Why?
Originally Posted by Boxsterund914
With such competent mid engine designs like the Cayman and the Boxster, why would anyone buy a "retro" rear engine 997? They just seem so..... backwards.
it does not hurt to dream..
I have to agree with Jeremy Clarkson about the purpose of the cayman. It's price, specs all between the Boxster and the 911, a marketting scheme.
The car was not made to be the best it could be. As some people have done already, put the 911 powerplantant and you have a dream machine.
Last edited by BAD ASH; Aug 24, 2006 at 02:21 AM.
Originally Posted by shiggins
I the 911 is backwards, are audi's forward?

Bro
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by shiggins
I the 911 is backwards, are audi's forward?
911 driving is more involved. Cayman suffers too much understeer in my own taste. Other reasons, 4wd, 4 seats.
But I like the Boxster a lot, for 40k less than its counterpart 911 cab I take the Box.
But I like the Boxster a lot, for 40k less than its counterpart 911 cab I take the Box.
They are both great cars. Think about it; if it were'nt fot the 911, we wouldn't ever have the Cayman/Boxster to begin with. I love my 997, can't get enough of it.
That being said, my next car will be a Cayman w/DSG :!
That being said, my next car will be a Cayman w/DSG :!
Originally Posted by Mika_Hakkinen
They are both great cars. Think about it; if it were'nt fot the 911, we wouldn't ever have the Cayman/Boxster to begin with.
this is the mother of all parodies.
Originally Posted by Boxsterund914
With such competent mid engine designs like the Cayman and the Boxster, why would anyone buy a "retro" rear engine 997? They just seem so..... backwards.
Originally Posted by hueb2b
what u like isnt what everyone likes
Originally Posted by Frissen
911 driving is more involved. Cayman suffers too much understeer in my own taste.



