991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ongoing change over valve issues on 991?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 04:54 PM
  #1  
SM_ATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,164
From: Brussels
Rep Power: 159
SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !
Ongoing change over valve issues on 991?

I do not mean to light a fire for nothing, but I got increasingly concerned by what seems to be a lingering issue with change over valves in the 991.

Here's a picture of the part in question (the part number is 7PP906283B, now replaced by 7PP906283C):



Based on a quick research on the internet, it looks like Porsche was aware of the issue for early 2012 builds and that launched a recall campaign (WC-43) intended at replacing 8 of these valves.

In my case, my sport exhaust stopped functioning and 3 out of the 4 change over valves I have checked were bad (I did not check the others).

There are also various threads about 991's built at different times that have had heating/cooling system issued. Again, the same part was the culprit.

I find it intriguing that it has been going on for so long and that Porsche has apparently not resolved the issue.
The first concern I have is that you may not always detect that something is wrong: it is only when my sport exhaust stopped working properly that I discovered it, but the valves controlling the symposer and the intake flap were already bad. The second concern is that I read that this part would be used in more critical components (PDK).

Change over valves (simple solenoids in fact) are a very common part and Pierburg, the manufacturer, supplies it to a lot of car makers, including for the previous 911 models. This part number is specific to the 991 and seems to be the one having an issue. They may not be sealing properly allowing moisture in, causing the valves to malfunction over time.

I am not posting this to alarm you but to keep this in mind and report if you had other issues resulting from the failure of that same part.
Having already had 3 bad solenoids, I intend to drop the car at the dealership to get it checked.
 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	12312631214_6b0a98789e_z.jpg
Views:	10776
Size:	95.3 KB
ID:	331795  
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 05:08 PM
  #2  
dux's Avatar
dux
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,055
From: Just visiting the planet
Rep Power: 87
dux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks for the feedback.
Any other symptoms that a layman can look out for?

Apparently it doesn't throw an error code, which in Porsche World means everything is just fine..
 
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
SM_ATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,164
From: Brussels
Rep Power: 159
SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by dux
Thanks for the feedback.
Any other symptoms that a layman can look out for?

Apparently it doesn't throw an error code, which in Porsche World means everything is just fine..
Nope. Not 'mission critical' hence not monitored part. This is a very common part with a low rate of failure from what I have been told. The 991 issue is an anomaly...
 
Old Feb 10, 2014 | 05:26 PM
  #4  
bboerit's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 57
From: NJ
Rep Power: 19
bboerit is just really nicebboerit is just really nicebboerit is just really nicebboerit is just really nicebboerit is just really nice
Originally Posted by SM_ATL
I do not mean to light a fire for nothing, but I got increasingly concerned by what seems to be a lingering issue with change over valves in the 991.

Here's a picture of the part in question (the part number is 7PP906283B, now replaced by 7PP906283C):



Based on a quick research on the internet, it looks like Porsche was aware of the issue for early 2012 builds and that launched a recall campaign (WC-43) intended at replacing 8 of these valves.

In my case, my sport exhaust stopped functioning and 3 out of the 4 change over valves I have checked were bad (I did not check the others).

There are also various threads about 991's built at different times that have had heating/cooling system issued. Again, the same part was the culprit.

I find it intriguing that it has been going on for so long and that Porsche has apparently not resolved the issue.
The first concern I have is that you may not always detect that something is wrong: it is only when my sport exhaust stopped working properly that I discovered it, but the valves controlling the symposer and the intake flap were already bad. The second concern is that I read that this part would be used in more critical components (PDK).

Change over valves (simple solenoids in fact) are a very common part and Pierburg, the manufacturer, supplies it to a lot of car makers, including for the previous 911 models. This part number is specific to the 991 and seems to be the one having an issue. They may not be sealing properly allowing moisture in, causing the valves to malfunction over time.

I am not posting this to alarm you but to keep this in mind and report if you had other issues resulting from the failure of that same part.
Having already had 3 bad solenoids, I intend to drop the car at the dealership to get it checked.
I'm sure I speak for most if not all when I say many thanks not only for bringing this to our attention but for also keeping us updated. I have a May/June '13 build with no known issue yet...
 
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 03:51 AM
  #5  
19hole's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 297
From: on a golf course...
Rep Power: 41
19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of19hole has much to be proud of
I have had all of mine replaced under the campaign. In addition, one failed this winter and the result was no heat.
 
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 07:13 AM
  #6  
Go123's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 259
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Rep Power: 26
Go123 has a spectacular aura aboutGo123 has a spectacular aura about
Is the new part problem free? When did they switch to using the new part? Thanks
 
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
plenum's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 675
From: Chalfont, PA
Rep Power: 55
plenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by Go123
Is the new part problem free? When did they switch to using the new part? Thanks
I just had this part replaced yesterday, as I had lost all heat to the cabin. On the job description sheet, the "New" part number is listed as replacement, so I am not sure that the part replaced was the "old" or "new" part #. I should have asked.... My assumption is that the "C" new part replaced an "B" part that was already on my '14 C4S (build date 06/13), but now I am wondering if the "C" part failed?

I'll ask my service rep if he can elaborate. There was no mention of a campaign that is currently open -- but my rep did say they had seen this happen on a few cars in the past.

Here is a link to my previous post:
 
Old Feb 11, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #8  
lunarx's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 665
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 46
lunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to behold
Great Info!
Thanks!

Those valves are all over the car.

PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION MG SG ILL. NO.
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 05 105-05 (Water Tube, for heater)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 06 106-00 (2 Valves, Air Cleaner & Symposer)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 06 106-05 (same as above)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-10 (Intake Distributor)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-15 (Engine Vacuum System, non S)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-17 (2 Valves, Engine Vacuum System, S)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-20 (3 Valves, Engine Vacuum System, X51)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 2 02 202-10 (Exhaust Standard)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 2 02 202-15 (Exhaust Sport)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 3 02 302-15 (Cooler Trans Manual)
7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 3 60 360-00 (2 Valves, Cooler Trans PDK)

With those valves controlling the Trans Cooler, I wonder if bad valves are what lead to PDK failures?
 

Last edited by lunarx; Feb 12, 2014 at 01:57 AM.
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
SM_ATL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,164
From: Brussels
Rep Power: 159
SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !SM_ATL Is a GOD !
Change Over Valves failure - part 2 I found the following schematic about the vacuum system in the 991 Service Information book (you can buy it from Suncoast BTW):



It confirms my fear that more critical items can go wrong due to failed solenoids: i.e. shut off valves for engine coolant or ATF (= automatic transmission fluid for PDK). The Porsche document nevertheless mentions that "electric solenoid valves in the vacuum system are fully diagnosable (short circuit/open circuit); electrical faults result in an entry in the DME control unit and the PDK unit". I nevertheless did not get any alert for my failed solenoids and will definitely get the other ones checked ASAP.
 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	12502034803_63a1b7b24f_c.jpg
Views:	7412
Size:	185.5 KB
ID:	333568  

Last edited by SM_ATL; Feb 13, 2014 at 01:53 PM.
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 10:14 AM
  #10  
dux's Avatar
dux
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,055
From: Just visiting the planet
Rep Power: 87
dux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond reputedux has a reputation beyond repute
Very interesting.

I wonder what symptoms would be displayed if 7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-17 (2 Valves, Engine Vacuum System, S) were to fail?
 
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 01:36 PM
  #11  
Christophosphorus's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 912
From: California
Rep Power: 56
Christophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to behold
Interesting stuff, Serge. I wouldn't mind getting these checked out, as well. I just hate to think that the dealer won't really bother doing a thorough check if I don't already have an obvious problem. They'd probably come back with an "all is well" answer.
 
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #12  
plenum's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 675
From: Chalfont, PA
Rep Power: 55
plenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant futureplenum has a brilliant future
Well, I agree, Christo- I was just at the dealer this past Monday for a valve failure on my 06/13 build '14 C4S and the part that failed was replaced without ANY mention of other valves being checked, and certainly not replaced. The Service rep even mentioned that "they've seen something 'similar' on other cars" in the past. If there was a campaign previously, then it must have expired or something and my June 13 build was not included.

I do intend on taking back to the dealer at some point -- tried talking to them today, but they were all literally out in the lot digging cars out!!!

Serge- thank you AGAIN for maintaining such a great level of detailed information on this board!
 
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 01:54 PM
  #13  
Christophosphorus's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 912
From: California
Rep Power: 56
Christophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to beholdChristophosphorus is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by jawells1
Well, I agree, Christo- I was just at the dealer this past Monday for a valve failure on my 06/13 build '14 C4S and the part that failed was replaced without ANY mention of other valves being checked, and certainly not replaced. The Service rep even mentioned that "they've seen something 'similar' on other cars" in the past. If there was a campaign previously, then it must have expired or something and my June 13 build was not included.
Amazing... I really do wonder how much of their alleged "checks" actually take place. I'm not paranoid by any means, but some horror stories really make me think twice about these things.
 
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 02:46 PM
  #14  
lunarx's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 665
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 46
lunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by dux
Very interesting.

I wonder what symptoms would be displayed if 7PP906283B CHANGE-OVER VALVE 1 07 107-17 (2 Valves, Engine Vacuum System, S) were to fail?
Hard to say on that one as it's not clear where the hoses go, for that item.

These are the diagrams and in most cases you can see the item being controlled.





















 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	WaterTubeCtrl.JPG
Views:	5865
Size:	255.9 KB
ID:	333748   Click image for larger version

Name:	AirCleaner.JPG
Views:	5705
Size:	242.5 KB
ID:	333749   Click image for larger version

Name:	AirCleaner_VacCtrl.JPG
Views:	5906
Size:	194.1 KB
ID:	333750   Click image for larger version

Name:	IntakeDist.JPG
Views:	5631
Size:	302.3 KB
ID:	333751   Click image for larger version

Name:	EngVacMA1.04.JPG
Views:	5565
Size:	217.2 KB
ID:	333752  


Last edited by lunarx; Feb 13, 2014 at 02:57 PM.
Old Feb 13, 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #15  
lunarx's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 665
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 46
lunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to beholdlunarx is a splendid one to behold
More Diagrams
 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	EngVacMA1.03.JPG
Views:	5532
Size:	222.7 KB
ID:	333753   Click image for larger version

Name:	EngVacX51.JPG
Views:	5592
Size:	228.4 KB
ID:	333754   Click image for larger version

Name:	EngVacBaseExh.JPG
Views:	5529
Size:	187.5 KB
ID:	333756   Click image for larger version

Name:	EngVacSportExh.JPG
Views:	5645
Size:	210.1 KB
ID:	333759   Click image for larger version

Name:	HeatExcManualTrans.JPG
Views:	5572
Size:	230.6 KB
ID:	333761  



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.