Tuning/Modifications

KA - In Memory of my Mom (Vincee) and best friend Michael J. Maring

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 90 votes, 4.16 average.
 
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #2866  
Zippy's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,787
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Rep Power: 209
Zippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond repute
Cool Chad. I remember us discussing the use of Variable Vane Tubos... 5-6 years ago. After reading through A.G. Bell's Forced Induction Performance Tuning, as recommended by you. The view back then was that they were not practical. Amazing how things change. It will be interesting to see how much the low RPM will be improved on a GT42R . Any info on this you can share?
 
Old Feb 5, 2009 | 09:08 PM
  #2867  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Zippy
Cool Chad. I remember us discussing the use of Variable Vane Tubos... 5-6 years ago. After reading through A.G. Bell's Forced Induction Performance Tuning, as recommended by you. The view back then was that they were not practical. Amazing how things change. It will be interesting to see how much the low RPM will be improved on a GT42R . Any info on this you can share?
Mike,

The variable vanes were not practicable because there wasn't a metal available that would take the heat generated by this application. Up until very recently, 900 degrees F was about the best temperature the available materials could handle in this vane application. Until very recently only smaller turbo's could be made for. The 997tt application was a breakthrough even though it is a somewhat small turbo.

New space age application metals are the reason for this type of turbo's advance.

As soon as I get permission I will share. This is like, although not on the same level of importance as the Techart GT II front end I got my hands on years ago. It was the first one outside of Techart Germany that was available period. I remember the US Techart rep in Southern California giving me a call wanting to know how I got one months before he could. The same type of situation is true with these turbo's.
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 5, 2009 at 09:14 PM.
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #2868  
Zippy's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,787
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Rep Power: 209
Zippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond repute
That's very exciting Chad. These could be a real game changer.
 
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #2869  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by cjv
We will be sending the following parts to Swain for coating. The heads, valves, springs and transmission gears are already completed.

Pistons
Gold Coat on Dome and PC-9 on Skirt

Cylinder Heads - TBC™ Thermal Barrier Coating in Combustion Chambers and on Valve Faces

Flow Coating for Intake Ports

Valve and Valve Train Components

Face and Radius Side TBC
Stem PPM Low Friction
Valve Springs PPM Low Friction
Solid Cam Follower PPM Low Friction

Engine Bottom End Components

Bearings PPM

Intake Manifolds

Top and Bottom TBC Ceramic
Inside Runners Flow Coating

Transmission Gears PPM Low Friction
Intercoolers BBE Heat Radiating

White Lightning (TBC-EX) Exhaust, Turbo Charger Housing


Gold Coat Ceramic Armor – A ceramic Thermal Barrier Coating designed specifically for piston domes in extreme applications such as nitrous, turbo and superchargers. Applied about .003” thick.

PC-9 – The latest and most durable piston skirt coating and other applications. Applied about .0008” thick when applied to piston skirts.

PPM – A thin, high load solid film lubricant used for parts with little or no room for a coating. Bearings and other parts are often coated with PPM. Applied about .0002” thick.

White Lightning (TBC-EX) – A ceramic thermal barrier primarily used on the outside of exhaust parts. Applied approximately .015” thick.

BBE – A heat radiating coating to dissipate heat and improve cooling.

Flow Coat – Non-wetable low friction coating.
Hope this does not get too boring. We are currently doing the bottom fit up prior to sending the parts to Swaintech for coating. S Car Go wants to run the bearing a tad on the loose side for this motor and the Swain coating for the bearings adds 2/10,000 thickness. Therefore we want to emery cloth the bearings 2/10,000 under prior to the applying the coatings.

In addition the pistons are being manufactured to compensate for the 8/10,000 coating for the skirts and the 3/1000 coating for the domes.

For those intersted in costs for coating the parts they are as follows:

pistons and skirts $52.50 each
rods bearings $35.00 a set
main bearings $41.50 a set
headers @ $250.00 a set
crank counter weights $250.00
rods $25.00 each
intake $250.00
turbo's $100.00 each
oil pump gears $65.00
intercoolers $100.00 each
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 12, 2009 at 08:37 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #2870  
KhanNSX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 519
From: Minneapolis, MN
Rep Power: 54
KhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud ofKhanNSX has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by cjv
Hope this does not get too boring. We are currently doing the bottom fit up prior to sending the parts to Swainteck for coating. S Car Go wants to run the bearing a tad on the loose side for this motor and the Swain coating for the bearings adds 2/10,000 thickness. Therefore we want to emery cloth the bearings 2/10,000 under prior to the applying the coatings.

In addition the pistons are being manufactured to compensate for the 8/10,000 coating for the skirts and the 3/1000 coating for the domes.

For those intersted in costs for coating the parts they are as follows:

pistons and skirts $52.50 each
rods bearings $35.00 a set
main bearings $41.50 a set
headers @ $250.00 a set
crank counter weights $250.00
rods $25.00 each
intake $250.00
turbo's $100.00 each
oil pump gears $65.00
intercoolers $100.00 each
Not boring at all, some cool info right there. I'm considering the coating for the intercoolers, so any more hard data on the results would be great.
 
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 07:11 PM
  #2871  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by KhanNSX
Not boring at all, some cool info right there. I'm considering the coating for the intercoolers, so any more hard data on the results would be great.
According to Richard at Swain, the intercooler coating will increase the overall efficiency between 5 to 7 percent.

He also stated the best investment performance and longevity wise is to coat the piston domes and skirts along with the rod and main bearings. The rest according to him has diminishing returns.
 
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #2872  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
I just received this e-mail from Neil ......... there appears to be another small delay.

Chad,

I am making a small change to the Liner making the top a lot stronger. As of this date we have had no failures, but further FEA work shows we can do better. We also want to coat the outside now with another special coating which should help even more with the contact with the coolant. The new updated changes only apply to the big bore Liners above 107.40mm.

These changes are immediate and the current batch of Liners will be used for NA applications only. I want the Turbo applications to have the newer design. I expect this to put back the delivery some 4 weeks. I will know more by early next week. I have asked for 1 set to be finished urgently for you so we do not hold you up any longer.

The ”rush” batch of 6 will need to be paid for in advance. As soon as I hear early next week, I will email you the new delivery date.

Neil
 
Old Feb 12, 2009 | 09:55 PM
  #2873  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Hmmmmm ........ 82.4 mm stroke by 107.4 mm bore.

Did someone say 4.5 liters or more precisely 4.477 liters. Garrett GT42R's custom cams custom GT3 heads on the fly programable 0-150 shot wet nitrous and designed for 2.4 bar

The displacement is now a match for the flow of our heads. The heads tested out at 25 inches of water as follows :



( I guess our approximate cam lift spec has been disclosed)


Killer Angel ....... you're clear for launch, T minus 124 days
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 24, 2011 at 07:50 PM.
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #2874  
Turbochris's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,204
From: Huntington Beach - CA
Rep Power: 92
Turbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond reputeTurbochris has a reputation beyond repute
Nice!!
 
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 08:13 PM
  #2875  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Has anyone had any experience with this shifter?

http://www.cartronic-motorsport.de/cartronic_sqs.php
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 16, 2009 at 08:15 PM.
Old Feb 22, 2009 | 10:48 PM
  #2876  
germeezy1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,571
From: Kirkland
Rep Power: 179
germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !
Wait , wow I thought 9ff was pushing the envelope at 4.1 liters....4.5 liters and GT42R's....I know were talking 4 digits, but how much over?

I bet this engine will love nitrous


 
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #2877  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by germeezy1
Wait , wow I thought 9ff was pushing the envelope at 4.1 liters....4.5 liters and GT42R's....I know were talking 4 digits, but how much over?

I bet this engine will love nitrous


There are many combinations of stroke and bore to increase displacement.

The costs for adding displacement are not as much as you think. Where the costs pile up is modifying what is available or just making your own prototype. A 80.4 mm Arrow Precision crank is available for about 6K. 102.4 mm steel liners 4K, pistons 1.8K and rods 1.8K. That is a 10K add for 4.0 liters. Start pushing bore and stroke much past those numbers and costs skyrocket. Start improving on the basic components and costs also rise fast.

Another problem is changing parts. I have so many extra valves, cranks, rods, pistons, etc that I could build at least three motors. This happens either because I have either discovered something new or just didn't get it right the first time.

I guess what I am trying to say, if I knew what I know now, the costs would have been a lot less.

What makes this motor nitrous friendly is the slightly lower compression along with the ceramic coated pistons, valves, combustion chambers and exhaust ports.
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 24, 2009 at 09:03 PM.
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #2878  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by m42racer
Chad,

Just read the email from Neil. That must be a "typo". 107.40mm??

I have not spoken to him lately, but I know there is a lot of new stuff they are working on. I am sure you know more than anyone what is going on.

Great work. You are going to have an amazing car.
Simon.

107.4 is about 2 mm more than what I was expecting. The 105.7 mm liners were requiring a good amount of machine work all by themselves. I can only imagine what 107.4 would require.

I have been out of state for the last week. I'll be talking to Neil sometime this week. At this point a couple more millimeters would be nice, but I don't want it at the cost of more delays. I want this car running by June 16th ........ this year.
 

Last edited by cjv; Feb 24, 2009 at 09:21 PM.
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 10:01 PM
  #2879  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Thread Starter
|
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Spoke with Rob @ S Car Go today. He said he would be sending me some pics tomorrow.
 
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #2880  
HotRodGuy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,873
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Rep Power: 580
HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !
it's a day past "tomorrow" Chad
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 90 votes, 4.16 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:57 PM.