Ultimate MotorWerks Stock K16 does 480 RWHP
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,597
Rep Power: 332
ive got a 5bar
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,817
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 238
ive got a 5bar
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 318
From: Texas
Rep Power: 43
Dynojet's typically read about half a point lean. I have seen anywhere from .3 to .6 leaner. I think dynojet may have done this on purpose to compensate for what you might see on the street under different load conditions.
Justin
Justin
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,710
From: MPLS, MN USA
Rep Power: 466
It is not possible for K16's to flow that much power.
Do a 60-130 and trap speed for verification.
Enjoy your new flash but dont get too wound up in unrealistic meaningless dyno
numbers.
Do a 60-130 and trap speed for verification.
Enjoy your new flash but dont get too wound up in unrealistic meaningless dyno
numbers.
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 226
From: Charlottesville VA
Rep Power: 29
He's done a 7.92......
Ryan's car has proven to be a freak over and over again and his 60-130 time proves that even further.
I have heard nothing but GOOD thinks about Kevin and having talked to him will definately use him as my "Flash Guy". 
Once question is there a real mathamatical correlation betwen BHP and WHP? If so is there a formula?
SWR
Once question is there a real mathamatical correlation betwen BHP and WHP? If so is there a formula?
SWR
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,817
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 238
. My best ET is 11.64 or something like that and best trap is 126. My best 60-130 is 7.92, and that was done in the current configuration.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,215
From: Socal
Rep Power: 82
Wow man those numbers are really high - Congrats. The best numbers I got with a full stock car with just a tune is 400 WHP and 480 TQ Dynodynamics (about 448 WHP Dynojet). I am curious to know how it is even possible to get such high numbers, thought the K16’s don’t flow that much air. What boost are you running? Any other mods?
I know you have some weight reduction and that might explain your stellar 60-130 #’s but this I am confused!
I know you have some weight reduction and that might explain your stellar 60-130 #’s but this I am confused!