TPC's DSC quick review...
Awesome writeup! Rep points of course. I will definitely get one of these, just waiting till our peso rebounds a little since I'm in no rush with the car being in hibernation. In fact, I'll pick it up when I'm on vacation in Florida.
Harris, are these a stocked item or is there a lead time?
Harris, are these a stocked item or is there a lead time?
If anyone is at Sebring for the PCA event, be sure to stop by and say hello. Our DSC Sport engineers will be on site as we are testing our 997 GT3 Cup car with Tractive DDA shocks controlled by DSC!
997 gt2
Just to add balance not all good reviews. This fellow had a shocking experience.
http://rennlist.com/forums/997-turbo...pinions-2.html
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member
TB993tt's Avatar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,870
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgfen View Post
Thanks for taking the time to post this.
Would still like to hear from others who have done this mod their perceptions of the performance as compared with stock pasm.
Thanks
Craig
I tried 4 DSM units on my Bilstein Damptronic GT2, first unit was rock hard all time, second unit triggered PASM warning light third and forth just didn't seem to work right, the ride was always harder than stock and I couldn't detect any better handling than standard.
All units went back and I have lost confidence in the product mainly because it is so hard to quantify an "improvement" over the factory unit and I guess I am thinking how much development time went into the GT2 settings by the Motorsport dept of Porsche/Bilstein and how equipped in terms of resources are TPC to do better.
__________________
997GT2 RS Tuning 2014 built 3.9 litre K24
993tt RS Tuning 2006 street 3.8 MAF
Rennlist User#38
http://rennlist.com/forums/997-turbo...pinions-2.html
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member
TB993tt's Avatar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,870
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgfen View Post
Thanks for taking the time to post this.
Would still like to hear from others who have done this mod their perceptions of the performance as compared with stock pasm.
Thanks
Craig
I tried 4 DSM units on my Bilstein Damptronic GT2, first unit was rock hard all time, second unit triggered PASM warning light third and forth just didn't seem to work right, the ride was always harder than stock and I couldn't detect any better handling than standard.
All units went back and I have lost confidence in the product mainly because it is so hard to quantify an "improvement" over the factory unit and I guess I am thinking how much development time went into the GT2 settings by the Motorsport dept of Porsche/Bilstein and how equipped in terms of resources are TPC to do better.
__________________
997GT2 RS Tuning 2014 built 3.9 litre K24
993tt RS Tuning 2006 street 3.8 MAF
Rennlist User#38
^ interesting review by TB993tt. This is totally contrary to my experience with the DSC module. I have no reason to doubt his experience but "stiffer all the time" run counter to what most have experienced (including Randy Pobst). Could there have been something unique to his built car's suspension? Maybe Harris from TPC can chime in, afterall I have to imagine they must have been in contact with him if he exchanged the DSC module three times!! Thank for sharing IMI A
To quote TB993t (the guy that was sent 4 units)
"Personally I would like to see some sort of comparative data of a eg 997 turbo lapping a circuit with and without DSC. I'd like to see position on the track speed lateral acceleration longitudinal acceleration which dampers are being stiffened and the speed of the stiffening and by what degree and finally that the lap time is faster with the DSC."
I completely agree. For the money thats being asked i.e. $1,190.00 not unreasonable to see some comparable data. Perhaps TPC can arrange for an independent test to be carried out as if it works will sell even more units. Quality issue are of concern to me though. I'd be very annoyed in that guys shoes installing and uninstalling units 4 times even if it is just a 15 min job.
"Personally I would like to see some sort of comparative data of a eg 997 turbo lapping a circuit with and without DSC. I'd like to see position on the track speed lateral acceleration longitudinal acceleration which dampers are being stiffened and the speed of the stiffening and by what degree and finally that the lap time is faster with the DSC."
I completely agree. For the money thats being asked i.e. $1,190.00 not unreasonable to see some comparable data. Perhaps TPC can arrange for an independent test to be carried out as if it works will sell even more units. Quality issue are of concern to me though. I'd be very annoyed in that guys shoes installing and uninstalling units 4 times even if it is just a 15 min job.
To quote TB993t (the guy that was sent 4 units)
"Personally I would like to see some sort of comparative data of a eg 997 turbo lapping a circuit with and without DSC. I'd like to see position on the track speed lateral acceleration longitudinal acceleration which dampers are being stiffened and the speed of the stiffening and by what degree and finally that the lap time is faster with the DSC."
I completely agree. For the money thats being asked i.e. $1,190.00 not unreasonable to see some comparable data. Perhaps TPC can arrange for an independent test to be carried out as if it works will sell even more units. Quality issue are of concern to me though. I'd be very annoyed in that guys shoes installing and uninstalling units 4 times even if it is just a 15 min job.
"Personally I would like to see some sort of comparative data of a eg 997 turbo lapping a circuit with and without DSC. I'd like to see position on the track speed lateral acceleration longitudinal acceleration which dampers are being stiffened and the speed of the stiffening and by what degree and finally that the lap time is faster with the DSC."
I completely agree. For the money thats being asked i.e. $1,190.00 not unreasonable to see some comparable data. Perhaps TPC can arrange for an independent test to be carried out as if it works will sell even more units. Quality issue are of concern to me though. I'd be very annoyed in that guys shoes installing and uninstalling units 4 times even if it is just a 15 min job.
I'm also not sure that being quicker is the purpose of the module but I'm sure TPC can tell us. In the soft mode on OEM car I find it too soft for certain roads especially for fast road work here in the UK where roads are terrible. This is exaggerated even more as my 997 turbo basically has GT2 RS engine set up so everything can lose composure even more quickly on a technical piece of road. On track I found the OEM sport setting absolutely fine but on road its far too hard for our roads here in the UK. A set up with an in-between setting is what I think TPC are maybe trying to give us and on road yes that set up will be ultimately faster because the cars mass is therefor (in theory) more controlled. On track on ultimate hard settings I actually doubt there's anything in it between OEM and TPC module all things being equal but happy to be proved wrong
i.e a track test as you're outlining.The quality control issues are more of a concern. To be honest none of you guys really know if the module is even working properly.
Last edited by IMI A; Feb 8, 2015 at 04:02 AM.
I understand what you mean but you know even if it is was 1-2mph quicker through a corner thats a massive difference. It will never be 5-10mph quicker. Thats the difference between a small hatch back and a McLaren lol.
I'm also not sure that being quicker is the purpose of the module but I'm sure TPC can tell us. In the soft mode on OEM car I find it too soft for certain roads especially for fast road work here in the UK where roads are terrible. This is exaggerated even more as my 997 turbo basically has GT2 RS engine set up so everything can lose composure even more quickly on a technical piece of road. On track I found the OEM sport setting absolutely fine but on road its far too hard for our roads here in the UK. A set up with an in-between setting is what I think TPC are maybe trying to give us and on road yes that set up will be ultimately faster because the cars mass is therefor (in theory) more controlled. On track on ultimate hard settings I actually doubt there's anything in it between OEM and TPC module all things being equal but happy to be proved wrong
i.e a track test as you're outlining.
The quality control issues are more of a concern. To be honest none of you guys really know if the module is even working properly.
I'm also not sure that being quicker is the purpose of the module but I'm sure TPC can tell us. In the soft mode on OEM car I find it too soft for certain roads especially for fast road work here in the UK where roads are terrible. This is exaggerated even more as my 997 turbo basically has GT2 RS engine set up so everything can lose composure even more quickly on a technical piece of road. On track I found the OEM sport setting absolutely fine but on road its far too hard for our roads here in the UK. A set up with an in-between setting is what I think TPC are maybe trying to give us and on road yes that set up will be ultimately faster because the cars mass is therefor (in theory) more controlled. On track on ultimate hard settings I actually doubt there's anything in it between OEM and TPC module all things being equal but happy to be proved wrong
i.e a track test as you're outlining.The quality control issues are more of a concern. To be honest none of you guys really know if the module is even working properly.
On whether the module is working properly, well we can feel the improved damping effects (compliant behavior), the improved stiffness, the absence of CEL (that TB993t experienced) and the modulation of the modes (i.e., subtle differences between modes 1-3, unlike TB993t's "always stiff" perception). All these lead me to believe my module is functioning as intended but like you said, we could be wrong...

Honestly I think TB993t had a unique one-off unfortunate experience...numerous reviews both on here and Rennlist support that.




