997.2 Intercoolers - Wow!
A while back we took them to a local company called Wilson Manifolds for flow testing. These were our results. I suspected a long time ago that they'd be great for cooling, but not so much for flow. They actually had worse flow then .1 turbo IC's, but cooling efficiency is much improved because of the new core design.
But like Markski said...for $1000 at low boost...definitely a no brainer.

But like Markski said...for $1000 at low boost...definitely a no brainer.
this is what I did a week ago at 1.3 bar boost with very small turbos.
may be flow is a tiny worse but the IAT is best bang for the buck.
(speed in kph, temps in celsius)
Last edited by RS38; May 21, 2012 at 01:19 AM. Reason: ..
What type of turbos do you have in your setup? VTGs get pretty hot.
A while back we took them to a local company called Wilson Manifolds for flow testing. These were our results. I suspected a long time ago that they'd be great for cooling, but not so much for flow. They actually had worse flow then .1 turbo IC's, but cooling efficiency is much improved because of the new core design.
But like Markski said...for $1000 at low boost...definitely a no brainer.

But like Markski said...for $1000 at low boost...definitely a no brainer.
Thanks
would you please explain how a bigger ic(997.2)can flow less than 997.1 ic which is smaller and has more restrictive tanks ,more resistance....all guys using 997.2 ic realised a drop in boost,so automaticaly flow shoud increase since flow and pressure are inversely proportional
Thanks
Thanks
Why is this? Well...that's a question for Porsche engineers. We simply took all 4 intercoolers to an independent shop called Wilson Manifolds for testing. There are the results.
Keep in mind that the graph only represents flow, not efficiency of cooling. The denser core of the .2 intercoolers definitely provides better cooling, but is more restrictive by nature. The redesigned end-tanks certainly help, but obviously the core is still restrictive, or we wouldn't be seeing the bottom tanks blowing off. Also, the intercooler itself is physically the same size as the .1.
Why is this? Well...that's a question for Porsche engineers. We simply took all 4 intercoolers to an independent shop called Wilson Manifolds for testing. There are the results.
Why is this? Well...that's a question for Porsche engineers. We simply took all 4 intercoolers to an independent shop called Wilson Manifolds for testing. There are the results.
I'm not here trying to sell intercoolers or say why one is better then the other. I'm just offering the results of testing that was done independently outside of our shop, in order to maybe help explain why suddenly people are having issues using the .2 coolers in higher HP setups.

it does not mean to be thermodynamical inefficient to have less flow but denser and cooler air, but a slightly higher boost before the ICs.
the principle is similar to the
The expansion intake system introduced in the 997 GT2 and explained here:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...qDfUz_FSLkEEgQ
the principle is similar to the
The expansion intake system introduced in the 997 GT2 and explained here:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...qDfUz_FSLkEEgQ
the principle is similar to the
The expansion intake system introduced in the 997 GT2 and explained here:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...qDfUz_FSLkEEgQ
The expansion intake system introduced in the 997 GT2 and explained here:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&...qDfUz_FSLkEEgQ




