Ultimate MotorWerks Stock K16 does 480 RWHP
#16
03-19-2009, 11:29 PM
ive got a 5bar
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
#17
03-19-2009, 11:49 PM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,817
Rep Power: 236 
ive got a 5bar
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
and im putting in new headers this weekend
i actually dyno'd 499rwhp on a 94 degree july day... with absolutely no cooling fans going to the engine or intercoolers
a few people who have driven my car think it makes a good amount over 500rwhp
theres a member on here with similar mods making 516 on 91 ....
#19
03-20-2009, 12:13 AM
Dynojet's typically read about half a point lean. I have seen anywhere from .3 to .6 leaner. I think dynojet may have done this on purpose to compensate for what you might see on the street under different load conditions.
Justin
Justin
#20
03-20-2009, 01:37 AM
That's excellent power for k16s.
Don't quote me but I think Todd K. raised my rev limiter to 7400 rpm for my 18gs.
Don't quote me but I think Todd K. raised my rev limiter to 7400 rpm for my 18gs.
#21
03-20-2009, 06:14 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: MPLS, MN USA
Age: 63
Posts: 5,710
Rep Power: 464
It is not possible for K16's to flow that much power.
Do a 60-130 and trap speed for verification.
Enjoy your new flash but dont get too wound up in unrealistic meaningless dyno
numbers.
Do a 60-130 and trap speed for verification.
Enjoy your new flash but dont get too wound up in unrealistic meaningless dyno
numbers.
#23
03-20-2009, 06:38 AM
Registered User
Ryan's car has proven to be a freak over and over again and his 60-130 time proves that even further.
#25
03-20-2009, 06:42 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CIR PCA Region
Posts: 2,142
Rep Power: 131
Very impressive numbers with good data.
Makes me want my ZC gt2 turbines even more...
JB
Makes me want my ZC gt2 turbines even more...
JB
Last edited by jcb-memphis; 03-20-2009 at 06:44 AM.
#27
03-20-2009, 07:00 AM
Registered User
I have heard nothing but GOOD thinks about Kevin and having talked to him will definately use him as my "Flash Guy". 
Once question is there a real mathamatical correlation betwen BHP and WHP? If so is there a formula?
SWR
Once question is there a real mathamatical correlation betwen BHP and WHP? If so is there a formula?
SWR
#29
03-20-2009, 08:05 AM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,817
Rep Power: 236 
. My best ET is 11.64 or something like that and best trap is 126. My best 60-130 is 7.92, and that was done in the current configuration.
#30
03-20-2009, 09:08 AM
Wow man those numbers are really high - Congrats. The best numbers I got with a full stock car with just a tune is 400 WHP and 480 TQ Dynodynamics (about 448 WHP Dynojet). I am curious to know how it is even possible to get such high numbers, thought the K16’s don’t flow that much air. What boost are you running? Any other mods?
I know you have some weight reduction and that might explain your stellar 60-130 #’s but this I am confused!
I know you have some weight reduction and that might explain your stellar 60-130 #’s but this I am confused!