996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Gtx2867

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #31  
Old 04-25-2015, 09:08 AM
hydra.'s Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 14
hydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nice
Fadi,
Don't forget, you've got the new GTX29 turbine wheel midway between the 28 and the 30 for even more choice...
 
  #32  
Old 04-25-2015, 09:36 AM
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 991
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
Yes you are right, a few months ago was looking for specs regarding the gtx29 series, not too much out there.. just saw the 2967 @garrett site. I guess the 2971 might be ok, the gt29 turbine comes with two wheel options, imo this turbo will be much better than any alpha30
 
  #33  
Old 04-25-2015, 09:50 AM
hydra.'s Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 14
hydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nicehydra. is just really nice
FWIW I still think that the sweet spot for a stock 3.6L motor is a gt28 (or equivalent, K16, EFR6258, TD05H, etc) sized turbine wheel with a suitably-matched billet comp wheel if response is an overriding concern..
 
  #34  
Old 04-25-2015, 09:58 AM
LQQK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 45
Posts: 456
Rep Power: 69
LQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond reputeLQQK has a reputation beyond repute
I looked into the gt29 and word is that it's a cut down gt30 wheel that was used on the small trim gt3071-wg that's be rebranded as a gt29
 
  #35  
Old 04-26-2015, 04:20 AM
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
Rep Power: 104
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 32krazy!
aren't you already at 600+ with tim setup? no need for 3076 to much lag and to big for these #'s. drop billet wheels into your k24 and your at the place you want for 1/3 the cost
In freezing cold the car does over 600 whp on E70 gas but recently with temps at 65-70F power is way down which is weird because last year in 85F it was doing implied 600 whp but I am at absolute max for the K24s.

I was thinking 3076 at even 1.3 bars would give an easy 600 whp on something like E30 gas
 
  #36  
Old 04-26-2015, 04:37 AM
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 991
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by wolfhedge
In freezing cold the car does over 600 whp on E70 gas but recently with temps at 65-70F power is way down which is weird because last year in 85F it was doing implied 600 whp but I am at absolute max for the K24s.

I was thinking 3076 at even 1.3 bars would give an easy 600 whp on something like E30 gas
After having 3 turbo setups on my car and looking for the 4th, I would say if you dont plan for 800whp than dont go with 3076, pick the smallest turbo that accomplishes your targets. My guess is a hybrid K24 will be the best way to go if you look price/performance and gt28 or efr62/6758 if not taking into consideration price for upgrade.

Expect 3076 to spool like 400+ rpms later than K24
 
  #37  
Old 04-26-2015, 05:55 AM
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
Rep Power: 104
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Fadi
After having 3 turbo setups on my car and looking for the 4th, I would say if you dont plan for 800whp than dont go with 3076, pick the smallest turbo that accomplishes your targets. My guess is a hybrid K24 will be the best way to go if you look price/performance and gt28 or efr62/6758 if not taking into consideration price for upgrade.

Expect 3076 to spool like 400+ rpms later than K24
I hear you but I am doing mods slowly as I get used to power levels and so my missus doesn't keep busting my *****.

My plan and you can help me with the thinking is this is that I can run larger turbos with great fueling at lower boost. My poor old K24s now on E85 hit 1.5 bars which is a wee bit much

so

1. A3076s
2. Run an E85 tune at about 1.3 bars

I am MAFLESS with excellent ETS Intercoolers rated up to about 1000 bhp

That will give me a car in the region 770-800 bhp ???? and 5.8s 60-103 mph

Mafless and E85 will help me spool much quicker than otherwise by about 500-550 rpms or so but as this is on a stock block I do not want A28 type spool as the few A28 cars I have been in have scared the bejesus outta me

The plan is to do rods and minor engine stuff next year and run higher power to do the Tx Mile
 

Last edited by wolfhedge; 04-26-2015 at 06:07 AM. Reason: extra typos
  #38  
Old 04-26-2015, 06:11 AM
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 991
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
@1.35bar 93octane timing I was able to get 6.0s 100-200hmh or like 6.5ish 60-130mph, I expect E85 to lower that by .2-.3s or so, I would guess you need at least 1.5bar to get 5.x 60-130.

I dont have a dyno of my A3076 setup, but now I run a bit bigger turbos gt30s based though, 1.3bar did 660whp, 1.65-1.7bar did 800whp or a bit more, this done with meth and racegas timing

I have never run E85, but spooling 500-550rpms earlier seems too much to be true..
If you plan for rods take A28 into consideration, otherwise A3076 are the best step to do

You have to run 1.5bar+ to wake up A3076, otherwise isnt worth it... on stock rods you can run 1.5bar for a while, maybe limit torque a bit or use 93octane timing on a E85 tune and I guess you can run for a long time
 
  #39  
Old 04-26-2015, 06:42 AM
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
Rep Power: 104
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
My MAFLESS and E85 runs 550 rpm quicker than the stock K24s, that is across about 100 measured runs but I am measuring from insta boost not peak boost so you may be correct but even MAFLESS made them spool quicker.

If I run E85 at lower boost will that give the added oomph on 3076s... I see that Spoolbus pushed 690 awhp on alpha 3076 with meth inj and 93 octane on 1.5 bars.. so I guess 1.3 bars on E85 will give mid 6xx whp
 
  #40  
Old 04-26-2015, 07:04 AM
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 991
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
I guess so... 650hp is what they should be good for at 1.3bar, also the above times of my car 100-200 and 60-130 were stock weight, 4wd,0% decline, no break boost, no flat shift, etc... So if you use all the tricks in the book maybe you will see a 5.x 60-130
 
  #41  
Old 04-26-2015, 09:05 AM
03EvoIII's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,266
Rep Power: 92
03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute03EvoIII has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by wolfhedge
My MAFLESS and E85 runs 550 rpm quicker than the stock K24s, that is across about 100 measured runs but I am measuring from insta boost not peak boost so you may be correct but even MAFLESS made them spool quicker.

If I run E85 at lower boost will that give the added oomph on 3076s... I see that Spoolbus pushed 690 awhp on alpha 3076 with meth inj and 93 octane on 1.5 bars.. so I guess 1.3 bars on E85 will give mid 6xx whp
This is good to hear! My 5431's are a tad smaller on the inducer side than the 3076r's and I'll also be on E85. I'm Hoping to be in the 6xx whp on 1.3-1.5 bar. What RPM were you seeing the K24s come on? I do not remember any discernible 'lag' with the smaller k16s at all.
 
  #42  
Old 04-26-2015, 07:15 PM
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
Rep Power: 104
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Fadi
I guess so... 650hp is what they should be good for at 1.3bar, also the above times of my car 100-200 and 60-130 were stock weight, 4wd,0% decline, no break boost, no flat shift, etc... So if you use all the tricks in the book maybe you will see a 5.x 60-130
TY that is what I was looking at
 
  #43  
Old 04-26-2015, 07:17 PM
wolfhedge's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
Rep Power: 104
wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !wolfhedge Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 03EvoIII
This is good to hear! My 5431's are a tad smaller on the inducer side than the 3076r's and I'll also be on E85. I'm Hoping to be in the 6xx whp on 1.3-1.5 bar. What RPM were you seeing the K24s come on? I do not remember any discernible 'lag' with the smaller k16s at all.
With the current E70 and 4th gear at WOT the boost at 4400 rpm is over 1bar... I will take a video and datalog when I get back to my house this week and check old E85 logs
 
  #44  
Old 04-28-2015, 03:49 AM
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 991
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
So final choices are the following
gtx2867
gtx2871
gtx2971

Let's take them one by one

1. gtx2867 - 48lbs capable compressor wheel, so should be good for 800whp on a 996tt, I would do the small A/R to have better spool as the compressor wheel shouldnt maximize the turbine
Anyway housing choices are:
Turbine Housing Options
PN A/R Type Divided Housing Inlet Outlet
430609-230 0.64 Wastegated N T25 5-Bolt
430609-231 0.86 Wastegated Y T25 5-Bolt
827690-1 0.57 Free Float N V-Band V Band
827690-2 0.72 Free Float N V-Band V Band

I guess the 0.72 V-Band is the way to go, giving both good spool and decent high end. I would say this should be the best turbo for a daily/street 996tt on stock displacement

2. gtx2871 - 56lbs wheel, for sure a bigger A/R is needed as the turbine wheel is huge, I would do it with smaller A/R first and if will still miss more power, might switch only turbine housing to a bigger one. Also TIAL housing is available ! Would do it with either 3.8L or 3.6+heads work to increase red line so they should provide enough power band.


3. gtx2971 - same 56lbs, bigger turbine wheel (old gt3071 turbine). Only for high boost lovers and guys looking for every HP. Guess will spool really fine with a 3.8+ liter and higher red line

I would exclude the gtx2971 as will have another car to be build with gtx3076, also I will eliminate the bigger A/R options, so will stick to 0.64 or 0.72 A/R with either wheel 67 or 71. I would match the bigger wheel to the bigger housing so the options would be

Gtx2867 A/R 0.64 or 0.72, externally gated - 480 hp rated
Gtx2871 A/R 0.64 or 0.72, externally gates - 560 hp rated

I guess the 2871 will loose 4-500rpms (combined form bigger comp wheel and bigger A/R) in spool and hit but should deliver 100hp more up on top and still being very enjoyable on the street and raceway at lower boost.

By the other hand I would have no problem to stay bellow 800hp on the 2867... problem is I can not estimate what the difference would be between the two options.

Any inputs you gt28 guys?
 
  #45  
Old 04-28-2015, 03:02 PM
orbelo's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glendale
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 38
orbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud oforbelo has much to be proud of
Tial Alpha28's 3.8L

Here is what I did with my Alpha 28's (GT2871) on both stock motor and built 3.8L. Car leaned out cause I was running out of fuel. 29+PSI Stock dyno is at 26 PSI, and a more aggressive dyno (Dyno Dynamics)
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Dyno Reduced.pdf (703.8 KB, 103 views)

Last edited by orbelo; 04-28-2015 at 03:07 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Gtx2867



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:53 PM.