Looking for feedback on light weight flywheel
Stay away from the semi solid transmission mounts. I've said it a million times. Can't tell you how many people have done it only to remove it and tell me "yeah, you were right". Full on race car where you wear ear plugs, yes, street car, hell no. Stock 997 mount is all you need. It's the same mount Porsche puts in the 997GT3RS 4.0 and the 997 GT2RS. Put in semi solid or solid engine mounts instead. That tightens up everything with hardly any added NVH. Nuff said...
Install - http://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-g...l#post13080709
NVH... - http://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-g...l#post13080789
Very interesting discussion on that bottom link about shifter cables! I currently have a DM 997 flywheel in my car, unsure of clutch disk. I will likely window weld my trans mount this summer and do semisolid engine mounts. If NVH from the trans mount is too high I'll buy the 997, I figure it's a free mod though I know several have said it's too loud. I have a decent stereo and would like to hear it! I've got numeric cables in a box too that I'm saving since just the shifter helped a great deal. I'd like to get the counterweight off the shift arm though!
It's not a free mod either. Window weld's what $15 or so, not bad. But buying a new mount is going to set you back some $200 or $300 I forget.
It's your car, however you want to do it. Just saying, be prepared for some nasty noise once the transaxle has fully warmed up.
Now why would anyone choose a lightweight flywheel on these cars.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?
I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.
On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!
If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?
I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.
On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!
If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
In fact here's an old video. The sound from inside the car was even louder, it over powers the mic on my phone and sounds quieter in the car but it was louder.
Transmission rattle from GT3RS flywheel - YouTube
Transmission rattle from GT3RS flywheel - YouTube
i can see why you wouldnt want that racket in any car though!
heres an idle video of mine with a carbonetics triple disk clutch and window weld trans mount with t/s motor mounts
View My Video
Now why would anyone choose a lightweight flywheel on these cars.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?
I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.
On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!
If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?
I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.
On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!
If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
since i was the one to recommend the window weld i wanted to clarify a bit. on my car i have NONE of that noise at idle. the window weld is a 74 durometer rating same as the 997 unit. im not sure of the lwfw has anything to do with it and i have a much larger clutch in mine as well. possible thats a factor? (erp triple c/f disk with steel f/w basket)
i can see why you wouldnt want that racket in any car though!
heres an idle video of mine with a carbonetics triple disk clutch and window weld trans mount with t/s motor mounts
View My Video
i can see why you wouldnt want that racket in any car though!
heres an idle video of mine with a carbonetics triple disk clutch and window weld trans mount with t/s motor mounts
View My Video
I know yours is also quiet when warmed up but just pointing out the cold start quiet for others.
Honestly I can't tell any different from my prior stock setup to the LWFW. In all fairness though I purchased the car and only got about 2 or 3 months seat time before I had to put a clutch in it. Maybe if I had the car longer prior it would be more pronounced but that makes me think the difference is fairly minor if you have to be super comfortable and used to the car to notice it.
Honestly I can't tell any different from my prior stock setup to the LWFW. In all fairness though I purchased the car and only got about 2 or 3 months seat time before I had to put a clutch in it. Maybe if I had the car longer prior it would be more pronounced but that makes me think the difference is fairly minor if you have to be super comfortable and used to the car to notice it.
The problem is the simple fact that many vendors are selling stuff without actually knowing what works and doesn't. I would never buy any "kit" without knowing what's in it. This is a prime example of it. If you run a solid disc with a LWFW, there will be nothing to absorb/dampen the pulses of the engine and they will be transferred directly to the gearbox = wear and tear and excessive noise. Also, from a drivability standpoint, not what you want. You wanna run the 4.0GT3 disc as that is the one that does the best job absorbing the vibration. It is also stronger and much quieter than the 996GT3RS disc that everyone used to run.
Also, check your 764 disc for any run out. I've seen a couple of brand new ones recently that had visible run out, a bad batch perhaps. Just spin it up to make sure it's true. You don't want to find out after install.
One thing I would add, when you do the GT2 conversion, instead of bolting the slave to the gearbox, drill and tap the case and install studs. Makes it much easier.
This is the LWFW conversion kit with the 764PP/4.0disc
996TT LWFW conversion kit | Explore pwdrhound1's photos on F… | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Also, check your 764 disc for any run out. I've seen a couple of brand new ones recently that had visible run out, a bad batch perhaps. Just spin it up to make sure it's true. You don't want to find out after install.
One thing I would add, when you do the GT2 conversion, instead of bolting the slave to the gearbox, drill and tap the case and install studs. Makes it much easier.
This is the LWFW conversion kit with the 764PP/4.0disc
996TT LWFW conversion kit | Explore pwdrhound1's photos on F… | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
The 4.0 disc only works with a lwfw. For dmfw use a solid hub GT2 disc
So I can use the Sachs GT2 clutch kit part#K70284-02 then correct and that will hold the power of a tuned X50 no problem?
I'm not familiar with that kit. What is the part number of each component that makes up the kit? What is the pressure plate used? Stay away from kits that do not give you that info.
I just ordered a new dual mass wheel because of this =)
Ask a reputable tuner who does not sell either types of flywheels and ask him whats the best.
We have a couple of really experienced guys here in norway and all of them told me to skip the lightweight flywheel.
A couple of years ago i was fiddeling with cosworths and those who bought lwfw for those cars regretted, on my car i added weights to increase weight from 9 to 11.5kgs.
I believe its just a hype for turboed engines to us lwfw.
Think when you rev your engine in neutral, you wont see any boost because there isnt any load, with a lightweigh flywheel you will have less load so it will take more time for the turbos too spool up.
With a heavier flywheel the engine must work more to push the pistons, therefore boost will build up sooner, and on turboed cars you want boost sooner.
On NA engines you wants revs sooner.
I really need help from the experts to explain this completely.
As mentioned i ended up with a dmfw on my car even if i could have a normal weight single mass fw made up for the same price.
There are just so many concerns with pulleys falling of, engine vibreations, drivetrain engagement and what not.
Consider lwfw only after talking to independent experts, thats my advice.



