Thanks Protomotive!
I think an elephant can fart-out more than 25-26lpbs of air per minute. Damn those lil' K16 are small. Sctot did run 11.6 with them tho!
Originally Posted by sharkster
Interesting approach, even though the mapping changes from being on pump to VP103, the fuel in the car remains constant though? Either it's 91 or 103? So I think people just need to be careful and realize that even though the mapping changes above 1.2 bar to aggressive VP103 mode if they're running 91 they need to dial back their boost controller. If they leave it in the wrong place kansas is going bye bye

Originally Posted by sharkster
I think an elephant can fart-out more than 25-26lpbs of air per minute. Damn those lil' K16 are small. Sctot did run 11.6 with them tho!
>>>>>> All good questions
The ecu continually changes the parameters as long as it can see what's going on... and yes, we're able to map according to different levels of boost/load. At the .8 bar line, we're tuned for pump fuel, same up to around 1.0 bar, then at the 1.2 bar line, we've calibrated on VP103, and can change the calibration as many times as we want throughout the mapping as long as we have enough resolution. There's resolution down to around 40rpm's and a % or so load which would be to around .01 bar. There are many different tables to work with as well if you need to hit a sweet spot
[/quote]
I see, so there for a car with large turbo's with race gas will be running on a pump gas file until it reaches the the 1.2 mark! WOW
I feel sorry for the guy's with lag
.
The ecu continually changes the parameters as long as it can see what's going on... and yes, we're able to map according to different levels of boost/load. At the .8 bar line, we're tuned for pump fuel, same up to around 1.0 bar, then at the 1.2 bar line, we've calibrated on VP103, and can change the calibration as many times as we want throughout the mapping as long as we have enough resolution. There's resolution down to around 40rpm's and a % or so load which would be to around .01 bar. There are many different tables to work with as well if you need to hit a sweet spot
[/quote]I see, so there for a car with large turbo's with race gas will be running on a pump gas file until it reaches the the 1.2 mark! WOW
I feel sorry for the guy's with lag
.
I have two cars, the P car and my Evo 8... both exactly the same greddy boost controller... I have never been in the WRONG boost setting....
All the high end cars running twin turbo set ups... from vipers to mustangs to Vettes.....they use a AEM standalone paired with a EBC... including all the JAP cars liek Supra, Skylines. etc.
When was the last time any of you put ur boxers on the wrong way?
I would bet that the above is more prone to happen then one sitting in HIGH boost instead of LOW....
most guys here spend 10 minutes warming up the car... then another 2 minutes cooling off the car... why then would any of us make a mistake of being in the wrong boost setting?
If you don't respect the motor and use appropriate fuel with boost YOU DO NOT DESERVE TO DRIVE THIS CAR NOR ANY OTHER TURBOCHARGED CAR.
I would not give this car with a EBC to a high school kid that's for sure....
just my opinion guys.... from experience.
markski
PS. Im not saying that this approach is superior to others... just different...
All the high end cars running twin turbo set ups... from vipers to mustangs to Vettes.....they use a AEM standalone paired with a EBC... including all the JAP cars liek Supra, Skylines. etc.
When was the last time any of you put ur boxers on the wrong way?
I would bet that the above is more prone to happen then one sitting in HIGH boost instead of LOW....
most guys here spend 10 minutes warming up the car... then another 2 minutes cooling off the car... why then would any of us make a mistake of being in the wrong boost setting?
If you don't respect the motor and use appropriate fuel with boost YOU DO NOT DESERVE TO DRIVE THIS CAR NOR ANY OTHER TURBOCHARGED CAR.
I would not give this car with a EBC to a high school kid that's for sure....
just my opinion guys.... from experience.
markski
PS. Im not saying that this approach is superior to others... just different...
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Last edited by markski@markskituning; Feb 2, 2007 at 10:21 PM.
My 993TT had UMW turbos and Protomotive Programming (those were the
days...). Boost controller was in the glove box. How often did I change the
setting? Almost never. I drove to the gas station, pulled up to 100 octane
gas pumps, gave the guy a C-note and pushed the button. How hard is that?
MK
days...). Boost controller was in the glove box. How often did I change the
setting? Almost never. I drove to the gas station, pulled up to 100 octane
gas pumps, gave the guy a C-note and pushed the button. How hard is that?
MK
Originally Posted by topgun
>>>>>> All good questions
The ecu continually changes the parameters as long as it can see what's going on... and yes, we're able to map according to different levels of boost/load. At the .8 bar line, we're tuned for pump fuel, same up to around 1.0 bar, then at the 1.2 bar line, we've calibrated on VP103, and can change the calibration as many times as we want throughout the mapping as long as we have enough resolution. There's resolution down to around 40rpm's and a % or so load which would be to around .01 bar. There are many different tables to work with as well if you need to hit a sweet spot 
The ecu continually changes the parameters as long as it can see what's going on... and yes, we're able to map according to different levels of boost/load. At the .8 bar line, we're tuned for pump fuel, same up to around 1.0 bar, then at the 1.2 bar line, we've calibrated on VP103, and can change the calibration as many times as we want throughout the mapping as long as we have enough resolution. There's resolution down to around 40rpm's and a % or so load which would be to around .01 bar. There are many different tables to work with as well if you need to hit a sweet spot 
I feel sorry for the guy's with lag
.[/quote]Lag is not your friend that's for sure
My car is pretty tame by some of today's standards but I get full boost right around the 3850-4K mark and that already feels "laggy" to me, then I see some of Marksi's and other big dogs etc.. I remember the days when I had Kevin's ZC turbos or when my car was a GT700 I'd get full boost around the 3.5K mark and didn't worry about lag. Not saying my car is better just different (heh- just to use Marksi's age-old saying).And Marksi, you should know that just like no EVO cars have boost controllers, none of us wear boxers backwards. We stick to underoos
Originally Posted by topgun
Speaking aboust boost controller, the one way to have just one file for two fuels, is to change the fuel parameters once you cross a certain threshold lets say 1.2 bar. This will allow the ECU to adjust & add more fuel!! but keep in mind, if you run on high boost(race fuel) BEFORE you hit that threshold you will run either to rich or to lean depending on the fuel! Especialy if you have large turbos & it takes forever to reach that threshold! but then again I'm just a dumb shmuck anyway 


Anyways, it's late, I've lost my underoos and can't find the trap door to my boxsters.
Once again, congrats Jamie and normally I'd say be careful but with the Supras you have you can obviously more than handle it
When you're out here next time drop by buddy.
Alex,
I'm confused on some of the stuff as well... Im by far not any more knowledgable then anyone else here...
The point is.. be prudent and look out for the car like you would for anything else... and I think most of us do a decent job.
I wish we had an electronic way of doing this stuff... meaning the ECU doing the work.. I think its around the corner though... Or its already being done.
I kind of got used to this stuff so Im OK with it...
..as far as LAG... well its a relative word... coming out of a ZC stage 5 liek you Alex.. everything will be laggy LOL
I simply stay in a higher gear if I have too... and I have that much more RPMS on top to make up for it...
However, I hope we get to meet one day casue my car really seems different... you almost dont feel the lag... I dont know how to explain it...
cams, heads, a combination of both?.. I dont know... but KPG drove my car and he was pleasantly surprised...
best,
Mark
I'm confused on some of the stuff as well... Im by far not any more knowledgable then anyone else here...
The point is.. be prudent and look out for the car like you would for anything else... and I think most of us do a decent job.
I wish we had an electronic way of doing this stuff... meaning the ECU doing the work.. I think its around the corner though... Or its already being done.
I kind of got used to this stuff so Im OK with it...
..as far as LAG... well its a relative word... coming out of a ZC stage 5 liek you Alex.. everything will be laggy LOL
I simply stay in a higher gear if I have too... and I have that much more RPMS on top to make up for it...
However, I hope we get to meet one day casue my car really seems different... you almost dont feel the lag... I dont know how to explain it...
cams, heads, a combination of both?.. I dont know... but KPG drove my car and he was pleasantly surprised...
best,
Mark
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Good point Sharky, When are we going to see some numbers on the BIG DOGS!! Seeing how this GT2 is coming on so strong early,it should be an animal up to 160, the cars with the big ***** better look out!
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Alex,
I'm confused on some of the stuff as well... Im by far not any more knowledgable then anyone else here...
The point is.. be prudent and look out for the car like you would for anything else... and I think most of us do a decent job.
I wish we had an electronic way of doing this stuff... meaning the ECU doing the work.. I think its around the corner though... Or its already being done.
I kind of got used to this stuff so Im OK with it...
..as far as LAG... well its a relative word... coming out of a ZC stage 5 liek you Alex.. everything will be laggy LOL
I simply stay in a higher gear if I have too... and I have that much more RPMS on top to make up for it...
However, I hope we get to meet one day casue my car really seems different... you almost dont feel the lag... I dont know how to explain it...
cams, heads, a combination of both?.. I dont know... but KPG drove my car and he was pleasantly surprised...
best,
Mark
I'm confused on some of the stuff as well... Im by far not any more knowledgable then anyone else here...
The point is.. be prudent and look out for the car like you would for anything else... and I think most of us do a decent job.
I wish we had an electronic way of doing this stuff... meaning the ECU doing the work.. I think its around the corner though... Or its already being done.
I kind of got used to this stuff so Im OK with it...
..as far as LAG... well its a relative word... coming out of a ZC stage 5 liek you Alex.. everything will be laggy LOL
I simply stay in a higher gear if I have too... and I have that much more RPMS on top to make up for it...
However, I hope we get to meet one day casue my car really seems different... you almost dont feel the lag... I dont know how to explain it...
cams, heads, a combination of both?.. I dont know... but KPG drove my car and he was pleasantly surprised...
best,
Mark
The ZC stage V (I think I had stage IV?) combined with the GIAC GT640 tuning was actually a 10 second car but we didn't know/realize it at the time. Although I still remember my GT700 stuff fondly which spools up like an SOB. My turbos now, like Craigs are larger, but obviously induce more lag but we're working on that
Originally Posted by sharkster
I think an elephant can fart-out more than 25-26lpbs of air per minute. Damn those lil' K16 are small. Sctot did run 11.6 with them tho!
Originally Posted by Jean
Did you ever get to inspect closely an elephant's rear compressor size? Might be more like a BB GT40R 

Alex,
I did 6.46 60 to 130 @ .8 bars( boost controller off) but I saw a.9 bar peak.
40 degree temp with not too much traction... 2 shifts....
I still have yet to start cranking up the boost.... but cant get traction in cold temps...
I want to do a 0 to 300 KM and 100 to 300 KM...
I did 6.46 60 to 130 @ .8 bars( boost controller off) but I saw a.9 bar peak.
40 degree temp with not too much traction... 2 shifts....
I still have yet to start cranking up the boost.... but cant get traction in cold temps...
I want to do a 0 to 300 KM and 100 to 300 KM...
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Last edited by markski@markskituning; Feb 3, 2007 at 03:10 AM.





