Improved intercooler inlet duct project to lower IATs

that ain't gonna ( or will ) fly.. i wouldn't think?
Improved intercooler inlet duct project to lower IATs
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
... yes, did someone say "stick on" 
that ain't gonna ( or will ) fly.. i wouldn't think?

that ain't gonna ( or will ) fly.. i wouldn't think?
-V
not to disparage these pending efforts, I'm all for em and I don't know jack about 3m tape. but I was under the impression the mantheys used the existing inlet enclosures. seems weird for those of you potentially using them at 150+ to rely upon tape given their potentially extended exposure to draft?!. that was all that prompted my query.
I knew that was going to come as I was typing. 
No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.

No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.
I knew that was going to come as I was typing. 
No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.

No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.
I'm not challenging, 'cause I'm not knowledgeable enough to know better. But I'm aware that the pressure does go both ways along the speed curve. Like how they say to keep your house's windows open during a tornado. As for the rear window? I'm cabrio, so it ain't going anywhere.

For my part, I (sometimes wrongly) assume that developers handle all these performance-related things, so my observations, suggestions and preferences are based as much or more on aesthetics. I think a full collar insert would look a lot better than adding another seam to the intake surround.
-V
Hey guys,
Just got back for 3 days at the track testing some aero and I'm finally catching up and looking to follow up on the thread. First of all, thank for everyones input. I'm going to go back through the various posts and just answer each individually as that may be the easiest.
The more research I've done on this, the more I'm convinced that there will be a quantifiable improvement by using inlets that provide more of a scoop to get a ram air effect to the intercoolers. Yes, the outlets do create a low pressure area thus pulling air in over the ICs but if air can also be forced though the inlets than the result would be more air flowing over the cores. This is not a new concept, and as I've mentioned before, Porsche has employed a more aggressive inlet design on the later model cars. If you look at what various race teams have done with turbo Porsche cars, you will see that they always employ some type of ram air scoop to the intercoolers. A couple of examples done by Alzen and RS Tuning in Germany are below:
This the inlet on a Noble 400
Obviously these are no hold bared set up designed for performance over aesthetics. The application I had in mind would be a tamed down version basically along the lines of the GT4 scoops. The Manthey versions is not only expensive but not much improvement over the stockers in my opinion.
Finally, after emailing with Joe, he feels it would be great if he actually had a car on hand so that he could get a good in person visual of the lines of the car in conjunction with the inlets. He feels this would allow him to create the most aesthetically pleasing product. So, if anyone is in the Vancouver area and willing to help out, feel free to chime in.
Just got back for 3 days at the track testing some aero and I'm finally catching up and looking to follow up on the thread. First of all, thank for everyones input. I'm going to go back through the various posts and just answer each individually as that may be the easiest.
The more research I've done on this, the more I'm convinced that there will be a quantifiable improvement by using inlets that provide more of a scoop to get a ram air effect to the intercoolers. Yes, the outlets do create a low pressure area thus pulling air in over the ICs but if air can also be forced though the inlets than the result would be more air flowing over the cores. This is not a new concept, and as I've mentioned before, Porsche has employed a more aggressive inlet design on the later model cars. If you look at what various race teams have done with turbo Porsche cars, you will see that they always employ some type of ram air scoop to the intercoolers. A couple of examples done by Alzen and RS Tuning in Germany are below:
This the inlet on a Noble 400
Obviously these are no hold bared set up designed for performance over aesthetics. The application I had in mind would be a tamed down version basically along the lines of the GT4 scoops. The Manthey versions is not only expensive but not much improvement over the stockers in my opinion.
Finally, after emailing with Joe, he feels it would be great if he actually had a car on hand so that he could get a good in person visual of the lines of the car in conjunction with the inlets. He feels this would allow him to create the most aesthetically pleasing product. So, if anyone is in the Vancouver area and willing to help out, feel free to chime in.
Last edited by pwdrhound; Jul 20, 2015 at 12:45 PM.
The Manthey inlets are also attached with a high strength double sided adhesive tape to the existing inlets. This is also how the GT4 OEM inlets are attached. Personally, I would attach them with 3M tape which would act as a seal and also uses small screws or aluminum rivets from the backside of the OEM inlets for double security. This is how I've attached Joe's dive planes but other are only using tape with success. Obviously some people would not want to drill holes in the existing inlets and that is why the double sided adhesive could be used, whether tape of some type of contact cement.
i understand the concept and hope it works for everyone. heres my question. since theres all sorts of room under the i/c at the bottom back why not install a puller fan to draw air thru the i/c? fans are cheap its hidden out of the way and no worry about matching paint on the older car
( will joe have 996tt made in the piece?
)
( will joe have 996tt made in the piece?
)[url=https://flic.kr/p/vYHxu2]

[url=https://flic.kr/p/vYzfqE]
Getting more air to flow over any intercooler core will lower their respective IATs.
This might be, but as I was saying earlier, I seriously doubt you will be able to increase airflow at those speeds (highway = 50mph for you?)
This is the best example of what I am talking about: I have seen large 220V powered squirrel cage blowers with and w/o ducting directly to the IC inlet or outlet (blowing through backwards) that barely do the job for 1 run with a cool down period after. I just do not see a 12V fan that will help.
Another thing to consider is that a fan will add drag for any airflow at higher speeds.
Prove me wrong, but intuitively I'd dismiss this path before spending any time on it.
This is the best example of what I am talking about: I have seen large 220V powered squirrel cage blowers with and w/o ducting directly to the IC inlet or outlet (blowing through backwards) that barely do the job for 1 run with a cool down period after. I just do not see a 12V fan that will help.
Another thing to consider is that a fan will add drag for any airflow at higher speeds.
Prove me wrong, but intuitively I'd dismiss this path before spending any time on it.





