Nissan GTR Forum for the R32, R33, R34 and R35 "Godzilla"

base gt-r 7:27 @ 'ring (on spec-v wheels)

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 27, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #256  
germeezy1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,571
From: Kirkland
Rep Power: 179
germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !germeezy1 Is a GOD !
Ok so can we all sing We shall Overcome and admit that 7:27 is pie in the sky, but that fact doesn't overcome how good the GTR is.
 
Old May 27, 2009 | 10:58 PM
  #257  
Deuuuce's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,115
From: Roseville, CA
Rep Power: 135
Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !Deuuuce Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by gp900bj
Precisely what do you think the Targa Tasmania is? Some kind of Sunday drive where people sit around eating cheese and *******s? This isn't Gumball you know.

Targa Tasmania, Targa Wrest point, Quit Targa West and Rally Tasmania are all timed competitive events, officiated and managed in the same format as the WRC and ARC. The only difference is that they use production cars on closed public roads, very similar in structure to the WRC tarmac stages that are run through Europe.
Reading comprehension FTL.
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #258  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Charlie
Stock GTR tested by SportsAuto gets 7:38 at the 'Ring' by HVS. Must've been a 'ringer' for sure!!! Either that or SportsAuto and HVS have been bribed by Nissan.
What was Porshe's claim for the GTR again? Something in the line of...."we couldn't get it to go any faster than 7:54" hmmmmm......


+1...
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 05:18 PM
  #259  
monaroCountry's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 560
From: Sydney
Rep Power: 41
monaroCountry is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Charlie
Stock GTR tested by SportsAuto gets 7:38 at the 'Ring' by HVS. Must've been a 'ringer' for sure!!! Either that or SportsAuto and HVS have been bribed by Nissan.
What was Porshe's claim for the GTR again? Something in the line of...."we couldn't get it to go any faster than 7:54" hmmmmm......


Right up there with the 435hp Porsche GT3, and the ZO6 with Eagle F1 runcraps.....wow.

Here I was thinking that this car could run with proper supercars like the Enzo and Zonda in base form.

Porsche's time is where the bulk of the reviews have been i.e. in the 7:50's.
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #260  
BD-'s Avatar
BD-
Banned
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 342
From: Ponziville, AIG
Rep Power: 38
BD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Right up there with the 435hp Porsche GT3, and the ZO6 with Eagle F1 runcraps.....wow.

Here I was thinking that this car could run with proper supercars like the Enzo and Zonda in base form.

Porsche's time is where the bulk of the reviews have been i.e. in the 7:50's.
I see dumb people.
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #261  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Right up there with the 435hp Porsche GT3, and the ZO6 with Eagle F1 runcraps.....wow.

Here I was thinking that this car could run with proper supercars like the Enzo and Zonda in base form.

Porsche's time is where the bulk of the reviews have been i.e. in the 7:50's.
Who said Nissan was trying to shoot for the Enzo? Who fabricated this comparison?

It sounds like your moving the measuring stick everytime the results prove to exceed your expectations...

Why not just slam it, because it can't keep up with Sebastian Vettel in his F-1 car?
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #262  
monaroCountry's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 560
From: Sydney
Rep Power: 41
monaroCountry is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Who said Nissan was trying to shoot for the Enzo? Who fabricated this comparison?

It sounds like your moving the measuring stick everytime the results prove to exceed your expectations...

Why not just slam it, because it can't keep up with Sebastian Vettel in his F-1 car?
The goalposts was set by Nissan with their 7:26-7:27 stock based R35 GTR, this is what we have argued about. Most people and journalists have been saying that the GTR is not capable of achieving the time set by Nissan and that the car used was a ringer. A time of 7:38 is far more realistic and in line with other cars with the same specs i.e. the ZO6, Turbo and the GT3.

Originally Posted by BD-
I see dumb people.

Stop looking at the mirror, im absolutely sure that you cant see me .
 
Old May 29, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #263  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Just because someone dedicates more time around a particular track, doesn't mean it's a faster/better car.

I don't think anybody from Nissan ever compared this car to other cars such as the Koenigsegg CCX, Enzo, Zonda, etc...

The time may suggest that it can run with these cars, but perhaps these manufacturers aren't out to prove something on this particular track. And perhaps they don't care at all about what Nissan is doing there. People don't cross-shop an Enzo and a GT-R.
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 03:48 AM
  #264  
BD-'s Avatar
BD-
Banned
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 342
From: Ponziville, AIG
Rep Power: 38
BD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to beholdBD- is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by monaroCountry
The goalposts was set by Nissan with their 7:26-7:27 stock based R35 GTR, this is what we have argued about. Most people and journalists have been saying that the GTR is not capable of achieving the time set by Nissan and that the car used was a ringer. A time of 7:38 is far more realistic and in line with other cars with the same specs i.e. the ZO6, Turbo and the GT3.
The ZR1, GT2 (7.32) and GTR times can be compared because they were done with extensive practice. Marc Basseng's laps in the Enzo, MC12 and Zonda F CS are in a different league. They were done with far more limited practice. The difference between the GTR, MC12, Zonda F CS and Enzo are demonstrated by other non-'ring lap times.

Sport Auto's Porsche times are relatively nearer factory times because HvS has more experience with Porsches due to his position. This is demonstrated by comparing other GTR and Scuderia same-driver, non-'ring lap times with the GT2. I certainly don't believe that the Scuderia's position in SA's laps relative to the GT2 is representative of reality. The GT2 isn't even as fast as a Scuderia in a straight line at 'ring speeds, so there's no way that a rear-engined manual should be faster than a state-of-the-art MR paddle shift.
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 05:42 AM
  #265  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by BD-
The ZR1, GT2 (7.32) and GTR times can be compared because they were done with extensive practice. Marc Basseng's laps in the Enzo, MC12 and Zonda F CS are in a different league. They were done with far more limited practice. The difference between the GTR, MC12, Zonda F CS and Enzo are demonstrated by other non-'ring lap times.

Sport Auto's Porsche times are relatively nearer factory times because HvS has more experience with Porsches due to his position. This is demonstrated by comparing other GTR and Scuderia same-driver, non-'ring lap times with the GT2. I certainly don't believe that the Scuderia's position in SA's laps relative to the GT2 is representative of reality. The GT2 isn't even as fast as a Scuderia in a straight line at 'ring speeds, so there's no way that a rear-engined manual should be faster than a state-of-the-art MR paddle shift.
You seem to keep leaving out key information:

#1 Marc Basseng tested a CGT on the same day he did the Enzo, Zonda and MC-12 and still matched Porsches claimed time and within a couple of seconds of Nissan's. He also eclipsed Pagani's hired driver by 3 seconds. This does not support your limited testing theory.

#2 The ring has significant altitude, enough to make the very close in accleration FI GT2 significantly faster than the NA Scuderia. Not to mention the huge torque advantage for the hills and inclines.
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #266  
monaroCountry's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 560
From: Sydney
Rep Power: 41
monaroCountry is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by heavychevy
You seem to keep leaving out key information:

#1 Marc Basseng tested a CGT on the same day he did the Enzo, Zonda and MC-12 and still matched Porsches claimed time and within a couple of seconds of Nissan's. He also eclipsed Pagani's hired driver by 3 seconds. This does not support your limited testing theory.

#2 The ring has significant altitude, enough to make the very close in accleration FI GT2 significantly faster than the NA Scuderia. Not to mention the huge torque advantage for the hills and inclines.


Great point on one!!!!!!!!
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #267  
Doom4420's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 62
From: Ankeny, Iowa
Rep Power: 20
Doom4420 has a spectacular aura aboutDoom4420 has a spectacular aura about
Hi guys, I'm new to this forum. However, I've been called a Noob and that I don't know anything about cars from HeavyChevy and MonaroCounty. Seriously, is that all they do on 6speed is come and bash any thing and everything GTR?

Oh, hi MonaroCounty, HeavyChevy
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #268  
airflite1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 341
From: Greenbush MN
Rep Power: 49
airflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant future
Old May 30, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #269  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
The GT-R is the heaviest and has the least amount of power, and is redline limited by gear ratio to 195mph (GPS measured not the advertised 193mph).

You'd hope that cars with 160 more hp, and 600lbs less would fare better in a straightline or bowl.
 
Old May 30, 2009 | 03:46 PM
  #270  
airflite1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 341
From: Greenbush MN
Rep Power: 49
airflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant futureairflite1 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
The GT-R is the heaviest and has the least amount of power, and is redline limited by gear ratio to 195mph (GPS measured not the advertised 193mph).

You'd hope that cars with 160 more hp, and 600lbs less would fare better in a straightline or bowl.
When comparing performance this is what 90% of the GTRs will see. What most people are trying to get across is the people that do track their cars are going to run into cars that have their suspensions tuned for the track and with sticky tires just like the gtr. If I had a gtr I wouldn't be happy with the stiff ride and rapid tire wear. for what I use a car for, the Turbo fits me. If I was going to spend a lot of time at the track I'ld get a spec miata or an S2000.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 AM.