996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

997.2 Intercoolers - Wow!

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 15 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 05:10 PM
  #346  
rdss's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,018
From: el salvador
Rep Power: 147
rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !
Is not the boost builded in the WG's ? If it's so,boost has nothing to do with the pressure in the I/C's..............or am i lost ?? Please someone explain that to me.
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 06:05 PM
  #347  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by rdss
Is not the boost builded in the WG's ? If it's so,boost has nothing to do with the pressure in the I/C's..............or am i lost ?? Please someone explain that to me.
The waste gates regulate how fast the turbo spins via bypass of gasses around the turbine.
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 06:09 PM
  #348  
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,848
Rep Power: 457
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
You have to look at the whole system, not just the IC piping as the point of restriction. At some point, the flow is restricted elsewhere like the turbos or exhaust. That said, pressure is pressure and at some point the plastic end tanks will pop off or even leak before then. To get an accurate determination, one would have to pressure test the ICs and determine at what PSI they start leaking or pop off.
I agree with you however the point in question was the relationship between pressure and volume of flow with all other constants unchanged. Like you said, build a rig, hook up an air compressor, and see at what PSI the end tanks pop off.
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; May 17, 2012 at 06:20 PM.
Old May 17, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #349  
pumptech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,030
From: houston
Rep Power: 82
pumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond repute
should be. if P=F x R and it does. 1.5 =Flow x (Resistance)

i don't know a good value for resistance in the turbo plumbing but is relatively constant as your piping is always the same. so just pick a number like 1000. resistance is a function of tube length, diameter and viscosity. but these are constant for any set up. just plug in a number for resistance.

1.4 = F x (1000)
1.5 = F x (1000)
1.7 = F x (1000)



Originally Posted by bad107
a k16 with 5" intercoolers at 1.5 bar puts out the same air as a gt35 at 1.5 bar?

I understand if the piping is the restriction then it will only flow what the pipe lets it, but the oem piping size of ~2.2" is plenty big for most turbos.
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 08:59 PM
  #350  
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,083
From: Texas
Rep Power: 673
Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !Dr_jitsu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by bad107
thought you would be too busy making smoothies to see this
True, but I take breaks for the epic
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 09:51 PM
  #351  
Powell's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,475
From: Friendswood, TX
Rep Power: 385
Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !Powell Is a GOD !
I've been asked opinions on these and honestly for a smaller HP build the cost factor favors these any day of the week. Though honestly at anything 550rwhp or more I'd do a full sized IC. I had Blown6's on my GT3076/K24 (old hybrids) and then I did 6" when I did the Boost Logic kit. My brother's car has a set of 6" IC on the shelf that will go on as soon as the Tilton comes off backorder.

I'm not a Engineer by any mean, but I go by actual experience (not what this number x number = HAS TO BE THIS)... 1.6bar on a K24 (using as example) and 1.6bar on a GT55 is the same amount of restriction but you all forget about the volume... The amount of air being moved in is a LOT more. I'm not saying you all are wrong on the reason why it broke, but its like one thing nobody seems to pay attention.
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 06:22 AM
  #352  
pumptech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,030
From: houston
Rep Power: 82
pumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond reputepumptech has a reputation beyond repute
I'm just trying to make the point that pressure, which is directly proportional to flow is what is popping these things. its not the flow. as flow goes up and resistance stays the same pressure goes up. it has to.

Just for reference flow (F) IS volume, whether its high, low, big turbo, small turbo, no turbo.
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 11:39 AM
  #353  
earl3's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
I'll try to shed some light onto Ben's (bad107) dilemma. Engine's can "flow more at the same psi" when volumetric efficiency (VE) or density ratio is increased (or rpm but assume that didn't change). When he bolted on his A28s vs K16 hybrids, the VE of the engine went up due to better compressors, compressor housings, turbines and turbine housings (density ratio probably went up slightly as well with a more efficient compressor). When his VE and density ratios went up, the mass flow rate (MFR) capability of the engine went up. With the same settings on his boost controller, boost would have dropped (boost is a measure of restriction like pumptech said) and he would have had to have adjusted his boost controller (turned it "up") to make the same amount of boost as before. Every intercooler core has some amount of pressure loss the will increase a flow is increased, that is to say that the static pressure on the inlet will be higher than the outlet. In Ben's case, running 1.7 bar with improved VE and thus improved MFR likely put the inlet tanks well beyond 2.0 bar of pressure which ended with an earth shattering kaboom.

ASLAN, the 16 row coolers will get their own writeup thread
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #354  
winnigt2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
I am looking at this from a purely physics stand point. Maybe there is something else at play so if someone can explain how you can flow more air through the same pathway (IC+piping) and have the pressure remain unchanged than I'm all ears... I'm not arguing by any means, just curious what I'm missing.....
bigger turbos produce same boost at lower iat....bigger turbos produce same boost with lower backpressure...so indeed a bigger turbo produce more power at the same boost level...(ore we can say a more efficient turbo produce more power at the same boost level)

i am not a fan of this intercoolers if you pay low iat with more restriction...
 

Last edited by winnigt2; May 18, 2012 at 11:44 AM.
Old May 18, 2012 | 11:53 AM
  #355  
Basic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 209
From: Canada
Rep Power: 43
Basic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant futureBasic has a brilliant future
Just want to give props to Earl3 for your write-up, I used it to install my 997.2 I/C recently and it was much appreciated and saved me some figuring and time. Thanks.

I did end up using extra factory straps, cut a pair to get the right length then tig welded on the edges to join them. Worked great and still spring like stock, I'll post up a few pictures later on.
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #356  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
[QUOTE=earl3;3547515]I'll try to shed some light onto Ben's (bad107) dilemma. In Ben's case, running 1.7 bar with improved VE and thus improved MFR likely put the inlet tanks well beyond 2.0 bar of pressure which ended with an earth shattering kaboom.


Ben blew the end tank on the first set soon after he put them on at 1.5 bar... plus his hose kept popping off at the lower end tank- I made custom aluminum fittings to hold( It did). Then he blew the second set of end tanks at 1.7 bar... all on A28s...
BTW, I made him do a pressure test( I had no interest other then he purchased a exhaust from me a year ago) because he was asking me to help him find some problems... Had he not done a pressure test on the car from the turbos he would never know his endtanks are leaking...
So I suggest those who have these ICs do a pressure test to 20 psi from the turbos... if it holds smile and keep on driving..
markski
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old May 18, 2012 | 01:42 PM
  #357  
bbywu's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,774
From: OR Room 5
Rep Power: 1007
bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !bbywu Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Ben blew the end tank on the first set soon after he put them on at 1.5 bar... plus his hose kept popping off at the lower end tank- I made custom aluminum fittings to hold( It did). Then he blew the second set of end tanks at 1.7 bar... all on A28s...
BTW, I made him do a pressure test( I had no interest other then he purchased a exhaust from me a year ago) because he was asking me to help him find some problems... Had he not done a pressure test on the car from the turbos he would never know his endtanks are leaking...
So I suggest those who have these ICs do a pressure test to 20 psi from the turbos... if it holds smile and keep on driving..
markski
The 997 GT2RS runs a peak boost of 1.6 Bar. I am having trouble understanding why Ben had problems at less pressure? Is this a problem with his set of intercoolers or an inherent problem with the design of the OEM ICs?
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 01:50 PM
  #358  
bad107's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,364
From: houston, TX
Rep Power: 96
bad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond reputebad107 has a reputation beyond repute
The first intercooler did not really blow, it developed a leak along the edge. I am sure it would have blown soon though

I sent the intercooler to Porsche and they sent me a new one under warranty.

I just sent my current broken intercooler back to Porsche as well. The replacements will be on the marketplace soon
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 01:56 PM
  #359  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
It seems like the plastic end tanks are definitely a weak link even at 1.5-1.6 bar. A28s spool up very quickly and perhaps that "hammering" causes more fatique than a vtg with a more gradual increase. I don't really know--just speculating. Could be boost spike too? Without doing a controlled test with accurate measuring instruments and a number of ICs for statistical relevance, it's all speculation. That said, there seems to be enough cases to question how solid these things are built even at 1.5 bar, i.e. do they start leaking over time?
 

Last edited by TTdude; May 18, 2012 at 02:04 PM.
Old May 18, 2012 | 03:26 PM
  #360  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by bad107
The first intercooler did not really blow, it developed a leak along the edge. I am sure it would have blown soon though

I sent the intercooler to Porsche and they sent me a new one under warranty.

I just sent my current broken intercooler back to Porsche as well. The replacements will be on the marketplace soon
sorry for misquoting... I recall the leak was at less then 1.5 bar... you even sent me the video... lol
I suggest those who are doing work around the car next time to pressure test the car... its good to do at least once a year anyways...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL






You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 15 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 PM.