996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

TiAL Alpha 30r’s – Stock motor race gas results!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 07:42 PM
  #76  
jags911tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,771
From: Seattle WA
Rep Power: 225
jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by KPG
Knock it off Jag. You look foolish
Foolish!
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 07:47 PM
  #77  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
jags, anyone that knows anything knows of your vendetta against Kevin, you take every opportunity to attack him and your thinly veiled attempt here is as clear as crystal. There is considerable info I know and I do know about you

In respect to Tom, and KPG I will stop here, as I do not want to open any cans like you are attempting to do. trust me not a place you want to go.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #78  
jags911tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,771
From: Seattle WA
Rep Power: 225
jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !jags911tt Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Prche951
jags, anyone that knows anything knows of your vendetta against Kevin, you take every opportunity to attack him and your thinly veiled attempt here is as clear as crystal. There is considerable info I know and I do know about you

In respect to Tom, and KPG I will stop here, as I do not want to open any cans like you are attempting to do. trust me not a place you want to go.
I respectfully disagree with you. PM sent.

Jag

OP..sorry for the OT.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #79  
OS Inspector's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,496
From: Houston Tx
Rep Power: 187
OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !OS Inspector Is a GOD !
anyways back to regular scheduled programming.

i just wanted to say awesome numbers man love it wish they were mine =)
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #80  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by flash68
Great work Tony and Dave @ EPL. Amazing results.

I love how some justify to themselves their very expensive motor build when others put out huge numbers without it. And yeah yeah yeah it is piece of mind and all that, but we all know how expensive it is to R&R and build the internals with upgrades. If you don't necessarily need it, why do it?
I previously had a very expensive and very well-built motor in my P-car...but you know what? My next P-car will retain the stock bottom end. I won't open that motor up. I simply see no reason to these days.

Quality bolt-ons, a good set of turbos, meth/water injection and a good tune is about as far as I'll go. A set up like that in the right car with the right driver will hit 4-second 60-130's and go 200+ in standing mile. What more could you ask for?
 

Last edited by Divexxtreme; Oct 21, 2009 at 08:17 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #81  
vbmw335's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,215
From: Socal
Rep Power: 82
vbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I previously had a very expensive and very well-built motor in my P-car...but you know what? My next P-car will retain the stock bottom end. I won't open that motor up. I simply see no reason to these days.

Quality bolt-ons, a good set of turbos, meth/water injection and a good tune is about as far as I'll go. A set up like that in the right car with the right driver will hit 4-second 60-130's and go 200+ in standing mile. What more could you ask for?
Is this 4 sec even possible with the current setups out there? The best I have seen so far on stock bottom end motors are high 5 sec 60-130.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #82  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vbmw335
Is this 4 sec even possible with the current setups out there? The best I have seen so far on stock bottom end motors are high 5 sec 60-130.
It's absolutely possible.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:44 PM
  #83  
vbmw335's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,215
From: Socal
Rep Power: 82
vbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
It's absolutely possible.
If possible, that's great. Cant wait for more of these setups to prove themselves like the k24/18g's.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #84  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vbmw335
Is this 4 sec even possible with the current setups out there? The best I have seen so far on stock bottom end motors are high 5 sec 60-130.
It has been done but at 1.7 bar on C16.. not recommended on stock block...
I likewise share the same opinion as Scott that my next P car will have a stock block...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Oct 21, 2009 | 09:19 PM
  #85  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
I am hoping for a sub 5.5 on the stock block. I won't go over 1.5 bars however.
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #86  
onelove's Avatar
Former Vendor
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,023
From: Orlando, FL
Rep Power: 0
onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !onelove Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
It's absolutely possible.
Our engine has 66k miles on it, beat to hell. We've done some things to it that we thought would blow it, including anti-lagging 1.65 bar. So far so good, just a matter of running a great tune, and always having MS109 or C16 in the tank when you're going to beat on it. Until I see something different I'll hold similar ideas.

It's great to see properly setup cars running with stock based turbos running the same if not better times than those cars with huge turbos. I'm sure as time goes on we will see a bit more of this, especially with better tuning and additional advancements in fueling and engine management.
 

Last edited by onelove; Oct 21, 2009 at 09:34 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #87  
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,296
From: SOFLA/NYC
Rep Power: 717
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
It's absolutely possible.
With you driving it of course
 
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #88  
BLKMGK's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,949
From: Virginia
Rep Power: 575
BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !
Question

Originally Posted by topgun
I'm just curious as to why WE always like to mention that its a stock motor...If you have a built motor it's going to make the same power.. The built bottom end will only give you a piece of mind..IMHO unless of course you have head work!!!
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
you can run more boost and get more aggressive on the timing numbers thus producing more TQ... on a stock motor you cannot....
Wait a sec... a built motor is still octane limited like a stock motor on ignition timing unless you are compromising ignition timing on a stock motor to lower torque for fear of breaking something. I speak mainly of pump gas. Optimal timing is just that for any specific octane - more isn't helpful, once you pass peak cylinder pressure you lose power and then quickly get into detonation. A built motor can safely run more boost yes but that's not going to add timing either. Can you better explain this statement, it makes no sense to me. Are you also lowering mechanical compression when you do a build? FWIW, yeah I've tuned a few cars and understand cylinder pressure\timing\BSFC etc. This statement just confuses me is all so I'm seeking clarification...

As to this motor specifically, since it seemed to choke, could we get details on intercoolers and intake piping at least? Stock intake piping would explain much! 83lb injectors at 5bar should be close to 100lb injectors yes? 700WHP should have been doable IMO, this too confuses me! A/F? Were the injectors flowed? System voltage good? Full fuel pressure? Seems off for some reason. Seeking info guys, not trying to throw rocks...

P.S. Why in the world "build" a motor and not do any headwork? Cams at least? If you've got it that far down kripes do something to help it breathe!

P.P.S. I too am happy to see more power being made on stock blocks. I came from the Supra community and 700HP at the wheels was about where the stock cams seemed to be a restriction and a cam swap would safely get you 100more HP. No one worried about the shortblock much until you began hitting 900RWHP and then it was mostly the main caps as I understood it. This was on race gas. That was NOT always the case in that community! We got there slowly. So, I was pretty shocked to hear people in this community, on bigger 3.6l motors, fretting at the 600WHP mark. What is it about these motors that is so fragile exactly? Why exactly does anyone think 700WHP is hurting the motor and what are you sweating? Poor bearings? Rods? Pistons? These motors are a good bit bigger than the Supra, 600HP on good PUMP gas and decent turbos should NOT be scary if the motors have good rods\pistons. I am very happy to see folks like Titan, BoostLogic, and Justinn (others too) willing to push the stock motors more! Now, someone let me into the ECU please.... Okay one last thing after reading all this, run it rich and be safe, lean is not THAT much more power. Timing is where you find power - octane is your friend, detonation is most certainly NOT.
 

Last edited by BLKMGK; Oct 21, 2009 at 10:17 PM. Reason: Mo' Quesitons!
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 11:10 PM
  #89  
flash68's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,621
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 170
flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by topgun
Nobody is trying to justify anything, if want to crank you car up so be it.. there's been plenty of cars that have gone boom & some haven't. I built my car for myself, I do many track days & wanted the security.. If you crank your car up once in a while maybe you don't need a motor build to each is own...so why promote something "stock motor look" what does that mean exactly...it's not pushed? what? It can go faster? what?


Ben has a stock motor...all I gave him was praise on how great his car runs..If you put great number up regardless of internals great!
You just strongly question why people point out "on stock internals" when they make decent power. Why? Because EVERYONE and their mother used to say up until recently you have to build the internals at over 700hp. Oh really now? Looks at all these guys on all kinds of setups from diff people running 800+ crank hp on stock block... where are all these motors that are blowing up? Sure it happens, but where are the properly setup ones blowing up?

It's about the willingness and need to do internals up front? Why not push it as far as you can until a rod bends? Not saying you want that, but why do it up front (big $$$) when you don't necessarily have to? I can't speak for you or others, I prefer not to spend money until I have to.

Originally Posted by Prche951
just because you can, doesn't mean you should. I think a setup like this is pushing it on stock internals. There is no doubt that this kind of power will shorten the lifespan of these motors. You don't believe it? talk to tuners that have built engines, talk to Evoms, UMW, Proto. I am sure they have learned how much power these stock motors can take before they let go. It's one thing be a tuner, but it's a whole other thing to be a tuner and engine builder and you see what to much power does to an engine.

I have sa stock motor and I am limiting myself to what my tuner feels is the max power the motor can handle, which is no where near this amount of power. Can I go up to that. Yes, easily, but do I want to bend rods? no. If I can eventually do an engine build then I will go for bigger power, but until then I'd rather be safe.

but hey it's your engine.


the old saying, "if you wanna play you gotta pay" is so true here.
I agree mostly. But the limit is being pushed every day by different people and it seems to be working. Again, the Supra reference? Or are these Porsches "different" and "special" like many would lead others to believe?

I would edit your old saying to now read:

"if you wanna play, you can still do it safely but now for less money"


Originally Posted by TiALSport
wait a couple weeks, then do it
Dammit Jake, that is no help!

Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I previously had a very expensive and very well-built motor in my P-car...but you know what? My next P-car will retain the stock bottom end. I won't open that motor up. I simply see no reason to these days.

Quality bolt-ons, a good set of turbos, meth/water injection and a good tune is about as far as I'll go. A set up like that in the right car with the right driver will hit 4-second 60-130's and go 200+ in standing mile. What more could you ask for?
I like hearing this from one of our resident non-builder experts who has been there and done that. This is the exact path I am on for now. Not sure I expect 4's anytime soon tho!

Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
It has been done but at 1.7 bar on C16.. not recommended on stock block...
I likewise share the same opinion as Scott that my next P car will have a stock block...
hey there's another guy who has been there and done that and he is not saying a motor build is necessary. Go figure!
 

Last edited by flash68; Oct 21, 2009 at 11:14 PM.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 12:30 AM
  #90  
LamboTT's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 549
From: down south
Rep Power: 40
LamboTT has a spectacular aura aboutLamboTT has a spectacular aura about
I know my old 96lb injectors on my Supra were running out of fuel somewhere between 850whp and 950whp depending on the type of fuel used. C16 and Q16 took different amounts of fuel to make the power in that range and the injectors were about tapped out. The base pressure was around 40psi.

So depending on the base pressure in this car, I can see them running out in the 700-800whp range. I know Porsche uses a different regulator but this was a stock regulator?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.