996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

996 Turbo or GTR?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #106  
vbmw335's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,215
From: Socal
Rep Power: 82
vbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by jpvarghese
For the $70-$80k you spend on a GT-R, you can't expect it to have a Porsche-like interior. The GT-R is miles ahead of the 996 turbo as far as performance goes. There's no comparison.

What's so special about the 996 interior anyways? It's as bland as it comes; oversized buttons, useless Nav, etc. With the GT-R, everything is integrated to the screen which itself has several functions. The only thing you can brag about is the leather covered surfaces, that's it. Now when it comes to the 997, it's a better quality all around car compared to the GT-R. It's a better package overall, IMO.
Interiors are subjective…Can you clarify what performance metrics that makes it miles ahead of 996 turbo? Miles ahead even when comparing stock vs stock is too strong especially when you are comparing a decade old technology to the latest and greatest from Japan. The fastest GTR with 800+ hp can trap only low 130. The fastest GTR can run the mile in the 190's. All of these feats can be achieved by a 996tt with just 600hp and will be bullet proof!

I have honestly given myself many chances to love the GTR, have had enough seat time by now….the appeal is not there…especially now it’s too slow for me compared to my modded 911. Maybe it’s because of my personal preference of 6 speed trans….just don’t like a heavy game boy like car.


I guess the only achievement GTR has is the ring #'s and that is the most widely debated topic. Either way you look at it the GTR needs loads and loads of HP to hide the weight and equal 911 performance. By adding all the hp ...it still has issues because of stress on other components (braking suspension etc..)/
 

Last edited by vbmw335; Oct 29, 2009 at 10:06 AM.
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #107  
buzzm's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,807
From: Boston
Rep Power: 144
buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !buzzm Is a GOD !
nissan is an impressive machine and i would be happy to own one but i really dont like the interior at all

trying to argue that one car is better than the other could go on forever, no-one is going to to give up and suddenly concede that their car is inferior

the 'unstopable force vs the immovable object' saying springs to mind

cant believe how angry and pissed off people get about this, parts of this thread would be more at home in a 6 year olds playground argument except it would be bigwheel vs skateboard
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 10:44 AM
  #108  
Monaco's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 897
Rep Power: 79
Monaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Prche951

boy, thank god I posted pics of all three interiors for all to see. The GTR interior is the worst, only someone with rose colored lenses would like it..


As for comparison, let me state again that the reason why NISSAN did not make the GTR a 6 speed manual, is because it would not have been any faster than a STOCK 996TT, the power to weight ratio of the GTR is identical to the 996TT, but the 996tt is the better car.


Gotta love how some can dish it out but can't take it. I guess that is what happens when you are in the JAY DEE EM crowd.
See, you are speaking hypothetically. IF the GT-R had this/that, but the case is that stock for stock the GT-R is a quicker car. The question was of a 996t vs. a GT-R. As far as the interior goes, under what criteria are you judging. By features, the GT-R wins. By quality, it's obvious the Porsche is better. So, no sir, you obviously can't take it. WTF do you mean when you say JDM crowd? I respect cars regardless of origin.


Originally Posted by vbmw335
Interiors are subjective…Can you clarify what performance metrics that makes it miles ahead of 996 turbo? Miles ahead even when comparing stock vs stock is too strong especially when you are comparing a decade old technology to the latest and greatest from Japan. The fastest GTR with 800+ hp can trap only low 130. The fastest GTR can run the mile in the 190's. All of these feats can be achieved by a 996tt with just 600hp and will be bullet proof!

I guess the only achievement GTR has is the ring #'s and that is the most widely debated topic. Either way you look at it the GTR needs loads and loads of HP to hide the weight and equal 911 performance. By adding all the hp ...it still has issues because of stress on other components (braking suspension etc..)/
Consistency is the name of the game here. Because of its gearbox, power delivery, and next to no loss in boost between shifts, it has a higher advantage in straight line acceleration. The AWD system is much more advanced no matter how you cut it; game boyish or not. In the end, though its about preference. I'm just throwing out the facts. Stock for stock, the GT-R is a better performing car.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #109  
Supercollider's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 172
From: Redmond, WA
Rep Power: 27
Supercollider is a jewel in the roughSupercollider is a jewel in the roughSupercollider is a jewel in the roughSupercollider is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by heavychevy

If your car isn't overheating at the track you are far too slow, that isn't made up, go check for yourself, I've seen it with my own eyes and there are enough complaints out there that it's very substantiated.

You take pride in stomping the gas pedal and running low 11's? No skill involved. Sorry I want more out of my driving experience, I like to work together with the car for results, so you missed yet ANOTHER thing the 996 TT is better than the GT-R at.
That's my experience as well, and the overheating I saw was tranny fluid temps, shortly followed by a tranny failure. That was on a not-so-hot day either (high 70's.) Unfortunately he never came back to DE days, when two months later we ran when it was 108 ambient and 148 track temp. I was comfy in an A/C 996TT X50.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #110  
jhuang25's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,406
From: OC, CA.
Rep Power: 123
jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !jhuang25 Is a GOD !
I think there are over 100 pages of this in multiple threads from last year... Peter, don't get into it with dez... he's got a plethora of scientific evidence accumulated from demolishing GTR fan boys from last year. HAHAH!!! I personally don't think the GTR is "fugly" and I think it's an impressive car... but... truth hurts... for the money, 996TT is a better value for the performance.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 02:35 PM
  #111  
Monaco's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 897
Rep Power: 79
Monaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by jhuang25
for the money, 996TT is a better value for the performance.
Taking into account foresight when it does come to modifications, reliability, maintenance, and durability I would agree with you.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #112  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jpvarghese
See, you are speaking hypothetically. IF the GT-R had this/that, but the case is that stock for stock the GT-R is a quicker car. The question was of a 996t vs. a GT-R. As far as the interior goes, under what criteria are you judging. By features, the GT-R wins. By quality, it's obvious the Porsche is better. So, no sir, you obviously can't take it. WTF do you mean when you say JDM crowd? I respect cars regardless of origin. The JDM crowd reference is to the typical punk mentality they have, and it was not meant towards yourself but someone else. you know the 2fast2furious crowd. If you have ever been out on a cruise night you will know what I mean. As for the interior, I would agree that features there are more in the GTR. But the Turbo's layout is much smoother and pleasing to the eye, and the pics above show it. I have said this from the very first GTR discussion, I have no issue with the car I have an issue with the people that own it. They have to talk about how superior their car is, when it is not. You like your car fine. The Turbo is a much better long term vehicle than the GTR. if you are going to drive for a short time, the GTR is fine, but the turbo is and has always been a lifetime car. plain and simple. This thread didn't go to hell in a handbasket until a GTR owner started to slam the turbo and say outright lies from his lack of knowledge. Not the first time, the guy is a confrontational jerk, and has shown it to be the case many times against another turbo owner. Not even sure why he hangs out here, when he does not even own a p-car. But to slam someone elses car is even worse.


Consistency is the name of the game here. Because of its gearbox, power delivery, and next to no loss in boost between shifts, it has a higher advantage in straight line acceleration. The AWD system is much more advanced no matter how you cut it; game boyish or not. In the end, though its about preference. I'm just throwing out the facts. Stock for stock, the GT-R is a better performing car.

the laws of physics cannot be changed. THe power to weight ratio is nearly identical. 3836/480 bhp = 8 for the gtr. The 996TT is 3388/420 = 8.06.

The difference between the two is nil. We are talking about a turbo that ended production in 2005 and the 2009 GTR has the same power to weight ratio. The only reason why the GTR is faster is because of it's transmission which is also it's achiles heel. The other achiles heel is it's massive weight. The car does well on the track, but the wear and tear on the entire drivetrain and suspension will take it's toll in very short order.

Again, it is only when a GTR fanboy starts attacking our cars that we respond.

see above
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #113  
f1crazydriver's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,738
From: SFBA
Rep Power: 135
f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !f1crazydriver Is a GOD !
Why don't we just the results do the talking when i participate in the event agsint a gtr ? I'm very curious myself- and quiet frankly i do not think i will lose against a gtr As for interiors go.... the GTR is a joke in terms of quality in the interior- my best buddy has one and he rags on it to. There really isnt a comparison when it comes to quality between the two. Zero. Porsche >>>>>>> leaps and bounds over a Nissan. As whats faster at the track, we shall see
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #114  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by f1crazydriver
Why don't we just the results do the talking when i participate in the event agsint a gtr ? I'm very curious myself- and quiet frankly i do not think i will lose against a gtr As for interiors go.... the GTR is a joke in terms of quality in the interior- my best buddy has one and he rags on it to. There really isnt a comparison when it comes to quality between the two. Zero. Porsche >>>>>>> leaps and bounds over a Nissan. As whats faster at the track, we shall see

yes you are oneCRAZYf1driver
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #115  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Holy crap, check out this similarity. GTR and Ford. F150 interiors. I think the F150 interior is nicer


 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #116  
Monaco's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 897
Rep Power: 79
Monaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond reputeMonaco has a reputation beyond repute
Power to weight is only part of the story, although significant, it's not primary. You can't use that as an argument to whether a car is quicker or not anymore. As far as Peter goes, he's confrontational because he loves to race. You can't blame the guy for ruffling feathers. It's all friendly fun and to get upset about stupid hypothetical situations is dumb. As someone else said, let the results do the talking! He has to defend his car just like many of you have to because simply put, both camps are going off hearsay and web-based rumors.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #117  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jpvarghese
Power to weight is only part of the story, although significant, it's not primary. You can't use that as an argument to whether a car is quicker or not anymore. As far as Peter goes, he's confrontational because he loves to race. You can't blame the guy for ruffling feathers. It's all friendly fun and to get upset about stupid hypothetical situations is dumb. As someone else said, let the results do the talking! He has to defend his car just like many of you have to because simply put, both camps are going off hearsay and web-based rumors.

I have no problem with him being confrontational so am I. But he gets offended when someone gives it right back to him and cries like a baby, "I'm not talking to you anymore"...lol. Not grown behavior

As for performance, the reason for it is the tranny, period. and that is fine. Porsche has gone to pdk as well and it will be hellaciously fast, but it takes the driver skill out. I don't think I will ever own a pdk/auto tranny, as I like the raw feel of a manual.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #118  
Steve Theodore's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,436
From: North Bend, WA
Rep Power: 164
Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !Steve Theodore Is a GOD !
I honestly love these kind of threads, despite what they make everyone do. There is no reason for personal attacks regardless of the way you feel, and it's awesome that we have 2 cars like these to choose from as automotive enthusiasts.

To better explain Peter's perspective, I honestly think some of it comes from being a Supra owner. I owned MKIV Supras for many years and we truly became used to having to defend our Japanese supercars to just about anyone who wanted to tell us how they couldn't possibly compete with their Vette/Viper/Porsche, etc. It has only been in the last few years where the MKIV Supra has earned a fearsome reputation on the quarter mile and more recently mile competitions.

Regarding comparions these two cars, they are truly an apples to oranges comparison in my mind and, for anyone who has seat time in both, you'll probably agree that you're drawn to one more than the other (regardless of cost). I've been fortunate enough to drive 2 R35 GTR's at this point, and they are really awesome machines despite their size and weight.

These are just my opinions (obviously) but I'd compare them like this.

  • For a daily driver, the GTR is superior
  • For a "do-it-all" car, which includes commuting and spirited driving, I think the GTR has an edge
  • For a fun weekend car, the 996TT is more engaging
  • For a track car, the 996TT would be more affordable to operate...but I'm not sure which one would be better in that case
When driving an R35 GTR, you are amazed by how well it moves out despite all the known shortcomings. It truly amazes and impresses with how that transmission shifts and makes you realize that no matter how much you love to shift your 6MT car, you'll never be able to compete with that thing. It can go slow and extremely fast with little fuss. However, it's not as engaging a car to drive, at least not relative to the 996TT. The car feels like it's doing just about everything for you, but you're kind of left out of the experience. It's no surprise whatsoever to me that the video game generation likes the GTR because it honestly feels like you're playing a video game when you drive one.

I can almost guarantee one thing. Although both are amazing cars and offer incredibly high performance limits, I bet you'll be drawn to one or the other after you drive both. I've driven a lightly modified GTR back to back with my own reflashed 996TT and can say that my own car feels very slow in comparison. But, as most of us Porsche owners know, there is much more to the overall driving experience than just going fast. The Porsche gives you a great sensation of involvement...like you're part of the equation when it comes to going fast. The GTR is more like the car is telling you that it wants to show you what it can do.

Granted, before anyone gets themselves worked up, I probably have about 15 miles of seat time in a GTR and 5000 (and counting) miles in my 996TT. My point is mainly that they are amazingly different at the way they go about their business, and both cars should be celebrated.

Would I expect to find a bunch of GTR fans on a Porsche forum? Of course not. Would the reaction be opposite on a GTR forum? Absolutely.

 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #119  
TwinTurboPete's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 0
TwinTurboPete is infamous around these parts
Its a great car but not worth the money considering the performance it offers. Are you serious?

Originally Posted by vbmw335
Like i said before...not much can be done to hide the weight of GTR. My friends GTR with Cobb AP tune and Mid pipes and exhaust was dusted by my k16/16g which cost me 3k total. i pulled 4 cars...he basically gave up.

The car is fast until 100, then it falls flat. The tune made it better but no match to 996tt modded. Its a great car but not worth the money considering the performance it offers. As evident from the mile , you need 800+ hp to be close to 190. A k24/18g will get you there with sub 600 hp.
 
Old Oct 29, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #120  
vbmw335's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,215
From: Socal
Rep Power: 82
vbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant futurevbmw335 has a brilliant future
Originally Posted by TwinTurboPete
Its a great car but not worth the money considering the performance it offers. Are you serious?
Yes I am . why is that surprising? It needs 800+ hp to equal my perfectly reliable 600 hp 996tt. Let me know when its ready to play ...i will consider one. I dont have to worry about breaking my transmission , limp modes and all the BS service costs and issues that come with the GTR.

Plus its still a porky nissan at the end of day!

Hell...when i raced my friends cobb tuned mid pipe exhaust GTR with my lowly k16/16g ...i left him by 4 cars...he never would want to race a 911 again. Yeah its very fast around the ring , but only that car and that specific driver can replicate that...
 

Last edited by vbmw335; Oct 29, 2009 at 09:13 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:55 AM.