996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Are you For or Against the Stock Air Box - Check This Out!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #31  
Chuck Jones's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 961
From: Elk Grove, CA
Rep Power: 89
Chuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond reputeChuck Jones has a reputation beyond repute
That's becasue some of the "results" for the claimed HP gains are done on the cumulus nimbus dyno which is calibrated by the sigmoid dynometer.....which means they pull the numbers out of the sky or out of their A$$.
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 04:34 PM
  #32  
Mikelly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,813
From: Spotsylvania, Va
Rep Power: 322
Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !
For me, personally, and one reason I was such a proponant of the OEM air box, it boils down to physics, simple math, and the restrictions of every design out there...

The name of the game is storage of AIR. In every box sold, you use the same diameter primary tube feeding the TB, So you are truly limited at the "funnel". I've always claimed "why bother"... Until I saw the Sportec, and now Dan's option here... This works, not because volume is increased. It isn't... However, the "feed" of the air charge is better, more constant, and because it uses the stock air box base, you benefit from the larger surface area of the OEM size filter, which was another pet pieve of mine...

Dan, are you reading my mind???

Now let's talk about those brake rotor hats!!!

Mike
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 04:45 PM
  #33  
torresmd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 598
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 71
torresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond repute
Well when I did the independent test with my M3, the K&N filter was bigger, claimed to have better airflow and the primary inlet tube was larger than stock. So seemed like a no brainer. It would have to yield more hp but in actuality, I lost 12 hp. I bet the engineers at BMW that get paid a whole bunch of money could explain to me why I lost hp.

Somethings are just more complicated than they seem.
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #34  
Mikelly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,813
From: Spotsylvania, Va
Rep Power: 322
Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !Mikelly Is a GOD !
On an M3, maybe it was... We're talking 996TTs... Just ain't so...

Mike
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 05:25 PM
  #35  
kilrgt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
From: Toronto Canada
Rep Power: 82
kilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to beholdkilrgt is a splendid one to behold
Good work Dan, I still think you are are bringing the "Porcshe Tax" down.


Wross996TT some understand you posts more then others... thats all.
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #36  
hardtop's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
From: Tx
Rep Power: 26
hardtop is infamous around these parts
Very nice unit with a great price.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 05:09 AM
  #37  
jcb-memphis's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,141
From: CIR PCA Region
Rep Power: 133
jcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond reputejcb-memphis has a reputation beyond repute
I think the next step, and a simple one at that given Agency Power's prowess, is to add "scoops" like what the GT3 and GT3RS have just behind the deck area to "pull" air into the box.


Would probably be easy. Just some sort of glue to hold them on and it would be done. Charge another $50 over the box as an option and perhaps 100 without a box.

Jeff
 
Attached Images  

Last edited by jcb-memphis; Sep 12, 2008 at 06:45 AM.
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 06:49 AM
  #38  
wachuko's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 215
From: Orlando, FL
Rep Power: 30
wachuko is infamous around these parts
Cool

Originally Posted by jcb-memphis
I think the next step, and a simple one at that given Agency Power's prowess, is to add "scoops" like what the GT3 and GT3RS have just behind the deck area to "pull" air into the box.


Would probably be easy. Just some sort of glue to hold them on and it would be done. Charge another $50 over the box as an option and perhaps 100 without a box.

Jeff
Another reason why I wanted that wing/lid combination for my car... I really hope some aftermarket company build those for our cars... but this is topic for another (already existing) thread...
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 06:50 AM
  #39  
wachuko's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 215
From: Orlando, FL
Rep Power: 30
wachuko is infamous around these parts
Cool

Originally Posted by torresmd
Why is it that the engineers at Porsche in Germany did not think of this. I mean it seems so obvious, ....
I think they did, for the 997S and TT...
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:14 AM
  #40  
wooosh's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 197
From: Nashville, TN
Rep Power: 32
wooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to all
Intake dyno

Having owned and operated a Chasis Dyno for the last 10 years, just wanted to add a few commments:

Independent dyno testing is great and necessary, but there are so many variables even when you try to keep everything exactly the same within reason run after run. Especially on Chasis Dyno. Engine dyno's are much more precise in controlling the environment, and take a ton of driveline components out of the equation.

8-10 HP fluxuations are common on chasis dyno's, especially when your talking 400-500-600 hp or more. Just because you bolted something on and the next run was 10hp down does not necessarily mean it was the primary cause. 20 hp is another story and should show up every time as something.

You need more that a couple of runs for a baseline. It must be stabalized. I often have to run my TT 5 or 6 times to get repeatable numbers. Changing nothing between runs, with idential cool down periods etc, and using an infared thermal gauge to check intake component temps, intercooler teimps and water and head temps, it often is the 4th or 5th run before the HP and TQ peak out. Whenever I see product claims with dyno run 001 comparing dyno run 002 or 003 I am skeptical. I want to see 5 or 6 runs with no change, then 5 or 6 with the mod. Pain in the *** but reality.

Traction can be an issue on these cars with this kind of HP unless you have a hub dyno and this will effect numbers, look at the graph carefully with rpm for slippage.

As far as intakes are concerned I have tried a bunch of them on the dyno on just about every of car that I have owned (who wouldn't, unlimited dyno time at my disposal)

THERE IS NO WAY TO SIMULATE OVER THE ROAD AIRFLOW on a chasis dyno and get it anywhere close to what a car is doing at 100mph, or 50 mph for that matter. Low pressure areas, intercooler effecientcy, all kinds of things change.

If you want to see if you intake filter set-up is a restriction, take the damn thing off and dyno, done that many times and sometimes see a change, and sometimes not. Just because on your dyno sitting still in the shop with a big fan on it does not make any more HP does not mean it will not flow better in real road conditions.

Give me as much cool, unrestricted air as possible because when we are flying down the road flooring it, it a a huge amount of air being requested. The Vivid airbox looks great to me, and the price makes it more attractive, and it sure looks like it will provide more available cool air than the stock design, if your motor needs it at the time.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #41  
tom kerr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,577
From: tampa florida
Rep Power: 211
tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !tom kerr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by wachuko
Another reason why I wanted that wing/lid combination for my car... I really hope some aftermarket company build those for our cars... but this is topic for another (already existing) thread...

looks like it will go well with my "duel ram air deck"


Dan send me one!!

 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #42  
torresmd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 598
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 71
torresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by wooosh
Having owned and operated a Chasis Dyno for the last 10 years, just wanted to add a few commments:

Independent dyno testing is great and necessary, but there are so many variables even when you try to keep everything exactly the same within reason run after run. Especially on Chasis Dyno. Engine dyno's are much more precise in controlling the environment, and take a ton of driveline components out of the equation.

8-10 HP fluxuations are common on chasis dyno's, especially when your talking 400-500-600 hp or more. Just because you bolted something on and the next run was 10hp down does not necessarily mean it was the primary cause. 20 hp is another story and should show up every time as something.

You need more that a couple of runs for a baseline. It must be stabalized. I often have to run my TT 5 or 6 times to get repeatable numbers. Changing nothing between runs, with idential cool down periods etc, and using an infared thermal gauge to check intake component temps, intercooler teimps and water and head temps, it often is the 4th or 5th run before the HP and TQ peak out. Whenever I see product claims with dyno run 001 comparing dyno run 002 or 003 I am skeptical. I want to see 5 or 6 runs with no change, then 5 or 6 with the mod. Pain in the *** but reality.

Traction can be an issue on these cars with this kind of HP unless you have a hub dyno and this will effect numbers, look at the graph carefully with rpm for slippage.

As far as intakes are concerned I have tried a bunch of them on the dyno on just about every of car that I have owned (who wouldn't, unlimited dyno time at my disposal)

THERE IS NO WAY TO SIMULATE OVER THE ROAD AIRFLOW on a chasis dyno and get it anywhere close to what a car is doing at 100mph, or 50 mph for that matter. Low pressure areas, intercooler effecientcy, all kinds of things change.

If you want to see if you intake filter set-up is a restriction, take the damn thing off and dyno, done that many times and sometimes see a change, and sometimes not. Just because on your dyno sitting still in the shop with a big fan on it does not make any more HP does not mean it will not flow better in real road conditions.

Give me as much cool, unrestricted air as possible because when we are flying down the road flooring it, it a a huge amount of air being requested. The Vivid airbox looks great to me, and the price makes it more attractive, and it sure looks like it will provide more available cool air than the stock design, if your motor needs it at the time.
I did three dyno runs back to back with my stock airbox, then bolted on the K&N CAI, an hour passed allowing the car to cool down then did three more runs and each run showed 10-12 loss in hp. Not a big deal and who really cares. I did this test for myself because I wanted to know.

I am just playing devils advocate. I also have an aftermarket CAI on my 996TT.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:47 AM
  #43  
wooosh's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 197
From: Nashville, TN
Rep Power: 32
wooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to allwooosh is a name known to all
Hey Torresmd, sorry if it came across as doubting your testing, not meant that way at all, I believe your numbers, especially if they were repeatable like that. I have seen some strange things. Would have liked to have seen your same test with no filter out of curiousity.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #44  
torresmd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 598
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 71
torresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond reputetorresmd has a reputation beyond repute
No worries, definitely did not take it personally. The M3 was a real pain in the *** to modify. I still have a lot to learn about the 996tt. I learn something new everyday on this forum.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #45  
roadsterdoc's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,932
From: The Woodlands, TX
Rep Power: 107
roadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to beholdroadsterdoc is a splendid one to behold
I want one Dan. I prefer this design over any.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 PM.