996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Looking for feedback on light weight flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #136  
benw's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 110
From: OKC, OK
Rep Power: 38
benw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant futurebenw has a brilliant future
correct... besides the idle RPM there are a couple other tweaks to ensure the car doesn't die when idling down in neutral. Learned that the hard way.
 
Old Apr 13, 2016 | 04:18 PM
  #137  
stevemfr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 500
From: strasbourg, france
Rep Power: 83
stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
Stay away from the semi solid transmission mounts. I've said it a million times. Can't tell you how many people have done it only to remove it and tell me "yeah, you were right". Full on race car where you wear ear plugs, yes, street car, hell no. Stock 997 mount is all you need. It's the same mount Porsche puts in the 997GT3RS 4.0 and the 997 GT2RS. Put in semi solid or solid engine mounts instead. That tightens up everything with hardly any added NVH. Nuff said...
Same thing being echoed here in greater detail for those who don't want to take Pwdr's word for it:

Install - http://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-g...l#post13080709

NVH... - http://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-g...l#post13080789

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
But man, the stiffer mounts are loud as F*CK! My car with RS flywheel sounds exactly like a Cup car inside the cabin..
 
Old Apr 14, 2016 | 12:00 AM
  #138  
BLKMGK's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,949
From: Virginia
Rep Power: 575
BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !
Very interesting discussion on that bottom link about shifter cables! I currently have a DM 997 flywheel in my car, unsure of clutch disk. I will likely window weld my trans mount this summer and do semisolid engine mounts. If NVH from the trans mount is too high I'll buy the 997, I figure it's a free mod though I know several have said it's too loud. I have a decent stereo and would like to hear it! I've got numeric cables in a box too that I'm saving since just the shifter helped a great deal. I'd like to get the counterweight off the shift arm though!
 
Old Apr 14, 2016 | 07:14 AM
  #139  
MalcolmV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 269
From: Kansas City MO
Rep Power: 35
MalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by BLKMGK
I will likely window weld my trans mount this summer and do semisolid engine mounts. If NVH from the trans mount is too high I'll buy the 997, I figure it's a free mod though I know several have said it's too loud.
Did you see my video on the previous page? That's what happens when you window weld your trans mount. Let me tell you the video does the noise no justice. It's horrible. Sounds like a broken rat trap of a car that's embarrassing to drive.

It's not a free mod either. Window weld's what $15 or so, not bad. But buying a new mount is going to set you back some $200 or $300 I forget.

It's your car, however you want to do it. Just saying, be prepared for some nasty noise once the transaxle has fully warmed up.
 
Old Apr 14, 2016 | 03:38 PM
  #140  
BLKMGK's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,949
From: Virginia
Rep Power: 575
BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !BLKMGK Is a GOD !
Well my current mount is likely 14yo, somethings getting done either way! Is that a dmf or a lwfw? I'd expect that noise with a solid flywheel honestly.
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 04:39 AM
  #141  
Ronny-'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 215
From: Norway
Rep Power: 32
Ronny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud of
Now why would anyone choose a lightweight flywheel on these cars.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?

I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.

On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!

If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 05:43 AM
  #142  
32krazy!'s Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,551
From: tn
Rep Power: 628
32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MalcolmV8
In fact here's an old video. The sound from inside the car was even louder, it over powers the mic on my phone and sounds quieter in the car but it was louder.

Transmission rattle from GT3RS flywheel - YouTube
since i was the one to recommend the window weld i wanted to clarify a bit. on my car i have NONE of that noise at idle. the window weld is a 74 durometer rating same as the 997 unit. im not sure of the lwfw has anything to do with it and i have a much larger clutch in mine as well. possible thats a factor? (erp triple c/f disk with steel f/w basket)
i can see why you wouldnt want that racket in any car though!

heres an idle video of mine with a carbonetics triple disk clutch and window weld trans mount with t/s motor mounts
View My Video
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 09:00 AM
  #143  
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Ronny-
Now why would anyone choose a lightweight flywheel on these cars.
Did Porsche deliver any turbocars with a lightwheigt flywheel?

I know it revs up faster when you are in neutral, but with a turboed engines with fairly heavy components and huge mid rev torque you have no use for a lightened flywheel in my opinion.

On a GT3 maybe, on a turbo/gt2 absolutely no!

If you want a solid flywheel go for a heavy solid flywheel not these lightweight 3-4kg items.
Have you driven a 996TT with a LWFW? I think NOT...stop theorizing and go try one out...you won't look back.
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 09:42 AM
  #144  
MalcolmV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 269
From: Kansas City MO
Rep Power: 35
MalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud ofMalcolmV8 has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by 32krazy!
since i was the one to recommend the window weld i wanted to clarify a bit. on my car i have NONE of that noise at idle. the window weld is a 74 durometer rating same as the 997 unit. im not sure of the lwfw has anything to do with it and i have a much larger clutch in mine as well. possible thats a factor? (erp triple c/f disk with steel f/w basket)
i can see why you wouldnt want that racket in any car though!

heres an idle video of mine with a carbonetics triple disk clutch and window weld trans mount with t/s motor mounts
View My Video
My car is also quiet when first started up. I see you're on a lift in a shop there. In fact my idle chatter is completely quiet for the first few miles of driving even. It's only once the transaxles fully heats up and fluids are hot etc. Then idle has that nasty rattle sound.
I know yours is also quiet when warmed up but just pointing out the cold start quiet for others.

Originally Posted by wross996TT
Have you driven a 996TT with a LWFW? I think NOT...stop theorizing and go try one out...you won't look back.
Honestly I can't tell any different from my prior stock setup to the LWFW. In all fairness though I purchased the car and only got about 2 or 3 months seat time before I had to put a clutch in it. Maybe if I had the car longer prior it would be more pronounced but that makes me think the difference is fairly minor if you have to be super comfortable and used to the car to notice it.
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 10:08 AM
  #145  
wross996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 254
wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !wross996TT Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MalcolmV8
Honestly I can't tell any different from my prior stock setup to the LWFW. In all fairness though I purchased the car and only got about 2 or 3 months seat time before I had to put a clutch in it. Maybe if I had the car longer prior it would be more pronounced but that makes me think the difference is fairly minor if you have to be super comfortable and used to the car to notice it.
Realize, I have a slightly modified car...the stock system was unpredictable and likely would not be capable over time. I did most of the upgrades at about the same time. The LWFW is much more responsive...maybe its just me or my setup?
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 11:10 AM
  #146  
Fast Enough's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 55
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 15
Fast Enough is infamous around these partsFast Enough is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
The problem is the simple fact that many vendors are selling stuff without actually knowing what works and doesn't. I would never buy any "kit" without knowing what's in it. This is a prime example of it. If you run a solid disc with a LWFW, there will be nothing to absorb/dampen the pulses of the engine and they will be transferred directly to the gearbox = wear and tear and excessive noise. Also, from a drivability standpoint, not what you want. You wanna run the 4.0GT3 disc as that is the one that does the best job absorbing the vibration. It is also stronger and much quieter than the 996GT3RS disc that everyone used to run.

Also, check your 764 disc for any run out. I've seen a couple of brand new ones recently that had visible run out, a bad batch perhaps. Just spin it up to make sure it's true. You don't want to find out after install.

One thing I would add, when you do the GT2 conversion, instead of bolting the slave to the gearbox, drill and tap the case and install studs. Makes it much easier.

This is the LWFW conversion kit with the 764PP/4.0disc

996TT LWFW conversion kit | Explore pwdrhound1's photos on F… | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
pwdrhound, can you run this setup with a DMFW? And if so what kind of hardware changes need to happen?
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 11:21 AM
  #147  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Fast Enough
pwdrhound, can you run this setup with a DMFW? And if so what kind of hardware changes need to happen?
The 4.0 disc only works with a lwfw. For dmfw use a solid hub GT2 disc
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 11:49 AM
  #148  
Fast Enough's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 55
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 15
Fast Enough is infamous around these partsFast Enough is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
The 4.0 disc only works with a lwfw. For dmfw use a solid hub GT2 disc
So I can use the Sachs GT2 clutch kit part#K70284-02 then correct and that will hold the power of a tuned X50 no problem?
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 12:01 PM
  #149  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Fast Enough
So I can use the Sachs GT2 clutch kit part#K70284-02 then correct and that will hold the power of a tuned X50 no problem?
I'm not familiar with that kit. What is the part number of each component that makes up the kit? What is the pressure plate used? Stay away from kits that do not give you that info.
 
Old Apr 16, 2016 | 12:35 PM
  #150  
Ronny-'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 215
From: Norway
Rep Power: 32
Ronny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud ofRonny- has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by wross996TT
Have you driven a 996TT with a LWFW? I think NOT...stop theorizing and go try one out...you won't look back.
Well if the theory doesnt add up i dont want to spend my money on it.
I just ordered a new dual mass wheel because of this =)

Ask a reputable tuner who does not sell either types of flywheels and ask him whats the best.
We have a couple of really experienced guys here in norway and all of them told me to skip the lightweight flywheel.

A couple of years ago i was fiddeling with cosworths and those who bought lwfw for those cars regretted, on my car i added weights to increase weight from 9 to 11.5kgs.

I believe its just a hype for turboed engines to us lwfw.
Think when you rev your engine in neutral, you wont see any boost because there isnt any load, with a lightweigh flywheel you will have less load so it will take more time for the turbos too spool up.
With a heavier flywheel the engine must work more to push the pistons, therefore boost will build up sooner, and on turboed cars you want boost sooner.
On NA engines you wants revs sooner.

I really need help from the experts to explain this completely.

As mentioned i ended up with a dmfw on my car even if i could have a normal weight single mass fw made up for the same price.
There are just so many concerns with pulleys falling of, engine vibreations, drivetrain engagement and what not.

Consider lwfw only after talking to independent experts, thats my advice.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM.