HP vs 60-130
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
subscribed also
C'mon Ed I'm still waiting for some 60-130 numbers on your beast - or at least some 100-200km/h numbers, lol.
Also eagerly awaiting the times for those 68mm Champion vtg kits.
C'mon Ed I'm still waiting for some 60-130 numbers on your beast - or at least some 100-200km/h numbers, lol.
Also eagerly awaiting the times for those 68mm Champion vtg kits.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
From: Texas
Rep Power: 342
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
Before you can compare different whp ratings, what do you consider to be a baseline WHP for a stock car, because (as you know) we've seen numbers varying based on dyno and other factors.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
I suspect there's going to be a range but it would interesting to hear what people think. That said, if you know what baseline whp for stocker, maybe that can be used to somewhat calibrate opinions. What's the general consensus, 380-400 whp?
Last edited by TTdude; Mar 19, 2011 at 02:57 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 339
From: CT
Rep Power: 43
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,957
From: Texas
Rep Power: 456
Ok Dave!
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,191
From: Texas
Rep Power: 342
Think those are pretty good assumptions.
Ok Dave!
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
Ok Dave!
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
PS So your perky little A28s are putting out 725-750 whp. Nice!!
Last edited by TTdude; Mar 19, 2011 at 04:00 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,021
From: Italy
Rep Power: 86
Yes, verified, it's here:
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...mile-list.html
A little birdie told me that Mike (ttboost) has VERY good driving skills though.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...mile-list.html
A little birdie told me that Mike (ttboost) has VERY good driving skills though.
Last edited by emadelta86; Mar 19, 2011 at 04:15 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
Ok Dave!
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
I will play...
This is an old post from Gene (Eclou) on the 60-130 thread. I believe the faster times probably have too much power associated with them but I think the slower times are pretty accurate for full weight 996/997TTs...
Does it seem reasonable that whp vs times look roughly like this:
whp 60-130 s
400 10
450 9
500 8
550 7.5
600 7
650 6.5
700 6
750 5.5
800 5
900 4.5
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post1785653
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
Gene's car ran with 50/50 Race/Pump fuel a dedicated 60-130 in 7.6s. I'm going to guess he was putting down somewhere around 500-550 whp based on AWE's Mustang AWD dyno:
Last edited by bbywu; Mar 19, 2011 at 04:52 PM.