom of page 1...
Sometimes there is more than just performance, horsepower, and times that make us buy one car over another.
Originally posted by pdutta2000
I think all cars submitted to magazines for tests are ringers. Kinda like that SL55 that MB submitted a few years ago.
The Z06, however, has earned the right to be called a supercar. The performance speaks for itself. It is not just a drag racer...it can go toe to toe with any supercar out there on any track.
I think all cars submitted to magazines for tests are ringers. Kinda like that SL55 that MB submitted a few years ago.
The Z06, however, has earned the right to be called a supercar. The performance speaks for itself. It is not just a drag racer...it can go toe to toe with any supercar out there on any track.
that'd be interesting, cause owners have already matched the times any of the mags put up
The C6 Z06 is very fast for a $66k car
Last weekend a new Z06 raced a Renntech flashed CL65 from 50 and held a half car lead until approximately 160 when the CL65 started pulling by with a car length lead at 165 when they let off.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
Last edited by Cerberus; Oct 26, 2005 at 07:22 PM.
Re: The C6 Z06 is very fast for a $66k car
Originally posted by Cerberus
Last weekend a new Z06 raced a Renntech flashed CL65 from 50 and held a half car lead until approximately 160 when the CL65 started pulling by with a car length lead at 165 when they let off.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
Last weekend a new Z06 raced a Renntech flashed CL65 from 50 and held a half car lead until approximately 160 when the CL65 started pulling by with a car length lead at 165 when they let off.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
They are some serious machines, im thoroughly impressed
Originally posted by pdutta2000
I think all cars submitted to magazines for tests are ringers. Kinda like that SL55 that MB submitted a few years ago.
I think all cars submitted to magazines for tests are ringers. Kinda like that SL55 that MB submitted a few years ago.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...0&forum_id=100
Re: The C6 Z06 is very fast for a $66k car
Originally posted by Cerberus
Last weekend a new Z06 raced a Renntech flashed CL65 from 50 and held a half car lead until approximately 160 when the CL65 started pulling by with a car length lead at 165 when they let off.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
Last weekend a new Z06 raced a Renntech flashed CL65 from 50 and held a half car lead until approximately 160 when the CL65 started pulling by with a car length lead at 165 when they let off.
However, according to the passenger in the Z06, if they would have went just another 100 yards, the CL65 would have buried the C6Z by at least another 5-6 car lengths. The twin turbo AMG's are stout!
With that said, the Chevy is still mighty impressive for a mere $65,800.
The driver of the CL also stated that his car made 670 bhp and 900 ft-tq..Not bad for a stock chevy, eh?
Here is the video:
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....346FC&kw=2&p=0
Last edited by SCvet00; Oct 26, 2005 at 09:22 PM.
Originally posted by SCvet00
Here are the numbers. Incredible numbers for a 70K car, imo..
1.6 mile road course
Z06 75.4 secs
Viper 76.7
FGT 79.6
Here are the numbers. Incredible numbers for a 70K car, imo..
1.6 mile road course
Z06 75.4 secs
Viper 76.7
FGT 79.6
Gary
Originally posted by KJM3
Is that the best hatin' you can come up with?
Why not just give the Z06 the respect it deserves. It's no Porsche, but it sure beats the crap out of 99% of the cars out there for a mere fraction of the price!!!
- KJ
Is that the best hatin' you can come up with?

Why not just give the Z06 the respect it deserves. It's no Porsche, but it sure beats the crap out of 99% of the cars out there for a mere fraction of the price!!!
- KJ
Originally posted by gdctus997
Respect? Why don't you guys go to google and type corvette recall and see what comes up. I beleive there has been a recall on every Vette for the last 10 or so years. Face it -- American auto cos make lousy cars. Ford sells a $150k supercar that was also recalled. Why? The same problem seen on recent Corvetts; the frame doesn't stay together. I respect cars that work, not fast cars that are poorly made.
Respect? Why don't you guys go to google and type corvette recall and see what comes up. I beleive there has been a recall on every Vette for the last 10 or so years. Face it -- American auto cos make lousy cars. Ford sells a $150k supercar that was also recalled. Why? The same problem seen on recent Corvetts; the frame doesn't stay together. I respect cars that work, not fast cars that are poorly made.
The bottom line is that the lousy corvette will spank any porsche short of the carrera GT in performance and pretty much anything else out there, regardless of price. That is not saying that the corvette is better, but it is saying SOMETHING.
Re: Re: The C6 Z06 is very fast for a $66k car
Originally posted by SCvet00
The stock C6 Z and the CL were dead even up to 160, and at 165 the CL it started to pull.
The driver of the CL also stated that his car made 670 bhp and 900 ft-tq..Not bad for a stock chevy, eh?
Here is the video:
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....346FC&kw=2&p=0
The stock C6 Z and the CL were dead even up to 160, and at 165 the CL it started to pull.
The driver of the CL also stated that his car made 670 bhp and 900 ft-tq..Not bad for a stock chevy, eh?
Here is the video:
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....346FC&kw=2&p=0
Personally, I am even more impressed by the Benz considering its a 4500+ lbs ultra luxobarge that can slay 99% of the sports cars on the road.




