996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

TiAL Alpha 30r’s – Stock motor race gas results!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 12:59 AM
  #91  
OhioGT2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,423
From: Incline Village, NV
Rep Power: 199
OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by vbmw335
Is this 4 sec even possible with the current setups out there? The best I have seen so far on stock bottom end motors are high 5 sec 60-130.
Switzer did 4's on a stock motor over a year ago. Markski, no offense, but DK has more dynos and WOT runs on his stock motor at 1.7 bar than days you've been in the tuning business.

Scott is correct, there is no need to build these motors on street car. And for anyone who thinks a built motor gives you piece of mind hasn't been in this scene very long. I will bet a stock 700hp motor outlasts a built 900hp motor 9 out of 10 times....
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 01:04 AM
  #92  
OhioGT2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,423
From: Incline Village, NV
Rep Power: 199
OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !OhioGT2 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TiALSport
that is one turbo

and there are 3 A/R choices, .63, .82 and 1.06
The torch has been finally passed!
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 05:38 AM
  #93  
UrbanHotrod's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,727
From: TORONTO/CLEARWATER
Rep Power: 330
UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !UrbanHotrod Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by OhioGT2
Switzer did 4's on a stock motor over a year ago. Markski, no offense, but DK has more dynos and WOT runs on his stock motor at 1.7 bar than days you've been in the tuning business.

..
Jamie, Was this in a 996 or a 997? at what boost? I just want to know for my own reference not scrutinizing at all..
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 05:40 AM
  #94  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by OhioGT2
Switzer did 4's on a stock motor over a year ago. Markski, no offense, but DK has more dynos and WOT runs on his stock motor at 1.7 bar than days you've been in the tuning business.

Scott is correct, there is no need to build these motors on street car. And for anyone who thinks a built motor gives you piece of mind hasn't been in this scene very long. I will bet a stock 700hp motor outlasts a built 900hp motor 9 out of 10 times....

interesting observation and you may be right, however, the curve above is not 700 bhp, it is well over 700 awhp, which is closer to 900 bhp. So in effect this stock motor is running at what you are saying a built motor would not last at.

Also we are talking a tune on race fuel AND Water/Meth. Sounds like I am talking about a top fuel dragster.

still no boost/afr curve for the above power curve?
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 05:44 AM
  #95  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by PALETTE
Jamie, Was this in a 996 or a 997? at what boost? I just want to know for my own reference not scrutinizing at all..
The verified 4.86 was on a stock block 997. I think there was a 996 based stock block that ran pretty close to that as well.

Switzer uses a standalone which allows for better tuning resolution and thus safety at these extreme performance levels.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:08 AM
  #96  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Another example of an argument FOR the stock block:
bad news boys.. motor is coming out again ( 1 2 3 4)
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #97  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
Another example of an argument FOR the stock block:
bad news boys.. motor is coming out again ( 1 2 3 4)

you beat me to it....

how many motors since I have been on this forum have we seen go back for "headwork"? or "new studs"? A LOT!!!
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #98  
audikp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 419
From: NYC
Rep Power: 41
audikp is a splendid one to beholdaudikp is a splendid one to beholdaudikp is a splendid one to beholdaudikp is a splendid one to beholdaudikp is a splendid one to beholdaudikp is a splendid one to behold
Hey guys, this is my car....thanks for all the comments and discussion. There has been a lot of talk about the limits of a stock block and I'm glad these results can contribute to the community.

Couple things I want to point out b/c I see a few people have asked....the car is running stock ICs and intake piping. Down the road this is something I'll likely upgrade but for the time being I have decided not to.

I drive the car 99% of the time on pump gas and therefore ~600awhp is the cars "normal" power level. When I track the car (4-6 events a year) I usually run a mix of pump/race fuel and the pump gas file.



Originally Posted by Prche951

Also we are talking a tune on race fuel AND Water/Meth. Sounds like I am talking about a top fuel dragster.
I can't tell if you're just making a joke or if you're half serious with thsi comment... With race fuel the Water/Meth (in my case 50/50 mix) is used for its cooling properties, not for octane boost. Since I'm running stock ICs the WI keeps IAT temps low and helps eliminate heat soak.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:43 AM
  #99  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by BLKMGK
Wait a sec... a built motor is still octane limited like a stock motor on ignition timing unless you are compromising ignition timing on a stock motor to lower torque for fear of breaking something. I speak mainly of pump gas. Optimal timing is just that for any specific octane - more isn't helpful, once you pass peak cylinder pressure you lose power and then quickly get into detonation. A built motor can safely run more boost yes but that's not going to add timing either. Can you better explain this statement, it makes no sense to me. Are you also lowering mechanical compression when you do a build? FWIW, yeah I've tuned a few cars and understand cylinder pressure\timing\BSFC etc. This statement just confuses me is all so I'm seeking clarification...

As to this motor specifically, since it seemed to choke, could we get details on intercoolers and intake piping at least? Stock intake piping would explain much! 83lb injectors at 5bar should be close to 100lb injectors yes? 700WHP should have been doable IMO, this too confuses me! A/F? Were the injectors flowed? System voltage good? Full fuel pressure? Seems off for some reason. Seeking info guys, not trying to throw rocks...

P.S. Why in the world "build" a motor and not do any headwork? Cams at least? If you've got it that far down kripes do something to help it breathe!

P.P.S. I too am happy to see more power being made on stock blocks. I came from the Supra community and 700HP at the wheels was about where the stock cams seemed to be a restriction and a cam swap would safely get you 100more HP. No one worried about the shortblock much until you began hitting 900RWHP and then it was mostly the main caps as I understood it. This was on race gas. That was NOT always the case in that community! We got there slowly. So, I was pretty shocked to hear people in this community, on bigger 3.6l motors, fretting at the 600WHP mark. What is it about these motors that is so fragile exactly? Why exactly does anyone think 700WHP is hurting the motor and what are you sweating? Poor bearings? Rods? Pistons? These motors are a good bit bigger than the Supra, 600HP on good PUMP gas and decent turbos should NOT be scary if the motors have good rods\pistons. I am very happy to see folks like Titan, BoostLogic, and Justinn (others too) willing to push the stock motors more! Now, someone let me into the ECU please.... Okay one last thing after reading all this, run it rich and be safe, lean is not THAT much more power. Timing is where you find power - octane is your friend, detonation is most certainly NOT.

Great post. I started to respond to the same statement and stopped because you can basically write a book on the topic and still not come close to covering the fundamental points.

In regards to ignition timing, there is only so much adavnce you can run on a given octane, compression, boost level ect. This has nothing to do with built motor vs stock motor, it has everything to do with physics....

Keep in mind running too little timing to "limit torque" and keep a tune "safe and conservative" can lead to very bad things as well... Mainly egt's that go through the roof.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #100  
bmoores's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,574
From: Houston/Manchester
Rep Power: 332
bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I previously had a very expensive and very well-built motor in my P-car...but you know what? My next P-car will retain the stock bottom end. I won't open that motor up. I simply see no reason to these days.

Quality bolt-ons, a good set of turbos, meth/water injection and a good tune is about as far as I'll go. A set up like that in the right car with the right driver will hit 4-second 60-130's and go 200+ in standing mile. What more could you ask for?
Scott,

This is the path i've taken although without running C16 and running 1.65+ i'm not sure i'll see sub 5's. I think I can get very low 5's. I'll have Dyno numbers later that will confirm the minimum power requirement to get to 200+ in the Mile. I want to get my setup to run 700whp consistently and safely on the stock bottom end and i'll be happy. I think the car maintains ultimate driveability at that level.
 

Last edited by bmoores; Oct 22, 2009 at 07:46 AM.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #101  
bmoores's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,574
From: Houston/Manchester
Rep Power: 332
bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !bmoores Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by topgun
Nobody is trying to justify anything, if want to crank you car up so be it.. there's been plenty of cars that have gone boom & some haven't. I built my car for myself, I do many track days & wanted the security.. If you crank your car up once in a while maybe you don't need a motor build to each is own...so why promote something "stock motor look" what does that mean exactly...it's not pushed? what? It can go faster? what?


Ben has a stock motor...all I gave him was praise on how great his car runs..If you put great number up regardless of internals great!
Tom I appreciate the praise it does mean alot. But my limitations for safe boost levels are where I begin to lose out to you and Kevin. As development continues that may change slightly but it will be interesting to see how the stock bottom end cars hold up as they are pushed.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #102  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by iLLM3
With you driving it of course
LOL...

Hi Martin.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #103  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by audikp
Hey guys, this is my car....thanks for all the comments and discussion. There has been a lot of talk about the limits of a stock block and I'm glad these results can contribute to the community.

Couple things I want to point out b/c I see a few people have asked....the car is running stock ICs and intake piping. Down the road this is something I'll likely upgrade but for the time being I have decided not to.

I drive the car 99% of the time on pump gas and therefore ~600awhp is the cars "normal" power level. When I track the car (4-6 events a year) I usually run a mix of pump/race fuel and the pump gas file.





I can't tell if you're just making a joke or if you're half serious with thsi comment... With race fuel the Water/Meth (in my case 50/50 mix) is used for its cooling properties, not for octane boost. Since I'm running stock ICs the WI keeps IAT temps low and helps eliminate heat soak.

just making a joke, but seriously, fueling wise you are as safe as you can get. Hence why Top Fuel motors can make 8000 hp. without the fuel they use, they could not.
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:23 AM
  #104  
justinn's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 318
From: Texas
Rep Power: 43
justinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to beholdjustinn is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Tony@epl

Keep in mind running too little timing to "limit torque" and keep a tune "safe and conservative" can lead to very bad things as well... Mainly egt's that go through the roof.

Wow.... someone must have been retarding the crap out of the timing

I noticed you also have a Cooper or 2 I have an 07S and couldn't speak more highly of the car.

btw, looks like Powell's car is slated for a today dyno

Justin
 
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:24 AM
  #105  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
The other added benefit to the meth, as I recall, besides cooling and octane, is it also reduces A/F a little, keeping the injector DC down a bit too, for those of us on the ragged edge.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 AM.