997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

3.8L Build Started

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 03:24 PM
  #106  
Chkmgnt59's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 357
From: DFW
Rep Power: 40
Chkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud of
Just for kicks - 67mm vtgs and e85 plotted out. The alphas seem to have slightly better spool than the 67VTGs, interesting. I shouldn't have used 2nd gear for spool, look how crazy boost/load get then smooth out in 3/4 gears. Todd's still tweaking this map but close to final.

2nd gear spool up:


3rd gear continuation:


And 4th Gear:
 
Attached Images     

Last edited by Chkmgnt59; Aug 13, 2013 at 03:30 PM.
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 03:29 PM
  #107  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Nice data Chk -- thanks for sharing. Boost holds up throughout the range. That's awesome. Car must feel really good.
 
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 03:33 PM
  #108  
Chkmgnt59's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 357
From: DFW
Rep Power: 40
Chkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud ofChkmgnt59 has much to be proud of
Yeah its very smooth feeling on acceleration. The tq dropping off up in the RPM range on the VTGs is where the alphas you've got are going to fly. You won't see the load/tq dropping like that, and thus just zoom zoom :-)
 
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 10:47 PM
  #109  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
Coooool graphs! If you get a chance Dave please overlay the load graph of your old modded vtgs with the alpha graph. It may bring me to tears, but it would definitely be interesting.

I must say that the power bandwidth of the modded vtgs is amazing to me, I wouldn't give it up for more power higher up the rpms. I'm just curious about the 3-4k rpm response for the alphas.
 
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 12:13 PM
  #110  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by The Bogg
Coooool graphs! If you get a chance Dave please overlay the load graph of your old modded vtgs with the alpha graph. It may bring me to tears, but it would definitely be interesting.

I must say that the power bandwidth of the modded vtgs is amazing to me, I wouldn't give it up for more power higher up the rpms. I'm just curious about the 3-4k rpm response for the alphas.
Here you go Asher.

 
Attached Images  
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 12:48 PM
  #111  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
If I understand this correctly, the alphas spool earlier than modded vtgs, is that right??? I realize your boost is "only" at 1.3 but even then I thought the alphas would have way more hp/tq (and load) than the vtgs, no?
 
Old Aug 15, 2013 | 11:14 PM
  #112  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by The Bogg
If I understand this correctly, the alphas spool earlier than modded vtgs, is that right??? I realize your boost is "only" at 1.3 but even then I thought the alphas would have way more hp/tq (and load) than the vtgs, no?
That does appear to be the case, at least for my situation. I'll test at 1.5 bar and see where things land. As Chk pointed out, this is maf vs map comparo. Are you running mafless? If so can you check to see if your values are the same with maf?
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 01:01 AM
  #113  
0-60motorsport's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 149
From: Kingdom of Bahrain
Rep Power: 26
0-60motorsport is infamous around these parts
Awesome build. Protomotive do some great work.
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 06:41 AM
  #114  
The Bogg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 236
The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !The Bogg Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
That does appear to be the case, at least for my situation. I'll test at 1.5 bar and see where things land. As Chk pointed out, this is maf vs map comparo. Are you running mafless? If so can you check to see if your values are the same with maf?
I'm currently running mafless but when I sent you the datalog file I think I was using the maf. I'll log both ways and report back.
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:17 AM
  #115  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by The Bogg
I'm currently running mafless but when I sent you the datalog file I think I was using the maf. I'll log both ways and report back.
That would be great. Thanks Asher.
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:35 AM
  #116  
cannga's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,116
From: Palos Verdes
Rep Power: 256
cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by The Bogg
If I understand this correctly, the alphas spool earlier than modded vtgs, is that right??? I realize your boost is "only" at 1.3 but even then I thought the alphas would have way more hp/tq (and load) than the vtgs, no?
Question please: Is this observation of "earlier spool" based on generally accepted observations of VTG vs. Alpha, or is it based on the dyno-type curves that Dave posted?

I don't believe you could tell turbo spooling speed from Dave's dyno curves, no? These curves may appear to indicate speed of spooling, but I don't think so as there is no time element in either axis.

Spooling speed comparison I think would require a graph of RPM vs. Time on x axis, not these dyno curves, and would require that WOT to be applied at exact same RPM.
 

Last edited by cannga; Aug 16, 2013 at 09:41 AM.
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 09:58 AM
  #117  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cannga
Question please: Is this based on general accepted observation of VTG vs. Alpha, or is it based on the dyno-type curves that Dave posted?

I don't believe you could tell turbo spooling speed from the curves, no? That would require a graph of RPM vs. Time on x axis, not these dyno curves.
Based on these curves, boost is clearly being generated earlier than VTGs. But once the VTGs kick in, the slope is steeper due to physical design attributes between the two different turbos.
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 10:49 AM
  #118  
cannga's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,116
From: Palos Verdes
Rep Power: 256
cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !cannga Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
Here you go Asher.


Dave, what I meant is, yes the curves show that A3076 boost starts at 2500 rpm, and VTG at 3200 rpm, but to answer whether "spool up" is faster in one or the other, you need to know the time elapse between WOT and peak boost. And *time* element is not graphed in these curves, it tells you boost vs. RPM, not boost vs. time.

In other words, in Durametric data, we need to look at time that WOT starts, use this as 0 on x axis (time axis), and graph against boost on y axis (boost axis). I've actually looked at my data already, to compare spool of GIAC vs. stock, but was just too lazy to graph that yet.

Also, another question for the graph, unrelated to above: in the 2 runs of Alpha vs. VTG, did WOT start at identical engine speed (2000 rpm or whatever) in each run? The Alpha seems to rise so much earlier, could it be that you apply throttle at a lower rpm? Your comparison seems to show exact opposite of what's expected of VTG, earlier RPM rise, no?
Thanks for sharing the data; I am learning a lot.
 

Last edited by cannga; Aug 16, 2013 at 11:02 AM.
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 11:13 AM
  #119  
TTdude's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Can, These are good points and questions. I believe these are WOT data but will check starting point, etc...when I have some time and get back to you. Dave
 
Old Aug 16, 2013 | 04:19 PM
  #120  
997TTMeister's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 147
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 20
997TTMeister is infamous around these parts
Observation and question. Leaving 'Load' component aside, the obvious difference in the comparison chart, appears to be the boost threshold speed(rpm). The alphas speed is much lower, but the VTGs time from boost threshold speed to maximum boost is faster. Is it the VTG variable design that causes this late boost? If the ECU controls boost via the vanes, can't it be programed to boost earlier?

Thoughts?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.