What's everyone's opinion on this? A 2007 CFS and 2005 Phantom are roughly the same price~only 20k difference.

Thanks.

 

totally different cars IMO. bently is the drivers car but the phantom is stunning when you see one. what will you be doing with it?

 

This would be a daily driver. I only drive 300 miles a month though, but am a fan of cars.

 

flying spur would be better. i think it looks weird if people are driving phantoms and not being driven in them. flying spurs are also very fast and more of a drivers car.

 

i agree, i love phantoms but looks weird not being driven in them. the gt and flying spur are awesome. honestly cant go wrong with either. i have 2 little kids and they will fit fine in a gt. i prefer the gt over the fs.

 

As they have said, Phantom is usually to be driven by your chauffeur. I'd pick Flyng Spur.

 

I actually drove both of those cars today. I would say that the CFS is more enjoyable to drive. It handles pretty well and has a good amount of power. It also has a nice quiet ride. The Phantom drives pretty big. It handles like a cloud and there is no road noise. The Phantom makes a statement and gets you noticed more than a Spur would. All of my clients drive there Phantoms. Spur is easier to park. I drive these cars everyday and I can say that you will be happy with either one.

 

Bentley built too many flying spurs they admitted it. While I love the GT I hate the FS styling even though they are essentially the same car. Phantom is exotic so if you want looks and exclusivity go Phantom.