That's it. Excellent and very clever find.

 

So you are slightly lighter than a stock Z06 and also 40 hp more. That is right on with your 60-130 times. Z06 does it in low 8 seconds, your HP and weight advantage beats it. awesome. cant imagine what your car would do with k24/18g's...

 

Yes, but the difference between you and I is that with every one of his accomplishments (feel free to use the search function) I was among the first to congratulate Ryan and take him as a man at his word. Not once did I claim that he owed me any further proof or demand that he run some other test to sate my curiosity. I knew that he would get around to posting more data in his own time.
Those kind of demands are fine when someone is selling something, but not when someone is posting his accomplishments with his own car.
I believe on Rennlist, you told me to get off my high horse. You may want to take some of your own advice.

 

although there are many in here who are quick to lambaste anyone that isn't running proto setup, Seal Gray isn't one of those. he's been nothing but positive here.

 

I have given Seal some ribbing in the past but he DOES have the fastest verified K 16 based 60-130 on the board.

 

I do not want to hijack this positive thread-- but even your attitude has changed since your original posts.There were no demands made on you-- a request for SOME veryifying data was the point.My point here is that even with that there is still scepticism --so all your squaking about being singled out was exactly what was said at the time .Interestingly enough you eventually did produce some factual info that supported your case-- despite previously saying it was irrelevent.If you did not want to answer questions you should not have posted in a public forum.
All that said- you do seem now to embrace the concept of some scrutiny and accept questions without taking exception.

 

In general -

I think that cars with similar packages, even with different tuners, dyno about the same on like dynos. The big differences come with boost. How high are you willing to go with your boost for a dyno number. Those that are willing to crank it up, achieve the best numbers.

As far as 1/4 mile, 60-130, etc. - These numbers also seem to fall within a small range for similarly equipped cars. Just about every "fast" time for a given package has other contributing factors such as higher than normal boost, straight pipes, no exhaust, no cats, seats out, bumpers off, front diff removed, stripped interior, etc. - when you lighten the car, it goes faster.

TX has done a good job at lightening his car and it shows in his numbers - 307 lbs. is almost a 10% weight reduction - that is going to have a measurable affect on the performance.

 

I do not care who is Protomotive and who is not.
Now you are giving more info.
Your car goes well. Be happy.
Some of the big Proto cars are owned by ***** who do not verify
anything...

 

Ouch !!!!!!!

 

Rob,

Get to the Texas Mile and tell that crazy Polish guy to get his car there too.
You guys would EASILY be in the 200 club. Do It!

 

I just hope my ***** are bigger than Marek's LOL
Robert

 

 

I have to get in touch with Kevin to let him have another go at my tune. I'm stock with headers and a 91 California flash. Boost comes on early then fades from 2000-2200 rpm, blah, blah. How many iterations do you folks go though to get it right?

Cheers,

 

 

I dont know how much HP my car got. Never been on a dyno.
My 100-200 km/h time is 7,6 messured with a PBox and DB-Scanned.
Not all mods were onboard u see below im my sig.
Just tune, intercoolers and exhaust.
I bet i will get lower now, cause my car lost lots of wheight, about 40kg. The new OZs are not included!
Pure mass of the wheels is about 8kg, so 48kg wheight loss in total. But the wheels are rotating masses, 2,5kg per wheel in the back 1,5 kg in the front to the stock turbo wheels. The effective wheight gain from the wheels must be around 24 kg. So the car feels 64kg lighter.
My guess the time should drop to 7,2-7,3 sec. with stock k16`s.