60-130 in 4.74 seconds
#1
04-13-2008, 12:40 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787 
60-130 in 4.74 seconds
2-shifts going ever so slightly uphill (0.02% incline).
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-13-2008 at 12:55 PM.
#2
04-13-2008, 12:48 PM
Basic Sponsor
That's more like it Scott... BIG CONGRATS.....
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#3
04-13-2008, 12:50 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787
This run was with my Boost Controller turned off. Only .8 BAR (the lowest amount of power I can make with my car). I get 7.09 with 2-shifts.
For comparison, my best run in my stock Z6 Z06 is 7.99, which is .6 seconds faster than any other run from a stock C6 Z06 that I'm aware of.
This run was also sent to KPG for verfication.
For comparison, my best run in my stock Z6 Z06 is 7.99, which is .6 seconds faster than any other run from a stock C6 Z06 that I'm aware of.
This run was also sent to KPG for verfication.
#4
04-13-2008, 12:51 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787 Thanks, Mark! I really appreciate it, bro. The car is running phenomenally well!
#5
04-13-2008, 12:56 PM
Basic Sponsor
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#7
04-13-2008, 01:02 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787
Well...not quite. I've lost around 42 lbs since my 4.90 run due to the installation of GT3 seats (-60 lbs), and swapping a Optima red top battery for the little 14 lb Odyssey PC680 I used to have (+18 lbs).
Trending Topics
#8
04-13-2008, 01:03 PM
Basic Sponsor
haha ur searching again... LOL
you need $85K on the build out... and u need C16...
you need $85K on the build out... and u need C16...
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
#9
04-13-2008, 01:03 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787
Built motor, GT35Rs, RWD conversion.
I already gave you a link to the thread that covers my entire build process....but here it is again:https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ad.php?t=74560
And before you ask, on pump gas my car is significantly faster than a stock C6 Z06.
I already gave you a link to the thread that covers my entire build process....but here it is again:https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ad.php?t=74560
And before you ask, on pump gas my car is significantly faster than a stock C6 Z06.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; 04-13-2008 at 01:13 PM.
#11
04-13-2008, 01:13 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne Beach, Fl
Age: 61
Posts: 1,477
Rep Power: 115 2-shifts going ever so slightly uphill (0.02% incline).
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
#13
04-13-2008, 01:15 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787 
#14
04-13-2008, 01:15 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 8,511
Rep Power: 787
Thank you, Craig. I really appreciate the kind comments.
#15
04-13-2008, 01:22 PM
2-shifts going ever so slightly uphill (0.02% incline).
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
Great humidity, low temps...but low atmospheric pressure (bad). We're at a density altitiude of 412' today. I'm confident I can beat this time on a better day.
Raw data sent to KPG for independent verification. Time will not be posted as an official run until verified by KPG.
Congrats on the new time!