996 Turbo Vendor Classifieds

Improved intercooler inlet duct project to lower IATs

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 06:22 AM
  #31  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by SaintGT2
I'd be interested but not with an add on rather the same as Manthey had previously.
... yes, did someone say "stick on"

that ain't gonna ( or will ) fly.. i wouldn't think?
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 08:37 AM
  #32  
z06801's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 830
From: NSL
Rep Power: 70
z06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond repute
Improved intercooler inlet duct project to lower IATs

Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
... yes, did someone say "stick on"

that ain't gonna ( or will ) fly.. i wouldn't think?
I'm interested too, that 3m tape can be really strong if applied right. Maybe the lip could lock underneath, but I bet it would hold.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 09:21 AM
  #33  
stevemfr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 500
From: strasbourg, france
Rep Power: 83
stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !
Your windshields are all 'stuck on' - and that is some serious surface area.

As powder mentioned, the dive planes are 'stuck on' too.
Not an issue if done right.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 09:48 AM
  #34  
Vendetta's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 110
Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by stevemfr
Your windshields are all 'stuck on' - and that is some serious surface area.

As powder mentioned, the dive planes are 'stuck on' too.
Not an issue if done right.
The windshield is getting pressed tighter at speed, not sheared off. I wouldn't cup my hand and stick it out the window at 170mph. But even putting that aside, what is the downside to making these as the full inserts - besides cost probably.

-V
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 10:09 AM
  #35  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Vendetta
The windshield is getting pressed tighter at speed, not sheared off. I wouldn't cup my hand and stick it out the window at 170mph. But even putting that aside, what is the downside to making these as the full inserts - besides cost probably.

-V

not to disparage these pending efforts, I'm all for em and I don't know jack about 3m tape. but I was under the impression the mantheys used the existing inlet enclosures. seems weird for those of you potentially using them at 150+ to rely upon tape given their potentially extended exposure to draft?!. that was all that prompted my query.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 10:15 AM
  #36  
johnny.dangerous's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 679
From: UK
Rep Power: 53
johnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud ofjohnny.dangerous has much to be proud of
IMO if they stayed on with tape at over 100mph it would show they did not work as they will need to 'grab' air and pull it into the intake.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 10:35 AM
  #37  
stevemfr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 500
From: strasbourg, france
Rep Power: 83
stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Vendetta
The windshield is getting pressed tighter at speed, not sheared off.
I knew that was going to come as I was typing.
No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 11:49 AM
  #38  
Vendetta's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
From: Long Island, NY
Rep Power: 110
Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !Vendetta Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by stevemfr
I knew that was going to come as I was typing.
No, actually at speed there can be large outward forces on the windshield, too. But, skip it. Take the rear window. Or the fact that large portions of modern cars are no longer welded but glued (chassis components!).
Whatever.
I'm not challenging, 'cause I'm not knowledgeable enough to know better. But I'm aware that the pressure does go both ways along the speed curve. Like how they say to keep your house's windows open during a tornado.

As for the rear window? I'm cabrio, so it ain't going anywhere.

For my part, I (sometimes wrongly) assume that developers handle all these performance-related things, so my observations, suggestions and preferences are based as much or more on aesthetics. I think a full collar insert would look a lot better than adding another seam to the intake surround.

-V
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 11:56 AM
  #39  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Hey guys,
Just got back for 3 days at the track testing some aero and I'm finally catching up and looking to follow up on the thread. First of all, thank for everyones input. I'm going to go back through the various posts and just answer each individually as that may be the easiest.

The more research I've done on this, the more I'm convinced that there will be a quantifiable improvement by using inlets that provide more of a scoop to get a ram air effect to the intercoolers. Yes, the outlets do create a low pressure area thus pulling air in over the ICs but if air can also be forced though the inlets than the result would be more air flowing over the cores. This is not a new concept, and as I've mentioned before, Porsche has employed a more aggressive inlet design on the later model cars. If you look at what various race teams have done with turbo Porsche cars, you will see that they always employ some type of ram air scoop to the intercoolers. A couple of examples done by Alzen and RS Tuning in Germany are below:




This the inlet on a Noble 400



Obviously these are no hold bared set up designed for performance over aesthetics. The application I had in mind would be a tamed down version basically along the lines of the GT4 scoops. The Manthey versions is not only expensive but not much improvement over the stockers in my opinion.

Finally, after emailing with Joe, he feels it would be great if he actually had a car on hand so that he could get a good in person visual of the lines of the car in conjunction with the inlets. He feels this would allow him to create the most aesthetically pleasing product. So, if anyone is in the Vancouver area and willing to help out, feel free to chime in.
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; Jul 20, 2015 at 12:45 PM.
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:13 PM
  #40  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by johnny.dangerous
Im interested in these as long as the data stacks up but as for attaching with tape!!! I cannot see that happening on a car capable of hitting 200mph, I think they will need to be permanently attached to the stock vents.
The Manthey inlets are also attached with a high strength double sided adhesive tape to the existing inlets. This is also how the GT4 OEM inlets are attached. Personally, I would attach them with 3M tape which would act as a seal and also uses small screws or aluminum rivets from the backside of the OEM inlets for double security. This is how I've attached Joe's dive planes but other are only using tape with success. Obviously some people would not want to drill holes in the existing inlets and that is why the double sided adhesive could be used, whether tape of some type of contact cement.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:13 PM
  #41  
z06801's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 830
From: NSL
Rep Power: 70
z06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond reputez06801 has a reputation beyond repute
Improved intercooler inlet duct project to lower IATs

I think that they will work and will give GT3 owners scoop envy
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #42  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 32krazy!
i understand the concept and hope it works for everyone. heres my question. since theres all sorts of room under the i/c at the bottom back why not install a puller fan to draw air thru the i/c? fans are cheap its hidden out of the way and no worry about matching paint on the older car

( will joe have 996tt made in the piece? )
Steve, there is no way a fan will provide as much airflow at speed as ram air would. Then there is the added weight, complexity, etc, etc...
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:21 PM
  #43  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by su_maverick
Maybe Im missing something but wouldnt it be better to just redo the entire IC intake to be a widemouth opening? Of course, it might just be because I havent completely woken up yet...
To completely remake the inlets with OEM clips and such would be cost prohibitive on an item such as this. These are the OEM ones:

[url=https://flic.kr/p/vYHxu2]

[url=https://flic.kr/p/vYzfqE]
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:30 PM
  #44  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Aktavate
Interested to see what these end up looking like and if there would be an appreciable difference on stock ICs.
Getting more air to flow over any intercooler core will lower their respective IATs.
 
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 12:32 PM
  #45  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by stevemfr
This might be, but as I was saying earlier, I seriously doubt you will be able to increase airflow at those speeds (highway = 50mph for you?)


This is the best example of what I am talking about: I have seen large 220V powered squirrel cage blowers with and w/o ducting directly to the IC inlet or outlet (blowing through backwards) that barely do the job for 1 run with a cool down period after. I just do not see a 12V fan that will help.

Another thing to consider is that a fan will add drag for any airflow at higher speeds.

Prove me wrong, but intuitively I'd dismiss this path before spending any time on it.
Totally agree Steve.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 PM.