BMW //M Discussion on the BMW M1, BMW M3, BMW M4, BMW M5, and the BMW M6

E46 M3 a dated car?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #16  
Russkiy_M3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 835
From: Bay Area, CA
Rep Power: 52
Russkiy_M3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by rooster3.0
Not at all. IMHO, neither is the E36 M3.

I agree
 
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #17  
marksk1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 344
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 32
marksk1 is infamous around these parts
e46 is my fav body style M! I absolutely LOVE IT!

And now that the prices have tanked, I will probably pick on up in a year.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 07:12 AM
  #18  
skelzy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 45
From: New York
Rep Power: 20
skelzy is infamous around these parts
My car still turns heads daily....And few cars will hang 0-60 and thru the twisties......Beautiful styling, 5 time Engine of the year for its class (3.2 litre) and one of the nicest interiors ever......Cant go wrong.....
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #19  
soon2befast4drs's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 24
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 0
soon2befast4drs is infamous around these parts
Almost picked up a Dinan one 2 years ago(low mileage, priced too high). I will pick one up in 2009 I love that car
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:30 AM
  #20  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
e46 m3 DOES NOT do 0-60 in 4.4 secs. ~5 +/- is right.

i think the e46 m3 looks outdated compared to the new one, buts its still one of the best designs bmw has made. they have new hits here and there, but for the most part, the new cars dont evoke the 'i like it right away', they have to 'grow' on you before you start to like them, for me anyway.
performance-wise, it doesnt stand a chance against the new m3 in any aspect.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #21  
M3-ADDICT's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,034
From: Northern VA
Rep Power: 0
M3-ADDICT is infamous around these partsM3-ADDICT is infamous around these parts
[quote=djantlive;1942720]
Originally Posted by M3-ADDICT
333HP, 0-60 of 4.4 Seconds. quote]

Is this true? I thought it was about 5-5.5 second 0-60.
The convertible does it in 5.4 Seconds because all the weight. The Coupe does it in 4.4-4.6 depending on the different atmosphere and driver.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #22  
NickyBlack's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,297
From: North Jersey
Rep Power: 72
NickyBlack has a spectacular aura aboutNickyBlack has a spectacular aura aboutNickyBlack has a spectacular aura about
This guy is ^^^

But i drove a buddy of mine's E46 recently and i'll admit it does feel slower to cars i've driven lately and especially my 2 own. Having had one i remember how fast it was the day i picked it up brand new in 2001 but fast forward a few years later time does take a toll and technology has improved as well. The horsepower wars keep going but i still miss that car and must say it is one of the best designs bmw has put out in the past 10 years. Amazing car and will stay a true classic.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #23  
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,296
From: SOFLA/NYC
Rep Power: 717
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
I don't get everyones hang up on power, after experiencing all of the power one could ever want, I find myself saying who in the hell cares?! It's not what I am after anymore, yes sometimes thrilling but you can hardly use it!

E46 M3 is fantastic, and I can still drive a bone stock one and be content with its power, it's just a fantastic overall ride and driving experience!
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 03:27 PM
  #24  
SoCal97M3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 110
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 24
SoCal97M3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by epbrown01
It looks very dated, but so? What makes older models look bad isn't that the design looks old, but that people let them get ratty. My head is still turned by a nice condition E30, and those are generations out of date.
EXACTLY!!!

I have had 4-5 people the past few months comment on my car (I park underground at a condo complex close to the elevator). They say "nice car...what year is that?". I think most just know it is a 'shiny BMW' and that is about it. Some will try and guess year 2002/2003...when I tell them it is a 97, they can't believe it. Again, not enthusiasts by any means, but they obviously 'liked' the car.

The car has been VERY well maintained and garaged it's entire life. So I agree, I don't think it is the design that is dated, I think it is the faded paint and general condition that makes the car look dated.

My 11 yr old black leather interior looks great, and the leather still feels good.

There is a thread on here somewhere about a guy who restored a beautiful white E30 M3. That car looks AMAZING!!! I could care less that the design is 20 years old.

As far as E46 M3 goes... The E92 has about the same 0-60 time. The E46 looks aggressive and will still look great years from now....if well maintained.

SoCal
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #25  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
No.



The E92 M3 is clearly the faster car, but I mean anything sub 5 second 0-60mph... you're sweatin' if one steps you to you because if that "slower" car gets a jump, it'll be a while, well into reckless driving territory, till you catch up and pass it.

The E46 M3 design is the best looking M3 ever made, but it doesn't have the latest smooth, flush body panel fitment as the newer cars. This is most evident in how the front and rear bumpers attached to the quarter panels of the car. The E46 M3 was made in an age where the plastics don't fit as flush and weren't designed with more flair.

The design update gap between the E36 and E46 M3 was revolutionary. The E36 M3 absolutely looks dated. The gap between the E46 M3 and E92 M3... small.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #26  
PorscheC4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,245
From: CT
Rep Power: 289
PorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant futurePorscheC4 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by iLLM3
I don't get everyones hang up on power, after experiencing all of the power one could ever want, I find myself saying who in the hell cares?! It's not what I am after anymore, yes sometimes thrilling but you can hardly use it!

E46 M3 is fantastic, and I can still drive a bone stock one and be content with its power, it's just a fantastic overall ride and driving experience!
i agree with you martin! power is good, but any car in the 13 second range (1/4 mile) or faster will get you in plenty of trouble in short time.
my cayman S might not be the fastest car out there, but my god the speed through corners and turns is UNREAL! and VERY FEW cars can even come close to matching its capabilities in said setting. its def fast too (fast enough for sure) but not 911 turbo fast.
"power is nothing without control"
you def cannot use all these 400, 500+ hp cars on these roads, at least not to their fullest.
 

Last edited by PorscheC4; Jul 10, 2008 at 06:32 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #27  
epbrown01's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 196
From: Chicago, IL
Rep Power: 26
epbrown01 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
The design update gap between the E36 and E46 M3 was revolutionary. The E36 M3 absolutely looks dated. The gap between the E46 M3 and E92 M3... small.
Totally disagree! The change between the E36 and E46 was evolutionary; the changes for the E90/E92 are revolutionary.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #28  
empunker's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,111
From: Newport Beach, CA
Rep Power: 70
empunker is a glorious beacon of lightempunker is a glorious beacon of lightempunker is a glorious beacon of lightempunker is a glorious beacon of lightempunker is a glorious beacon of light
yes it's an outdated car. but it can still look damn good.
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 08:35 PM
  #29  
ihatepotholes's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 353
From: NJ
Rep Power: 34
ihatepotholes is infamous around these partsihatepotholes is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by M3-ADDICT
333HP, 0-60 of 4.4 Seconds. I don't even think the new Generation EVO and STI, and any of those cars will be able to beat that. That's another 4 years this car will be on top on the streets. Keep in mind, the M3 was made in 1999. 1999 Technology and still the best Performance and looks.
you are out of your mind bro . it will take a FIed e46 to keep up with a bolt on evo or sti. a C6 vette will **** on NA e46s. upcoming 370z tops off the scale at 3000lb with 330hp. these are CHEAP cars... you don't wanna look at c63, isf, gtr and such

i love e46 m3, especially the way they look, but sorry you gotta face the reality, its performance is getting outdated.
 

Last edited by ihatepotholes; Jul 10, 2008 at 08:37 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #30  
DevJ's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 104
From: Durant,OK
Rep Power: 23
DevJ is infamous around these parts
[quote=M3-ADDICT;1943303]
Originally Posted by djantlive

The convertible does it in 5.4 Seconds because all the weight. The Coupe does it in 4.4-4.6 depending on the different atmosphere and driver.

Are you kidding me? I had a M3 and no way (when it was stock) would it do 0-60 in 4.4 seconds! where the hell are you getting this info ?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 AM.