View Poll Results: Which one would you choose?
750 HP HPF Turbo e46 M3 for 47K (27K car + 20K for turbo)



44
33.59%
415 HP e92 M3 for 70K



87
66.41%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll
Which M3 would you take?
Which M3 would you take?
So in this other thread the question was posed if the E46 M3 looked dated or not. As you can imagine the opinions varied.
Thread is here: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...d.php?t=136777
Then Zach (his screenname) and I started a friendly debate regarding the e46 M3 vs the e92 M3.
I offered the fact that a 30K mile e46 M3 is about 27K + 20K for an installed HPF stg 1 turbo gets you 750 hp. Versus 70K for 415hp e92 M3.
So let's have a poll. Which do you want?
750 hp e46 M3 for 47K
OR
415 hp E92 M3 for 70K
Thread is here: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...d.php?t=136777
Then Zach (his screenname) and I started a friendly debate regarding the e46 M3 vs the e92 M3.
I offered the fact that a 30K mile e46 M3 is about 27K + 20K for an installed HPF stg 1 turbo gets you 750 hp. Versus 70K for 415hp e92 M3.
So let's have a poll. Which do you want?
750 hp e46 M3 for 47K
OR
415 hp E92 M3 for 70K
to be honest...i dont see the need for that much hp on the street (turbo'd e46 m3) unless you want it for bragging rights.
pros of the e92
1) better suited year round as a daily driver (what the m3s are meant for)
2)warranty-bmw dealer being close by to stand by the product (hopefully! so long as it doesnt turn into the initial rod bearing denial of bmw)
3) even with 415 hp, youre not going to use it all on the street
on the other hand (cons of the e92)
1) i dont think its worth 70K-i drive the hell out of one and it was good but wasnt anything 'special' or monumental to me.
2) the car is going to depreciate like crazy-i believe as of today, 2 yr residual (or is it 3 yr?) is 51%
pros of the e92
1) better suited year round as a daily driver (what the m3s are meant for)
2)warranty-bmw dealer being close by to stand by the product (hopefully! so long as it doesnt turn into the initial rod bearing denial of bmw)
3) even with 415 hp, youre not going to use it all on the street
on the other hand (cons of the e92)
1) i dont think its worth 70K-i drive the hell out of one and it was good but wasnt anything 'special' or monumental to me.
2) the car is going to depreciate like crazy-i believe as of today, 2 yr residual (or is it 3 yr?) is 51%
Last edited by PorscheC4; Jul 12, 2008 at 05:42 PM.
So in this other thread the question was posed if the E46 M3 looked dated or not. As you can imagine the opinions varied.
Thread is here: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...d.php?t=136777
Then Zach (his screenname) and I started a friendly debate regarding the e46 M3 vs the e92 M3.
I offered the fact that a 30K mile e46 M3 is about 27K + 20K for an installed HPF stg 1 turbo gets you 750 hp. Versus 70K for 415hp e92 M3.
So let's have a poll. Which do you want?
750 hp e46 M3 for 47K
OR
415 hp E92 M3 for 70K
Thread is here: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...d.php?t=136777
Then Zach (his screenname) and I started a friendly debate regarding the e46 M3 vs the e92 M3.
I offered the fact that a 30K mile e46 M3 is about 27K + 20K for an installed HPF stg 1 turbo gets you 750 hp. Versus 70K for 415hp e92 M3.
So let's have a poll. Which do you want?
750 hp e46 M3 for 47K
OR
415 hp E92 M3 for 70K
get all the power u want from the factory.
well im young and would have to say the E46 HPF
but when you factor in a few things
-tires
-brakes
-subframe
-maintenance on a turboed s54
-tickets
i think i would have to say the E92 after all that
but when you factor in a few things
-tires
-brakes
-subframe
-maintenance on a turboed s54
-tickets
i think i would have to say the E92 after all that
Trending Topics
Not trying to sway opinions either way, but couldn't all the problems mentioned easily be solved for much less the 23K spread between the two cars.
Remember guys I am including price as a major component.
Remember guys I am including price as a major component.
. Plus with the 23K I can still buy a brand new GTI, WRX or something else for winter. For some guys here its not a problem but I rather have more than less and slowly build a nice car stable. Plus here we have probably the worst roads in the world and weather is bad half of the year. But 51% thats horrible.
Last edited by soon2befast4drs; Jul 14, 2008 at 08:03 AM.
I managed to put 60K in 2.5 years on my E46 with minimal problems besides 2 replaced downpipes. I was all stock. With that said though, i would never buy one out of warranty. They simply cost too much to fix. Ive seen alot fo E92's sitting stagnant on the dealer lots, imo i believe this is because they are just too high priced. But...I dont think there is anything better then the BMW warranties. And with the fact that the E46 engine was a very highly stressed engine to start, I could only imagine the amount of problems that straight 6 would come up wiht haveing 750hp squeezed out of it. My vote is for the E92. The mods will come for that one not long down the road...
OK then add $5k to the price. The gist of the comparison is still the same.
I was wondering the same thing and forgot to comment on it. Considering my 03 SMG with 96K on the clock got a payout of 30G's when i totalled it back in november. Ive seen E46's up in and near the 40's still.
For 28K-32K with about 30K on the clock.
Ahh..i was just speaking from my personal experience. Im sure the price must have dropped with all the 08's now sitting on dealer lots.... Again...after almost getting charged $2300 from the dealer to replace my downpipes because they kept sending the CEL off...(and that was twice that it happened, luckily the "parts warranty" was still in place when the second set failed) I stick by my plan of never owning a bmw without a warranty



