Tuning/Modifications

KA - In Memory of my Mom (Vincee) and best friend Michael J. Maring

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 90 votes, 4.16 average.
 
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #2266  
VRAlexander
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by cjv
That would be 2000-2200 hp. Would the case/block/cylinders hold up for very long?
Since this is a Race-Prep block (designed and built for a twin-turbo application)...I don't know??????? I think that as long as I don't run 3bar all the time...it should hold up fairly well...there is one way to find out ...
 
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 11:47 PM
  #2267  
Chasen1211's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
From: Belmont, CA
Rep Power: 71
Chasen1211 is a jewel in the roughChasen1211 is a jewel in the roughChasen1211 is a jewel in the rough
2200 is quite a bit of ponies, if you ask me...:P
 
Old Dec 1, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #2268  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Chasen1211
2200 is quite a bit of ponies, if you ask me...:P
Chasen,

No doubt ............. alot of ponies for a brief moment. High boost creates heat in the charged air. Heat robs power rather quickly. In a straight line run for a brief moment you would be fine, on a track or held over an extended period you would lose over half of your power to heat. The trick is to make as much power as you can at a lower boost ............ say .8-1.0 bar ideally or 1.0 -1.2 bar at the most. This is what really drives up the costs of a good motor (more power at lower boost.)

Just my two cents.
 

Last edited by cjv; Dec 3, 2006 at 10:49 PM.
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #2269  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
As an update, we will have some real intersting pics just prior to Christmas.
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #2270  
PerfPow's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 63
From: Libertyville, IL
Rep Power: 25
PerfPow is infamous around these parts
Nice topic!
I'll bet that the 2.0 Bar they're referring to is absolute. With 2.0 bar of boost on top the 8.62:1 c/r and the V10's already large displacement, 1200lb/ft would be possible, realistically and reliably. With those big GT-45s holding almost all the boost, close to 11000 rpm, maintaining nearly 1000lb/ft would be adequate to yield 2000 hp.

Nice! (said like Borat)

As for the ability to use it, anyone who has operated high horsepower cars, motorcycles, boats or airplanes, knows that there are some conditions where even a real hero can't apply full power. However, there are those high speeds, where another 300 or 400 horsepower can come in very handy!
Finally, as for reliability of these super high-powered engines, they sort of take care of themselves, since, other than Bonnevile or Muroc, there aren't many place where the throttle will be held wide open for sustained periods of time. How long does a winning 7000 hp dragster engine last? 5 seconds, or something before catastrophic failure or complete rebuild.

Sol
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #2271  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
I'll tell you nothing is easy. I wanted to go with the Dysan Carbon Fiber wheels with center hubs. They can do it in center hubs, however not half sizes so we can't get 10.5's. In addition. we would like 12.5's but again no half sizes. Currently the largest size they make is 11's, no 12's but they are saying 13's night be available aometime around March of 2007.

Nothing is easy with this project.
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #2272  
KhanNSX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 519
From: Minneapolis, MN
Rep Power: 54
KhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud of
I'm guessing you already know of them, but have you tried?:

http://www.rennworx.com/

Saw them at SEMA and they were very nice. But other then that, I have no experience with them.
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 09:33 PM
  #2273  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by KhanNSX
I'm guessing you already know of them, but have you tried?:

http://www.rennworx.com/

Saw them at SEMA and they were very nice. But other then that, I have no experience with them.
They are the distributor for the US. They are the ones who supplied the information.
 
Old Dec 4, 2006 | 09:55 PM
  #2274  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Anyone have any ideas what the following tire choices would do to the handling?

Fronts - Michelin PSC's 305/30-19's. They have a 26.2" outside diameter and 791 rotations per mile.

Rears - Michelin PSC's 345/30-18's. They have a 26.3" outside diameter and 790 rotations per mile.

The OD and rotations are made in heaven. What will be the effect of 19's in the front?
 
Old Dec 5, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #2275  
justdumb's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 383
From: United States
Rep Power: 36
justdumb is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by cjv
The OD and rotations are made in heaven. What will be the effect of 19's in the front?
I've done some quick calculations and have come to the conclusion that it will look goofy!
 
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #2276  
VRAlexander
Guest
Posts: n/a
From a performance standpoint, giving the wheelbase of the 996tt, I think that you should stay with a 18inch rim....also, why so wide????? that will just slow you down...
 

Last edited by cjv; Dec 6, 2006 at 04:35 PM.
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 04:39 PM
  #2277  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by VRAlexander
From a performance standpoint, giving the wheelbase of the 996tt, I think that you should stay with a 18inch rim....also, why so wide????? that will just slow you down...
VR, we are having a real suspenion geru look at this right now. As far as set up, we are not looking for top end speed. My two favorite local tracks are Infineron and LS. In addition I love roads like Mt. Hamilton, Highway One etc. I want this car to hug the twisties.

We don't want a wide body for the looks, we want it for the handling performance, if in fact it can improve this area.

If you look at our engine build, you will see it is a compromise between power and quickness with the edge going to quickness (Less weight many times reaches a limitation point power wise.) As in quickness coming out of an apex. Everything from the clutch, flywheel, crank, journals, rods, wrist pins and pistons were designed to eliminate rotating weight. The idea being less rotating weight allows the motor to accelerate faster into it's maximum torque rpm range. This is what pulls you out of the turns. This is not for a very long period of time, therefore you need to make the of this time through the engine response.
 
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #2278  
Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,321
From: Earth
Rep Power: 210
Phoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant futurePhoenix has a brilliant future
Chad,

Will S Car Go be doing the fabrication/installation/painting, etc. of the wide body or will it be somone else?
 
Old Dec 6, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #2279  
VRAlexander
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by cjv
VR, we are having a real suspenion geru look at this right now. As far as set up, we are not looking for top end speed. My two favorite local tracks are Infineron and LS. In addition I love roads like Mt. Hamilton, Highway One etc. I want this car to hug the twisties.

We don't want a wide body for the looks, we want it for the handling performance, if in fact it can improve this area.

If you look at our engine build, you will see it is a compromise between power and quickness with the edge going to quickness (Less weight many times reaches a limitation point power wise.) As in quickness coming out of an apex. Everything from the clutch, flywheel, crank, journals, rods, wrist pins and pistons were designed to eliminate rotating weight. The idea being less rotating weight allows the motor to accelerate faster into it's maximum torque rpm range. This is what pulls you out of the turns. This is not for a very long period of time, therefore you need to make the of this time through the engine response.
Great game plan....just keep in mind the c/d factors as to contact patch as well as wind resistance! Looking forward to the day of breaking into new record territory with her ....had a nice long chat with Todd today about your final engine set-up.....talk about a new envelope !!!
 
Old Dec 9, 2006 | 10:42 PM
  #2280  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Our fuel requirement have just been determined for this motor. It is 900 pounds per hour which translates with overboost into 174 pound injectors. The pumps and injectors are being built and we should have them by January 15th.
 

Last edited by cjv; Dec 9, 2006 at 11:53 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 90 votes, 4.16 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.